Morton A. Heller, Jeffrey A. Calcaterra, Shavonda Green, and Francisco Jose de Lima Earlier research (Heller, 1985, 1987, 1989, 1992, 1993) found large effects of orientation on the recognizability of tangible patterns and braille by people who are blind and those who are sighted. The subjects who were congenitally blind had difficulty coping with tilt when numbers were drawn on their palms (Heller, 1989), but this difficulty could have been related to their lack of familiarity with the patterns. Orientation is also relevant to learning to use an Optacon, since the absence of spatial reference information could impede learning (see Millar, 1997). The effects of orientation are not specific to touch because the recognition of visual patterns is also affected by orientation (Heller, 1992; Millar, 1997). In these studies, the performance of the subjects who were blind was lower when the braille characters were tilted by +45 and +90 degrees, and the performance of the subjects who were congenitally blind was slightly lower than that of the other subjects (those who were late blind and those who were sighted) (Heller, 1992). The effect of visual status was nonsignificant, but phenomenological reports differed for those
[1]
S. Millar.
Reading by touch
,
1997
.
[2]
M A Heller.
Tactile Memory in Sighted and Blind Observers: The Influence of Orientation and Rate of Presentation
,
1989,
Perception.
[3]
M A Heller,et al.
The Effect of Orientation on Visual and Tactual Braille Recognition
,
1987,
Perception.
[4]
M. Heller.
The effect of orientation on tactual braille recognition: Optimal touching positions
,
1992,
Perception & psychophysics.
[5]
M A Heller,et al.
Tactual Perception of Embossed Morse Code and Braille: The Alliance of Vision and Touch
,
1985,
Perception.
[6]
M. Heller.
Influence of visual guidance on braille recognition: Low lighting also helps touch
,
1993,
Perception & psychophysics.