Phase Angle Spatial Embedding (PhASE) - A Kernel Method for Studying the Topology of the Human Functional Connectome

Modern resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) provides a wealth of information about the inherent functional connectivity of the human brain. However, understanding the role of negative correlations and the nonlinear topology of rs-fMRI remains a challenge. To address these challenges, we propose a novel graph embedding technique, phase angle spatial embedding (PhASE), to study the “intrinsic geometry” of the functional connectome. PhASE both incorporates negative correlations as well as reformulates the connectome modularity problem as a kernel two-sample test, using a kernel method that induces a maximum mean discrepancy (MMD) in a reproducing kernel Hilbert space (RKHS). By solving a graph partition that maximizes this MMD, PhASE identifies the most functionally distinct brain modules. As a test case, we analyzed a public rs-fMRI dataset to compare male and female connectomes using PhASE and minimum spanning tree inferential statistics. These results show statistically significant differences between male and female resting-state brain networks, demonstrating PhASE to be a robust tool for connectome analysis.

[1]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Exact Topological Inference for Paired Brain Networks via Persistent Homology , 2017, bioRxiv.

[2]  M E J Newman,et al.  Modularity and community structure in networks. , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  Kevin Murphy,et al.  Towards a consensus regarding global signal regression for resting state functional connectivity MRI , 2017, NeuroImage.

[4]  Olaf Sporns,et al.  Complex network measures of brain connectivity: Uses and interpretations , 2010, NeuroImage.

[5]  Christian Windischberger,et al.  Toward discovery science of human brain function , 2010, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[6]  Bung-Nyun Kim,et al.  Persistent Brain Network Homology From the Perspective of Dendrogram , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[7]  Moo K. Chung,et al.  Computing the Shape of Brain Networks Using Graph Filtration and Gromov-Hausdorff Metric , 2011, MICCAI.

[8]  Sivaraman Balakrishnan,et al.  Optimal kernel choice for large-scale two-sample tests , 2012, NIPS.

[9]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  A Kernel Two-Sample Test , 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res..

[10]  C J Stam,et al.  The trees and the forest: Characterization of complex brain networks with minimum spanning trees. , 2014, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[11]  Liang Zhan,et al.  The significance of negative correlations in brain connectivity , 2017, The Journal of comparative neurology.

[12]  M. Wintermark,et al.  Resting-State Functional MRI: Everything That Nonexperts Have Always Wanted to Know , 2018, American Journal of Neuroradiology.

[13]  Allen Q. Ye,et al.  The intrinsic geometry of the human brain connectome. , 2015, Brain informatics.

[14]  O. Sporns,et al.  Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems , 2009, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.