Non-random distribution of DNA double-strand breaks induced by particle irradiation.

Induction of DNA double-strand breaks (dsbs) in mammalian cells is dependent on the spatial distribution of energy deposition from the ionizing radiation. For high LET particle radiations the primary ionization sites occur in a correlated manner along the track of the particles, while for X-rays these sites are much more randomly distributed throughout the volume of the cell. It can therefore be expected that the distribution of dsbs linearly along the DNA molecule also varies with the type of radiation and the ionization density. Using pulsed-field gel and conventional gel techniques, we measured the size distribution of DNA molecules from irradiated human fibroblasts in the total range of 0.1 kbp-10 Mbp for X-rays and high LET particles (N ions, 97 keV/microns and Fe ions, 150 keV/microns). On a mega base pair scale we applied conventional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis techniques such as measurement of the fraction of DNA released from the well (FAR) and measurement of breakage within a specific NotI restriction fragment (hybridization assay). The induction rate for widely spaced breaks was found to decrease with LET. However, when the entire distribution of radiation-induced fragments was analysed, we detected an excess of fragments with sizes below about 200 kbp for the particles compared with X-irradiation. X-rays are thus more effective than high LET radiations in producing large DNA fragments but less effective in the production of smaller fragments. We determined the total induction rate of dsbs for the three radiations based on a quantitative analysis of all the measured radiation-induced fragments and found that the high LET particles were more efficient than X-rays at inducing dsbs, indicating an increasing total efficiency with LET. Conventional assays that are based only on the measurement of large fragments are therefore misleading when determining total dsb induction rates of high LET particles. The possible biological significance of this non-randomness for dsb induction is discussed.

[1]  M. Löbrich,et al.  DNA double-strand break measurement in mammalian cells by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: an approach using restriction enzymes and gene probing. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[2]  C. Cantor,et al.  Long-distance restriction mapping of the proximal long arm of human chromosome 21 with Not I linking clones. , 1992, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[3]  W. Dewey,et al.  Measurement of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. , 1990, Radiation research.

[4]  Detlef Blöcher,et al.  DNA Double-strand Break Repair Determines the RBE of α-particles , 1988 .

[5]  D T Goodhead,et al.  Initial events in the cellular effects of ionizing radiations: clustered damage in DNA. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[6]  M. Löbrich,et al.  DNA double-strand breaks induced by high-energy neon and iron ions in human fibroblasts. I. Pulsed-field gel electrophoresis method. , 1994, Radiation research.

[7]  P. Bryant,et al.  A component of DNA double-strand break repair is dependent on the spatial orientation of the lesions within the higher-order structures of chromatin. , 1994, International journal of radiation biology.

[8]  D Blöcher,et al.  In CHEF electrophoresis a linear induction of dsb corresponds to a nonlinear fraction of extracted DNA with dose. , 1990, International journal of radiation biology.

[9]  K. Weber,et al.  Lethality of heavy ion-induced DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. , 1993, International journal of radiation biology.

[10]  J. Thacker.  Radiation-Induced Mutation in Mammalian Cells at Low Doses and Dose Rates , 1992 .

[11]  M. Ritter,et al.  High-LET radiations induce a large proportion of non-rejoining DNA breaks , 1977, Nature.

[12]  E. Blakely,et al.  Impaired repair capacity of DNA breaks induced in mammalian cellular DNA by accelerated heavy ions. , 1979, Radiation research.

[13]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Repair of x-ray-induced DNA double-strand breaks in specific Not I restriction fragments in human fibroblasts: joining of correct and incorrect ends. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[14]  L. Wang,et al.  Comparison of repair of DNA double-strand breaks caused by neutron or gamma radiation in cultured human cells. , 1991 .

[15]  J. Ward,et al.  Biochemistry of DNA lesions. , 1985, Radiation research. Supplement.

[16]  J. Arrand,et al.  Relative contributions of levels of initial DNA damage and repair of double strand breaks to the ionizing radiation-sensitive phenotype of the Chinese hamster cell mutant, XR-V15B. Part I. X-rays. , 1993, International journal of radiation biology.

[17]  G van den Engh,et al.  A random-walk/giant-loop model for interphase chromosomes. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[18]  D. Blöcher.  DNA double strand breaks in Ehrlich ascites tumour cells at low doses of x-rays. I. Determination of induced breaks by centrifugation at reduced speed. , 1982, International journal of radiation biology and related studies in physics, chemistry, and medicine.

[19]  M. Löbrich,et al.  Measurement of DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells by pulsed-field gel electrophoresis: a new approach using rarely cutting restriction enzymes. , 1994, Radiation research.

[20]  N. Denko,et al.  Asymmetric field inversion gel electrophoresis: a new method for detecting DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian cells. , 1990, Radiation research.

[21]  F Ianzini,et al.  Direct comparison of biological effectiveness of protons and alpha-particles of the same LET. III. Initial yield of DNA double-strand breaks in V79 cells. , 1992, International journal of radiation biology.

[22]  J. W. Bodnar,et al.  A domain model for eukaryotic DNA organization: a molecular basis for cell differentiation and chromosome evolution. , 1988, Journal of theoretical biology.