Total Metabolic Tumor Volume on 18F-FDG PET/CT Is a Useful Prognostic Biomarker for Patients with Extensive Small-Cell Lung Cancer Undergoing First-Line Chemo-Immunotherapy

Simple Summary Chemotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors is the new standard of care for first-line systemic therapy in extensive small-cell lung cancer. The identification of biomarkers for patients that are likely or not likely to respond to such therapy is critical. We aimed at determining whether imaging could help to predict outcomes among these patients. We showed that the total metabolic tumor burden, extracted from pre-treatment 18-FDG PET/CT imaging, may be a useful biomarker associated with survival. Finally, we think that this result should be taken into account in clinical trials, and that it might need further validation through large, independent, and prospective cohorts. Abstract Background: We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers on 18F-FDG PET/CT in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) patients undergoing first-line chemo-immunotherapy. Methods: In this multicenter and retrospective study, we considered two cohorts, depending on the type of first-line therapy: chemo-immunotherapy (CIT) versus chemotherapy alone (CT). All patients underwent baseline 18-FDG PET/CT before therapy between June 2016 and September 2021. We evaluated clinical, biological, and PET parameters, and used cutoffs from previously published studies or predictiveness curves to assess the association with progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) with Cox prediction models. Results: Sixty-eight patients were included (CIT: CT) (36: 32 patients). The median PFS was 5.9:6.5 months, while the median OS was 12.1:9.8 months. dNLR (the derived neutrophils/(leucocytes-neutrophils) ratio) was an independent predictor of short PFS and OS in the two cohorts (p < 0.05). High total metabolic tumor volume (TMTVhigh if > 241 cm3) correlated with outcomes, but only in the CIT cohort (PFS for TMTVhigh in multivariable analysis: HR 2.5; 95%CI 1.1–5.9). Conclusion: Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT using TMTV could help to predict worse outcomes for ES-SCLC patients undergoing first-line CIT. This suggests that baseline TMTV may be used to identify patients that are unlikely to benefit from CIT.

[1]  R. Wahl,et al.  Joint EANM/SNMMI/ANZSNM practice guidelines/procedure standards on recommended use of [18F]FDG PET/CT imaging during immunomodulatory treatments in patients with solid tumors version 1.0 , 2022, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[2]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  149P Total metabolic tumor volume: A new potential prognostic factor in SCLC , 2022, Annals of Oncology.

[3]  F. Ponziani,et al.  Optimizing systemic therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: the key role of liver function. , 2022, Digestive and liver disease : official journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver.

[4]  L. Paz-Ares,et al.  Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer: First-Line and Second-Line Treatment Options. , 2022, Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology.

[5]  N. Chaput,et al.  Tumour burden and efficacy of immune-checkpoint inhibitors , 2021, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[6]  V. Ambrosini,et al.  Baseline total metabolic tumour volume on 2-deoxy-2-[18F]fluoro-d-glucose positron emission tomography-computed tomography as a promising biomarker in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer treated with first-line pembrolizumab. , 2021, European journal of cancer.

[7]  P. Andersen,et al.  Prognostic Value of 18F–FDG–PET Parameters in Patients with Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis and Review of Current Literature , 2021, Diagnostics.

[8]  A. Chinnaiyan,et al.  Liver metastasis restrains immunotherapy efficacy via macrophage-mediated T cell elimination , 2021, Nature Medicine.

[9]  M. Soussan,et al.  Association of the Metabolic Score Using Baseline FDG-PET/CT and dNLR with Immunotherapy Outcomes in Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with First-Line Pembrolizumab , 2020, Cancers.

[10]  S. Rossi,et al.  The immune-metabolic-prognostic index and clinical outcomes in patients with non-small cell lung carcinoma under checkpoint inhibitors , 2020, Journal of Cancer Research and Clinical Oncology.

[11]  S. Rossi,et al.  Hyperprogressive Disease in Patients with Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Checkpoint Inhibitors: The Role of 18F-FDG PET/CT , 2019, The Journal of Nuclear Medicine.

[12]  Young Hak Kim,et al.  Durvalumab plus platinum–etoposide versus platinum–etoposide in first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (CASPIAN): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial , 2019, The Lancet.

[13]  D. Planchard,et al.  Baseline metabolic tumor burden on FDG PET/CT scans predicts outcome in advanced NSCLC patients treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors , 2019, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[14]  A. Rowland,et al.  Evaluation of the lung immune prognostic index for prediction of survival and response in patients treated with atezolizumab for non-small cell lung cancer: pooled analysis of clinical trials. , 2019, Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer.

[15]  N. Chaput,et al.  Predictive biomarkers of response for immune checkpoint inhibitors in non-small-cell lung cancer. , 2019, European journal of cancer.

[16]  A. Mansfield,et al.  First‐Line Atezolizumab plus Chemotherapy in Extensive‐Stage Small‐Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[17]  E. Felip,et al.  Association of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer , 2018, JAMA oncology.

[18]  M. Sharma,et al.  Role of Various Metabolic Parameters Derived From Baseline 18F-FDG PET/CT as Prognostic Markers in Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing Platinum-Based Chemotherapy , 2018, Clinical nuclear medicine.

[19]  J. Taube,et al.  Liver Metastasis and Treatment Outcome with Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibody in Patients with Melanoma and NSCLC , 2017, Cancer Immunology Research.

[20]  J. Wolchok,et al.  Neutrophil to Lymphocyte Ratio is Associated With Outcome During Ipilimumab Treatment☆ , 2017, EBioMedicine.

[21]  S. Jalal,et al.  Small Cell Lung Cancer. , 2018, Cancer treatment and research.

[22]  J. Soria,et al.  Rapid and objective CT scan prognostic scoring identifies metastatic patients with long-term clinical benefit on anti-PD-1/-L1 therapy. , 2016, European journal of cancer.

[23]  Matthieu Montes,et al.  Predictiveness curves in virtual screening , 2015, Journal of Cheminformatics.

[24]  S. Mandrekar,et al.  Evaluation of Progression-Free Survival as a Surrogate End Point for Overall Survival in First-Line Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer , 2015 .

[25]  Eric J. W. Visser,et al.  FDG PET/CT: EANM procedure guidelines for tumour imaging: version 2.0 , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[26]  Federica Fioroni,et al.  Metabolic tumour volumes measured at staging in lymphoma: methodological evaluation on phantom experiments and patients , 2014, European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging.

[27]  D. McMillan The systemic inflammation-based Glasgow Prognostic Score: a decade of experience in patients with cancer. , 2013, Cancer treatment reviews.

[28]  Hao Zhang,et al.  Independent prognostic value of whole-body metabolic tumor burden from FDG-PET in non-small cell lung cancer , 2013, International Journal of Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery.

[29]  Vivian Viallon,et al.  Discrimination measures for survival outcomes: Connection between the AUC and the predictiveness curve , 2011, Biometrical journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift.

[30]  P. Harper,et al.  Predictive and prognostic factors in small cell lung cancer: current status. , 2000, Lung cancer.

[31]  M. Uslenghi,et al.  The World Space Observatory (WSO-UV) - Current status , 2008, 0801.2080.