Multisensory object representation: insights from studies of vision and touch.

Behavioral studies show that the unisensory representations underlying within-modal visual and haptic object recognition are strikingly similar in terms of view- and size-sensitivity, and integration of structural and surface properties. However, the basis for these attributes differs in each modality, indicating that while these representations are functionally similar, they are not identical. Imaging studies reveal bisensory, visuo-haptic object selectivity, notably in the lateral occipital complex and the intraparietal sulcus, that suggests a shared representation of objects. Such a multisensory representation could underlie visuo-haptic cross-modal object recognition. In this chapter, we compare visual and haptic within-modal object recognition and trace a progression from functionally similar but separate unisensory representations to a shared multisensory representation underlying cross-modal object recognition as well as view-independence, regardless of modality. We outline, and provide evidence for, a model of multisensory object recognition in which representations are flexibly accessible via top-down or bottom-up processing, the choice of route being influenced by object familiarity and individual preference along the object-spatial continuum of mental imagery.

[1]  R. Lawson,et al.  The effects of size changes on haptic object recognition , 2009, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[2]  G. Humphrey,et al.  The Effect of Colour Congruency on Shape Discriminations of Novel Objects , 2004, Perception.

[3]  Kenneth M. Heilman,et al.  Multimodal agnosia after unilateral left hemisphere lesion , 1986, Neurology.

[4]  S. Lacey,et al.  Object and spatial imagery dimensions in visuo-haptic representations , 2011, Experimental Brain Research.

[5]  P. Graf,et al.  Influence of object size on baseline identification, priming, and explicit memory. , 2007, Scandinavian journal of psychology.

[6]  Jody C. Culham,et al.  Orientation sensitivity to graspable objects: An fMRI adaptation study , 2007, NeuroImage.

[7]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects from a haptic glance , 1995, Perception & psychophysics.

[8]  K. Sathian,et al.  Multisensory cortical processing of object shape and its relation to mental imagery , 2004, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[9]  S. Lacey,et al.  Cross-Modal Object Recognition Is Viewpoint-Independent , 2007, PloS one.

[10]  B. Bergum,et al.  Attention and performance IX , 1982 .

[11]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  Repetition priming and the haptic recognition of familiar and unfamiliar objects , 2008, Perception & psychophysics.

[12]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  Visual and haptic representations of scenes are updated with observer movement , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[13]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Direct Tactile Stimulation of Dorsal Occipito-Temporal Cortex in a Visual Agnosic , 2009, Current Biology.

[14]  G Rees,et al.  Differing causal roles for lateral occipital cortex and occipital face area in invariant shape recognition , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[15]  R L Klatzky,et al.  Identifying objects by touch: An “expert system” , 1985, Perception & psychophysics.

[16]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Effective connectivity during haptic perception: A study using Granger causality analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging data , 2008, NeuroImage.

[17]  Fiona N. Newell,et al.  The role of visual experience on the representation and updating of novel haptic scenes , 2007, Brain and Cognition.

[18]  Scott T. Grafton,et al.  Feeling with the mind's eye , 1997, Neuroreport.

[19]  John J. Foxe,et al.  Tactile shape discrimination recruits human lateral occipital complex during early perceptual processing , 2010, Human brain mapping.

[20]  M. Tarr,et al.  Visual object recognition: do we know more now than we did 20 years ago? , 2007, Annual review of psychology.

[21]  Sharlene D. Newman,et al.  Imagining material versus geometric properties of objects: an fMRI study. , 2005, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[22]  Svetlana S. Georgieva,et al.  Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Assess Adaptation and Size Invariance of Shape Processing by Humans and Monkeys , 2005, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[23]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  Size-Sensitive Perceptual Representations Underlie Visual and Haptic Object Recognition , 2009, PloS one.

[24]  A. Oliva,et al.  Canonical Visual Size for Real-world Objects , 2010 .

[25]  Minming Zhang,et al.  Neural networks active during tactile form perception: common and differential activity during macrospatial and microspatial tasks. , 2003, International journal of psychophysiology : official journal of the International Organization of Psychophysiology.

[26]  Amir Amedi,et al.  Multisensory visual–tactile object related network in humans: insights gained using a novel crossmodal adaptation approach , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  S. Lacey,et al.  Are surface properties integrated into visuohaptic object representations? , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[28]  Leslie G. Ungerleider Two cortical visual systems , 1982 .

[29]  S. Hsiao,et al.  Representation of object size in the somatosensory system. , 2006, Journal of neurophysiology.

[30]  M. Wexler,et al.  Observer Movement and Size Constancy , 2010, Psychological science.

[31]  P. Jolicoeur A size-congruency effect in memory for visual shape , 1987, Memory & cognition.

[32]  M. Kiyosawa,et al.  Auditory Triggered Mental Imagery of Shape Involves Visual Association Areas in Early Blind Humans , 2001, NeuroImage.

[33]  William M. Stern,et al.  Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex , 2007, Nature Neuroscience.

[34]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Activity and effective connectivity of parietal and occipital cortical regions during haptic shape perception , 2007, Neuropsychologia.

[35]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Haptic study of three-dimensional objects activates extrastriate visual areas , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[36]  Anne Bol,et al.  Cross-modal activation of visual cortex during depth perception using auditory substitution of vision , 2005, NeuroImage.

[37]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  Do Left and Right Matter for Haptic Recognition of Familiar Objects? , 2009, Perception.

[38]  Kenneth F. Valyear,et al.  A double dissociation between sensitivity to changes in object identity and object orientation in the ventral and dorsal visual streams: A human fMRI study , 2006, Neuropsychologia.

[39]  Lutz Jäncke,et al.  The plastic human brain. , 2009, Restorative neurology and neuroscience.

[40]  M J Farah,et al.  Tactile agnosia. Underlying impairment and implications for normal tactile object recognition. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[41]  Mary Hegarty,et al.  Revising the Visualizer-Verbalizer Dimension: Evidence for Two Types of Visualizers , 2002 .

[42]  Sandra M. Sanabria-Bohórquez,et al.  Occipital Activation by Pattern Recognition in the Early Blind Using Auditory Substitution for Vision , 2001, NeuroImage.

[43]  L. Merabet,et al.  The plastic human brain cortex. , 2005, Annual review of neuroscience.

[44]  A. Amedi,et al.  Functional imaging of human crossmodal identification and object recognition , 2005, Experimental Brain Research.

[45]  M. Goodale,et al.  Separate visual pathways for perception and action , 1992, Trends in Neurosciences.

[46]  R. Malach,et al.  Object-related activity revealed by functional magnetic resonance imaging in human occipital cortex. , 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[47]  T. Hendler,et al.  Convergence of visual and tactile shape processing in the human lateral occipital complex. , 2002, Cerebral cortex.

[48]  A. Iriki,et al.  Attention-induced neuronal activity in the monkey somatosensory cortex revealed by pupillometrics , 1996, Neuroscience Research.

[49]  Fiona N Newell,et al.  Canonical Views in Haptic Object Perception , 2008, Perception.

[50]  R. Mansfield,et al.  Analysis of visual behavior , 1982 .

[51]  Timothy J. Andrews,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals a distributed representation of inanimate objects and places in human visual cortex , 2005, NeuroImage.

[52]  Joaquín M. Fuster,et al.  Neuronal activity of somatosensory cortex in a cross-modal (visuo-haptic) memory task , 1997, Experimental Brain Research.

[53]  S. Lacey,et al.  Perceptual learning of view-independence in visuo-haptic object representations , 2009, Experimental Brain Research.

[54]  S. Edelman,et al.  Differential Processing of Objects under Various Viewing Conditions in the Human Lateral Occipital Complex , 1999, Neuron.

[55]  G. Boynton,et al.  Adaptation: from single cells to BOLD signals , 2006, Trends in Neurosciences.

[56]  K. Grill-Spector,et al.  Repetition and the brain: neural models of stimulus-specific effects , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[57]  Rebecca Lawson,et al.  The effects of temporal delay and orientation on haptic object recognition , 2010, Attention, perception & psychophysics.

[58]  John R. Votaw,et al.  Task-specific recruitment of dorsal and ventral visual areas during tactile perception , 2004, Neuropsychologia.

[59]  A. Kleinschmidt,et al.  Graded size sensitivity of object-exemplar-evoked activity patterns within human LOC subregions. , 2008, Journal of neurophysiology.

[60]  Michael A. Motes,et al.  Object-Spatial Imagery: A New Self-Report Imagery Questionnaire , 2006 .

[61]  Randall Stilla,et al.  Selective visuo‐haptic processing of shape and texture , 2008, Human brain mapping.

[62]  Jennifer M. Shephard,et al.  Spatial versus object visualizers: A new characterization of visual cognitive style , 2005, Memory & cognition.

[63]  M. Tarr,et al.  Mental rotation and orientation-dependence in shape recognition , 1989, Cognitive Psychology.

[64]  R. Klatzky,et al.  Hand movements: A window into haptic object recognition , 1987, Cognitive Psychology.

[65]  M. Bar The proactive brain: using analogies and associations to generate predictions , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[66]  G. Pourtois,et al.  Object representations for multiple visual categories overlap in lateral occipital and medial fusiform cortex. , 2009, Cerebral cortex.

[67]  T. Poggio,et al.  Hierarchical models of object recognition in cortex , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.

[68]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Dual pathways for haptic and visual perception of spatial and texture information , 2011, NeuroImage.

[69]  H. Bülthoff,et al.  Viewpoint Dependence in Visual and Haptic Object Recognition , 2001, Psychological science.

[70]  Isabel Gauthier,et al.  BOLD Activity during Mental Rotation and Viewpoint-Dependent Object Recognition , 2002, Neuron.

[71]  R. Klatzky,et al.  There's more to touch than meets the eye: The salience of object attributes for haptics with and without vision. , 1987 .

[72]  Simon Lacey,et al.  Object familiarity modulates the relationship between visual object imagery and haptic shape perception , 2010, NeuroImage.

[73]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  Cerebral Cortex Advance Access published April 28, 2006 Attention to Form or Surface Properties Modulates Different Regions of Human , 2022 .

[74]  Isabelle Bülthoff,et al.  The role of familiarity in the recognition of static and dynamic objects. , 2006, Progress in brain research.

[75]  K Sathian,et al.  Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. , 2005, Developmental psychobiology.

[76]  Ravi S. Menon,et al.  Differential Effects of Viewpoint on Object-Driven Activation in Dorsal and Ventral Streams , 2002, Neuron.

[77]  Soledad Ballesteros,et al.  Touch and Blindness: Psychology and Neuroscience , 2005 .

[78]  Amir Amedi,et al.  A Putative Model of Multisensory Object Representation , 2009, Brain Topography.

[79]  Xiaoping Hu,et al.  Object familiarity modulates effective connectivity during haptic shape perception , 2010, NeuroImage.

[80]  I. Biederman,et al.  Size invariance in visual object priming , 1992 .

[81]  T. Hendler,et al.  Visuo-haptic object-related activation in the ventral visual pathway , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  R. Lawson A comparison of the effects of depth rotation on visual and haptic three-dimensional object recognition. , 2009, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[83]  Jonathan S. Cant,et al.  fMR-adaptation reveals separate processing regions for the perception of form and texture in the human ventral stream , 2008, Experimental Brain Research.

[84]  K. Zilles,et al.  Human Somatosensory Area 2: Observer-Independent Cytoarchitectonic Mapping, Interindividual Variability, and Population Map , 2001, NeuroImage.

[85]  Nikolaus Kriegeskorte,et al.  Face-identity change activation outside the face system: "release from adaptation" may not always indicate neuronal selectivity. , 2010, Cerebral cortex.

[86]  K Sathian,et al.  Journeying beyond classical somatosensory cortex. , 2007, Canadian journal of experimental psychology = Revue canadienne de psychologie experimentale.

[87]  R. Dolan,et al.  Fmri activity patterns in human loc carry information about object exemplars within category , 2008 .