Multiscale cartilage biomechanics: technical challenges in realizing a high-throughput modelling and simulation workflow

Understanding the mechanical environment of articular cartilage and chondrocytes is of the utmost importance in evaluating tissue damage which is often related to failure of the fibre architecture and mechanical injury to the cells. This knowledge also has significant implications for understanding the mechanobiological response in healthy and diseased cartilage and can drive the development of intervention strategies, ranging from the design of tissue-engineered constructs to the establishment of rehabilitation protocols. Spanning multiple spatial scales, a wide range of biomechanical factors dictate this mechanical environment. Computational modelling and simulation provide descriptive and predictive tools to identify multiscale interactions, and can lead towards a greater comprehension of healthy and diseased cartilage function, possibly in an individualized manner. Cartilage and chondrocyte mechanics can be examined in silico, through post-processing or feed-forward approaches. First, joint–tissue level simulations, typically using the finite-element method, solve boundary value problems representing the joint articulation and underlying tissue, which can differentiate the role of compartmental joint loading in cartilage contact mechanics and macroscale cartilage field mechanics. Subsequently, tissue–cell scale simulations, driven by the macroscale cartilage mechanical field information, can predict chondrocyte deformation metrics along with the mechanics of the surrounding pericellular and extracellular matrices. A high-throughput modelling and simulation framework is necessary to develop models representative of regional and population-wide variations in cartilage and chondrocyte anatomy and mechanical properties, and to conduct large-scale analysis accommodating a multitude of loading scenarios. However, realization of such a framework is a daunting task, with technical difficulties hindering the processes of model development, scale coupling, simulation and interpretation of the results. This study aims to summarize various strategies to address the technical challenges of post-processing-based simulations of cartilage and chondrocyte mechanics with the ultimate goal of establishing the foundations of a high-throughput multiscale analysis framework. At the joint–tissue scale, rapid development of regional models of articular contact is possible by automating the process of generating parametric representations of cartilage boundaries and depth-dependent zonal delineation with associated constitutive relationships. At the tissue–cell scale, models descriptive of multicellular and fibrillar architecture of cartilage zones can also be generated in an automated fashion. Through post-processing, scripts can extract biphasic mechanical metrics at a desired point in the cartilage to assign loading and boundary conditions to models at the lower spatial scale of cells. Cell deformation metrics can be extracted from simulation results to provide a simplified description of individual chondrocyte responses. Simulations at the tissue–cell scale can be parallelized owing to the loosely coupled nature of the feed-forward approach. Verification studies illustrated the necessity of a second-order data passing scheme between scales and evaluated the role that the microscale representative volume size plays in appropriately predicting the mechanical response of the chondrocytes. The tools summarized in this study collectively provide a framework for high-throughput exploration of cartilage biomechanics, which includes minimally supervised model generation, and prediction of multiscale biomechanical metrics across a range of spatial scales, from joint regions and cartilage zones, down to that of the chondrocytes.

[1]  D Heinegård,et al.  Structure and biology of cartilage and bone matrix noncollagenous macromolecules , 1989, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[2]  Scott C. Sibole,et al.  Chondrocyte Deformations as a Function of Tibiofemoral Joint Loading Predicted by a Generalized High-Throughput Pipeline of Multi-Scale Simulations , 2012, PloS one.

[3]  W. Herzog,et al.  Elastic anisotropy of articular cartilage is associated with the microstructures of collagen fibers and chondrocytes. , 2002, Journal of biomechanics.

[4]  V. Kouznetsova,et al.  Multi-scale second-order computational homogenization of multi-phase materials : a nested finite element solution strategy , 2004 .

[5]  F. Guilak,et al.  The structure and function of the pericellular matrix of articular cartilage. , 2014, Matrix biology : journal of the International Society for Matrix Biology.

[6]  M J Rudert,et al.  A new sensor for measurement of dynamic contact stress in the hip. , 2014, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[7]  V. Mow,et al.  The mechanical environment of the chondrocyte: a biphasic finite element model of cell-matrix interactions in articular cartilage. , 2000, Journal of biomechanics.

[8]  A. Cole,et al.  Horizontally oriented clusters of multiple chondrons in the superficial zone of ankle, but not knee articular cartilage , 2002, The Anatomical record.

[9]  T. Quinn,et al.  Variation of cell and matrix morphologies in articular cartilage among locations in the adult human knee. , 2005, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[10]  J. McGarry,et al.  Computational investigation of in situ chondrocyte deformation and actin cytoskeleton remodelling under physiological loading. , 2013, Acta biomaterialia.

[11]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  In-situ measurements of chondrocyte deformation under transient loading. , 2007, European cells & materials.

[12]  F Eckstein,et al.  Age-related changes in the morphology and deformational behavior of knee joint cartilage. , 2001, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[13]  Zhongmin Jin,et al.  The influence of size, clearance, cartilage properties, thickness and hemiarthroplasty on the contact mechanics of the hip joint with biphasic layers☆ , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[14]  Scott C. Sibole,et al.  Extracellular matrix integrity affects the mechanical behaviour of in-situ chondrocytes under compression. , 2014, Journal of biomechanics.

[15]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Confocal microscopy indentation system for studying in situ chondrocyte mechanics. , 2009, Medical engineering & physics.

[16]  W Herzog,et al.  A novel method for determining articular cartilage chondrocyte mechanics in vivo. , 2011, Journal of biomechanics.

[17]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Pathomechanisms of cartilage destruction by mechanical injury. , 2005, Annals of anatomy = Anatomischer Anzeiger : official organ of the Anatomische Gesellschaft.

[18]  Arthur J Michalek,et al.  A numerical study to determine pericellular matrix modulus and evaluate its effects on the micromechanical environment of chondrocytes. , 2007, Journal of biomechanics.

[19]  T. Quinn,et al.  Cell and matrix morphology in articular cartilage from adult human knee and ankle joints suggests depth-associated adaptations to biomechanical and anatomical roles. , 2013, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[20]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Evaluation of a post-processing approach for multiscale analysis of biphasic mechanics of chondrocytes , 2013, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[21]  Victor H Barocas,et al.  Multiscale model predicts tissue-level failure from collagen fiber-level damage. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[22]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Multiphasic finite element framework for modeling hydrated mixtures with multiple neutral and charged solutes. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[23]  S. Gabriel,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part II. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[24]  E B Hunziker,et al.  Quantitative structural organization of normal adult human articular cartilage. , 2002, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[25]  A. Grodzinsky,et al.  Cartilage tissue remodeling in response to mechanical forces. , 2000, Annual review of biomedical engineering.

[26]  P. Causin,et al.  A multiscale approach in the computational modeling of the biophysical environment in artificial cartilage tissue regeneration , 2013, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[27]  Michele M. Temple,et al.  Age- and site-associated biomechanical weakening of human articular cartilage of the femoral condyle. , 2007, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[28]  F. Guilak,et al.  Mechanical regulation of chondrogenesis , 2013, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[29]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Automated generation of tissue-specific three-dimensional finite element meshes containing ellipsoidal cellular inclusions , 2015, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[30]  Jeffrey A Weiss,et al.  Subject-specific analysis of joint contact mechanics: application to the study of osteoarthritis and surgical planning. , 2013, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[31]  I. Tavares Human neural stem cell transplantation in spinal cord injury models: how far from clinical application? , 2013, Stem Cell Research & Therapy.

[32]  Harry E Rubash,et al.  In vivo tibiofemoral cartilage deformation during the stance phase of gait. , 2010, Journal of biomechanics.

[33]  R. Schneiderman,et al.  Depth-dependent compressive properties of normal aged human femoral head articular cartilage: relationship to fixed charge density. , 2001, Osteoarthritis and cartilage.

[34]  Benjamin J. Ellis,et al.  FEBio: finite elements for biomechanics. , 2012, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[35]  J. Buckwalter,et al.  Chondrocyte Senescence, Joint Loading and Osteoarthritis , 2004, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[36]  Jason P. Halloran,et al.  Multiscale Mechanics of Articular Cartilage: Potentials and Challenges of Coupling Musculoskeletal, Joint, and Microscale Computational Models , 2012, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[37]  Dan L. Bader,et al.  Anisotropic, Three-Dimensional Deformation of Single Attached Cells Under Compression , 2004, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[38]  Atlanta,et al.  Estimates of the prevalence of arthritis and other rheumatic conditions in the United States. Part I. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[39]  D. D’Lima,et al.  Aging-related differences in chondrocyte viscoelastic properties. , 2009, Molecular & cellular biomechanics : MCB.

[40]  R Huiskes,et al.  The role of computational models in the search for the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of articular cartilage. , 2005, Medical engineering & physics.

[41]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Importance of collagen orientation and depth-dependent fixed charge densities of cartilage on mechanical behavior of chondrocytes. , 2008, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[42]  Walter Herzog,et al.  Model-based estimation of muscle forces exerted during movements. , 2007, Clinical biomechanics.

[43]  Jukka S. Jurvelin,et al.  Composition of the pericellular matrix modulates the deformation behaviour of chondrocytes in articular cartilage under static loading , 2009, Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing.

[44]  P. Torzilli,et al.  Effect of Compressive Strain on Cell Viability in Statically Loaded Articular Cartilage , 2006, Biomechanics and modeling in mechanobiology.

[45]  Evaluation of a post-processing approach for multiscale analysis of biphasic mechanics of chondrocytes, DOI: 10.1080/10255842.2013.809711 , 2016, Computer methods in biomechanics and biomedical engineering.

[46]  W. Horton,et al.  Cellular, molecular, and matrix changes in cartilage during aging and osteoarthritis. , 2006, Journal of musculoskeletal & neuronal interactions.

[47]  Ahmet Erdemir,et al.  Adaptive Surrogate Modeling for Expedited Estimation of Nonlinear Tissue Properties Through Inverse Finite Element Analysis , 2011, Annals of Biomedical Engineering.

[48]  Jessica M Deneweth,et al.  Heterogeneity of tibial plateau cartilage in response to a physiological compressive strain rate , 2013, Journal of orthopaedic research : official publication of the Orthopaedic Research Society.

[49]  Olaf Schenk,et al.  Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO , 2004, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[50]  W. Herzog,et al.  Mechanical behaviour of in-situ chondrocytes subjected to different loading rates: a finite element study , 2012, Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology.

[51]  F. Guilak,et al.  Depth-dependent anisotropy of the micromechanical properties of the extracellular and pericellular matrices of articular cartilage evaluated via atomic force microscopy. , 2013, Journal of biomechanics.

[52]  Olaf Schenk,et al.  Solving unsymmetric sparse systems of linear equations with PARDISO , 2002, Future Gener. Comput. Syst..

[53]  W. B. Zimmerman,et al.  INTRODUCTION TO COMSOL MULTIPHYSICS , 2006 .

[54]  Gerard A Ateshian,et al.  Modeling the matrix of articular cartilage using a continuous fiber angular distribution predicts many observed phenomena. , 2009, Journal of biomechanical engineering.

[55]  S. Delp,et al.  A modeling framework to estimate patellofemoral joint cartilage stress in vivo. , 2005, Medicine and science in sports and exercise.

[56]  P J Laz,et al.  A review of probabilistic analysis in orthopaedic biomechanics , 2010, Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part H, Journal of engineering in medicine.