Factors affecting microbial fuel cell acclimation and operation in temperate climates.

For the successful scale-up of microbial fuel cell (MFC) systems, enrichment strategies are required that not only maximise reactor performance but also allow anodic biofilms to be robust to environmental change. Cluster analysis of Denaturing Gradient Gel Electrophoresis community fingerprints showed that anodic biofilms were enriched according to substrate type and temperature. Acetate produced the highest power density of 7.2 W m(-3) and butyrate the lowest at 0.29 W m(-3), but it was also found that the trophic conditions used to acclimate the electrogenic biofilms also determined the MFC response to different substrate types, with both acetate and butyrate substrates recording power densities of 1.07 and 1.0 W m(-3) respectively in a sucrose enriched reactor. When temperature perturbations were introduced to investigate the stability of the different substrate acclimated electrogenic biofilms, the 20 °C acclimated acetate reactor was unaffected by 10 °C operation but all reactors acclimated at 35 °C were adversely affected. When the operating temperature was raised back to 35 °C both the acetate and butyrate reactors recovered electrogenic activity but the sucrose reactor did not. It is thought that this was due to the more complex syntropic interactions that are required to occur when metabolising more complex substrate types.

[1]  L. Raskin,et al.  Diversity and dynamics of microbial communities in engineered environments and their implications for process stability. , 2003, Current opinion in biotechnology.

[2]  David C. Stuckey,et al.  TREATMENT OF DILUTE WASTEWATER USING AN ANAEROBIC BAFFLED REACTOR: EFFECT OF LOW TEMPERATURE , 2000 .

[3]  Kees Roest,et al.  Community analysis of a full-scale anaerobic bioreactor treating paper mill wastewater. , 2005, Systematic and applied microbiology.

[4]  Bruce E Logan,et al.  Electricity generation of single-chamber microbial fuel cells at low temperatures. , 2011, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[5]  Sokhee P. Jung,et al.  Comparison of anode bacterial communities and performance in microbial fuel cells with different electron donors , 2007, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[6]  David M. Bagley,et al.  Experimental Determination of Energy Content of Unknown Organics in Municipal Wastewater Streams , 2004 .

[7]  Hong Liu,et al.  Production of electricity from acetate or butyrate using a single-chamber microbial fuel cell. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[8]  P. Parameswaran,et al.  Evaluation of energy-conversion efficiencies in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) utilizing fermentable and non-fermentable substrates. , 2008, Water research.

[9]  In S. Kim,et al.  Effect of different substrates on the performance, bacterial diversity, and bacterial viability in microbial fuel cells. , 2009, Bioresource technology.

[10]  G Lettinga,et al.  Challenge of psychrophilic anaerobic wastewater treatment. , 2001, Trends in biotechnology.

[11]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  How to get more out of molecular fingerprints: practical tools for microbial ecology. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[12]  Richard M. Dinsdale,et al.  The influence of psychrophilic and mesophilic start-up temperature on microbial fuel cell system performance , 2011 .

[13]  Sean F. Covalla,et al.  Power output and columbic efficiencies from biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens comparable to mixed community microbial fuel cells. , 2008, Environmental microbiology.

[14]  D. Pant,et al.  A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. , 2010, Bioresource technology.

[15]  B. Logan,et al.  Performance of a pilot-scale continuous flow microbial electrolysis cell fed winery wastewater , 2011, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[16]  Stefano Freguia,et al.  Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. , 2006, Environmental science & technology.

[17]  Willy Verstraete,et al.  Tubular microbial fuel cells for efficient electricity generation. , 2005, Environmental science & technology.

[18]  Uwe Schröder,et al.  Electroactive mixed culture biofilms in microbial bioelectrochemical systems: the role of temperature for biofilm formation and performance. , 2010, Biosensors & bioelectronics.

[19]  Byung Hong Kim,et al.  Use of acetate for enrichment of electrochemically active microorganisms and their 16S rDNA analyses. , 2003, FEMS microbiology letters.