Category Preservation and Proximity versus Phonetic Approximation in Loanword Adaptation

In this article, we argue that loanword adaptation is overwhelmingly phonological and that phonetic approximation plays a limited role in the sound changes that loanwords undergo. Explicit criteria are used to compare the predictions of the phonetic approximation and phonological stances against 12 large corpora of recent English and French loanwords in several different languages. We show that category proximity is overwhelmingly preferred over perceptual proximity and that typical L2 perception/interpretation errors are not reflected in the adaptations of the loanwords of this database. Borrowers accurately identify L2 sound categories, operating on the mental representation of an L2 sound, not directly on its surface phonetic form.

[1]  Ian R. A. MacKay,et al.  Phonetics: The Science of Speech Production , 1987 .

[2]  Carole Paradis The unnatural /Cju/ (< foreign /Cy/) sequence in Russian loanwords: A problem for the perceptual view , 2006 .

[3]  Michael Kenstowicz,et al.  Issues in loanword adaptation: A case study from Thai , 2006 .

[4]  John Laver,et al.  Principles of Phonetics: Principles of transcription , 1994 .

[5]  P. Ladefoged Vowels and consonants : an introduction to the sounds of languages , 2001 .

[6]  S. Peperkamp,et al.  The influence of orthography on loanword adaptations , 2006 .

[7]  Loanwords and Phonological Methodology , 1987 .

[8]  L Williams,et al.  The modification of speech perception and production in second-language learning , 1979, Perception & psychophysics.

[9]  R. S. Day Temporal Order Perception of a Reversible Phoneme Cluster , 1970 .

[10]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The Study of Second Language Acquisition , 1994 .

[11]  José Benkí,et al.  Evidence for phonological categories from speech perception , 1998 .

[12]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Guttural deletion in loanwords , 2001, Phonology.

[13]  François Grosjean,et al.  Life with two languages :an introduction to bilingualism , 1984 .

[14]  J E Flege,et al.  Linguistic and Developmental Effects on the Production and Perception of Stop Consonants , 1986, Phonetica.

[15]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  On the Description of Phonic Interference , 1957 .

[16]  James E. Cutting,et al.  The Perception of Stop-Liquid Clusters in Phonological Fusion. , 1975 .

[17]  Jack Ryalls A basic introduction to speech perception , 1996 .

[18]  Pierre Martin Le système vocalique du français du Québec. De l'acoustique à la phonologie , 2002 .

[19]  Uriel Weinreich,et al.  Languages in Contact: French, German and Romansh in twentieth-century Switzerland , 2011 .

[20]  J. Vachek С. ENGLISH PHONOLOGY , 1976 .

[21]  D. Sankoff,et al.  The social correlates and linguistic processes of lexical borrowing and assimilation , 1988 .

[22]  Albert Valdman,et al.  Papers in linguistics and phonetics to the memory of Pierre Delattre , 1972 .

[23]  W. Strange,et al.  Effects of phonological and phonetic factors on cross-language perception of approximants , 1992 .

[24]  R. M. Cena When is a phonological generalization psychologically real , 1978 .

[25]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Preservation and minimality in loanword adaptation , 1997, Journal of Linguistics.

[26]  Fredric Field,et al.  Linguistic Borrowing in Bilingual Contexts , 2002 .

[27]  W. M. Fischer,et al.  Intervocalic Flapping in English , 1976 .

[28]  Robert A. Fox,et al.  Dental flaps, vowel duration and rule ordering in American English , 1977 .

[29]  Gerald Kelly,et al.  How to Teach Pronunciation , 2001 .

[30]  J E Cutting,et al.  Aspects of phonological fusion. , 1975, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[31]  Pierre Delattre,et al.  Studies in Comparative Phonetics , 1981 .

[32]  Jeroen van de Weijer,et al.  Optimality theory : phonology, syntax, and acquisition , 2000 .

[33]  Einar Haugen,et al.  The analysis of linguistic borrowing. , 1950 .

[34]  I. R. MacKay,et al.  Category restructuring during second-language speech acquisition. , 2001, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  Nancy C. Dorian,et al.  Bilinguality and Bilingualism , 1990 .

[36]  F. V. Coetsem Loan phonology and the two transfer types in language contact , 1988 .

[37]  V. Fromkin Errors in linguistic performance: Slips of the tongue , 1982 .

[38]  S. Davis,et al.  Phonetics versus phonology: English word final /s/ in Korean loanword phonology , 2006 .

[39]  L. Williams,et al.  The perception of stop consonant voicing by Spanish-English bilinguals , 1977 .

[40]  M. Mochizuki The identification of /r/ and /l/ in natural and synthesized speech , 1981 .

[41]  Moira Yip,et al.  The symbiosis between perception and grammar in loanword phonology , 2006 .

[42]  Moira Yip,et al.  Cantonese loanword phonology and optimality theory , 1993 .

[43]  W. Strange Speech perception and linguistic experience : issues in cross-language research , 1995 .

[44]  Christian Uffmann,et al.  Epenthetic vowel quality in loanwords: Empirical and formal issues , 2006 .

[45]  Daniel H.S. Silverman,et al.  Multiple scansions in loanword phonology: evidence from Cantonese , 1992, Phonology.

[46]  G. Hammond Cerebral control of speech and limb movements , 1990 .

[47]  A. Kaye Vowels and Consonants: An Introduction to the Sounds of Languages (review) , 2002 .

[48]  東京言語研究所,et al.  Three dimensions of linguistic theory , 1973 .

[49]  James Emil Flege,et al.  The Acquisition of Swedish Long vs. Short Vowel Contrasts by Native Speakers of English, Spanish and Estonian , 1999 .

[50]  Carole Paradis,et al.  Nasal vowels as two segments: Evidence from borrowings , 2000 .

[51]  M. Pitt,et al.  Phonological processes and the perception of phonotactically illegal consonant clusters , 1998, Perception & psychophysics.

[52]  Les emprunts linguistiques d'origine européenne en Fon (Nouveau Kwa, Gbe: Bénin) : une étude de leur intégration au plan phonético-phonologique , 2000 .

[53]  Sharon Peperkamp,et al.  Reinterpreting loanword adaptations: the role of perception , 2003 .

[54]  J. Flege,et al.  Production and perception of English stops by native Spanish speakers , 1987 .

[55]  S. Dart,et al.  Comparing French and English coronal consonant articulation , 1998 .

[56]  Carlos Gussenhoven,et al.  Loan Phonology: Perception, Salience, The Lexicon and OT , 2000 .

[57]  Pierre Delattre,et al.  An Acoustic and Articulatory Study of Vowel Reduction in Four Languages. , 1969 .

[58]  G. Nathan On second-language acquisition of voiced stops , 1987 .

[59]  A. Calabrese A constraint-based theory of phonological markedness and simplification procedures , 1995 .

[60]  On Sonority and Salience: A Reply to Nikièma , 2002, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[61]  P. Ladefoged,et al.  The sounds of the world's languages , 1996 .

[62]  Emmanuel Dupoux,et al.  Loanword adaptations : three problems for phonology ( and a psycholinguistic solution ) , 2001 .

[63]  M. Monnot,et al.  A COMPARISON OF SPANISH SINGLE-TAP /r/ WITH AMERICAN /t/ AND /d/ IN POST-STRESS INTERVOCALIC POSITION , 1972 .

[64]  V. Gracco,et al.  Characteristics od speech as a motor control system , 1990 .

[65]  J. Archibald Phonological Acquisition and Phonological Theory , 1996 .

[66]  Donald J. Sharf,et al.  Phonetic Analysis of Normal and Abnormal Speech , 1991 .

[67]  E. Haugen,et al.  Languages in Contact: Findings and Problems , 1954 .

[68]  Ian Maddieson,et al.  Patterns of sounds , 1986 .

[69]  Charles H. Ulrich Loanword Adaptation in Lama: Testing the TCRS Model , 1997, Canadian Journal of Linguistics/Revue canadienne de linguistique.

[70]  J. Hufnagle The Speech Sciences , 1998 .

[71]  Martin J. Ball,et al.  Phonetics: The Science of Speech , 1999 .

[72]  Jay H. Jasanoff Language Contact, Creolization, and Genetic Linguistics , 1988 .

[73]  J. B. Lovins,et al.  Loanwords and the phonological structure of Japanese , 1973 .