Towards a proteomics meta-classification

There is a recognized need for a meta-classification that can serve as a foundation for more refined ontologies in the field of proteomics. Standard data sources classify proteins in terms of just one or two specific aspects. Thus SCOP (structural classification of proteins) is described as classifying proteins on the basis of structural features; SWlSS-PROT annotates proteins on the basis of their structure and of parameters like post-translational modifications. Such data sources are connected to each other by pairwise term-to-term mappings. However, there are obstacles which stand in the way of combining them together to form a robust meta-classification of the needed sort. We discuss some formal ontological principles which should be taken into account within the existing data sources in order to make such a meta-classification possible, taking into account also the gene ontology (GO) and its application to the annotation of proteins.

[1]  A Bairoch,et al.  SWISS-PROT: connecting biomolecular knowledge via a protein database. , 2001, Current issues in molecular biology.

[2]  Barry Smith,et al.  Framework for formal ontology , 1983 .

[3]  José L. V. Mejino,et al.  Representing Complexity in Part-Whole Relationships within the Foundational Model of Anatomy , 2003, AMIA.

[4]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[5]  B. Rost,et al.  Comparing function and structure between entire proteomes , 2001, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[6]  Michel Dojat,et al.  Application of Information Technology: A UMLS-based Knowledge Acquisition Tool for Rule-based Clinical Decision Support System Development , 2001, J. Am. Medical Informatics Assoc..

[7]  Barry Smith,et al.  Controlled vocabularies in bioinformatics: a case study in the gene ontology , 2004 .

[8]  Anton J. Enright,et al.  Classification schemes for protein structure and function , 2003, Nature Reviews Genetics.

[9]  A. Kumara,et al.  The Unified Medical Language System and the Gene Ontology : Some Critical Reflections , 2003 .

[10]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Role of Foundational Relations in the Alignment of Biomedical Ontologies , 2004, MedInfo.

[11]  Philip E. Bourne,et al.  Structural Bioinformatics: Bourne/Structural Bioinformatics , 2005 .

[12]  Barry Smith,et al.  The Universal Medical Language System and the Gene Ontology: Some Critical Reflections , 2003, KI.

[13]  P E Bourne,et al.  The Protein Data Bank. , 2002, Nucleic acids research.

[14]  K. Bretonnel Cohen,et al.  The Compositional Structure of Gene Ontology Terms , 2003, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[15]  Tim J. P. Hubbard,et al.  SCOP database in 2002: refinements accommodate structural genomics , 2002, Nucleic Acids Res..

[16]  Steffen Schulze-Kremer,et al.  The Ontology of the Gene Ontology , 2003, AMIA.

[17]  R A Stuart,et al.  Import of cytochrome c heme lyase into mitochondria: a novel pathway into the intermembrane space. , 1992, The EMBO journal.