The Effects of Direct Written Corrective Feedback on Improvement of Grammatical Accuracy of High- proficient L2 Learners

The present article reports the findings of a study that explored(1) whether direct written corrective feedback (CF) can help high-proficient L2 learners, who has already achieved a rather high level of accuracy in English, improve in the accurate use of two functions of English articles (the use of ‘a’ for first mention and ‘the’ for subsequent or anaphoric mentions); and (2) whether there are any differential effects in providing the two different types of direct written CF (focused and unfocused) on the accurate use of these grammatical forms by these EFL learners. In this study, sixty high-proficient L2 learners formed a control group and two experimental groups. One experimental group received focused written CF and the other experimental group received unfocused written CF, while the control group received no feedback. The statistical analyses indicated that both experimental groups did better than control group in the post-test, and moreover, focused group significantly outperformed unfocused one in terms of accurate use of definite and indefinite English articles. Overall, these results suggest that focused written CF is more effective than unfocused one, at least where English articles are concerned, in improving grammatical accuracy of high-proficient L2 writers and thus strengthens the case for teachers providing focused written CF.

[1]  Ken Sheppard.  Two Feedback Types: Do They Make A Difference? , 1992 .

[2]  Ann K. Fathman,et al.  Second Language Writing: Teacher response to student writing: focus on form versus content , 1990 .

[3]  Ute Knoch,et al.  Raising the Linguistic Accuracy Level of Advanced L2 Writers with Written Corrective Feedback. , 2010 .

[4]  Rod Ellis,et al.  The effects of focused and unfocused written corrective feedback in an English as a foreign language context , 2008 .

[5]  Steven J. Ross,et al.  SALIENCE OF FEEDBACK ON ERROR AND ITS EFFECT ON EFL WRITING QUALITY , 1986 .

[6]  J. Bitchener,et al.  The value of a focused approach to written corrective feedback , 2009 .

[7]  Huang Shi-xiang.  Academic Objections in EAP Writing——A Textual Analysis of "The Case Against Grammar Correction in L2 Writing Classes" , 2006 .

[8]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The relative effectiveness of different types of direct written corrective feedback , 2009 .

[9]  R. Schmidt.  The role of consciousness in second language learning , 1990 .

[10]  Donn Byrne,et al.  Progressive picture compositions , 1967 .

[11]  ZhaoHong Han.  A Study of the Impact of Recasts on Tense Consistency in L2 Output , 2002 .

[12]  Jean Chandler.  A response to Truscott , 2004 .

[13]  John Truscott,et al.  The effect of error correction on learners' ability to write accurately , 2007 .

[14]  Harriet D. Semke.  Effects of the Red Pen , 1984 .

[15]  Dana R. Ferris,et al.  ERROR FEEDBACK IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: HOW EXPLICIT DOES IT NEED TO BE? , 2001 .

[16]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The value of written corrective feedback for migrant and international students , 2008 .

[17]  D. Ferris.  THE CASE FOR GRAMMAR CORRECTION IN L2 WRITING CLASSES: A RESPONSE TO TRUSCOTT (1996) , 1999 .

[18]  Ute Knoch,et al.  The Contribution of Written Corrective Feedback to Language Development: A Ten Month Investigation. , 2010 .

[19]  Christine Goring. Kepner.  An Experiment in the Relationship of Types of Written Feedback to the Development of Second‐Language Writing Skills , 1991 .

[20]  Jean Chandler,et al.  THE EFFICACY OF VARIOUS KINDS OF ERROR FEEDBACK FOR IMPROVEMENT IN THE ACCURACY AND FLUENCY OF L2 STUDENT WRITING , 2003 .

[21]  Rod Ellis,et al.  A typology of written corrective feedback types , 2008 .

[22]  John Bitchener,et al.  Evidence in Support of Written Corrective Feedback. , 2008 .

[23]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Second Language Writing , 2003 .

[24]  Dana Ferris,et al.  Methodology in Language Teaching: Teaching Students to Self-Edit , 2002 .

[25]  Sarah Warshauer Freedman,et al.  Response to Student Writing , 1987 .

[26]  John Bitchener,et al.  The Effect of Different Types of Corrective Feedback on ESL Student Writing. , 2005 .

[27]  Ken Hyland,et al.  Feedback in Second Language Writing: Author index , 2006 .

[28]  Tim Ashwell,et al.  Patterns of Teacher Response to Student Writing in a Multiple-Draft Composition Classroom: Is Content Feedback Followed by Form Feedback the Best Method? , 2000 .

[29]  John Bitchener,et al.  Measuring the effectiveness of written corrective feedback: A response to “Overgeneralization from a narrow focus: A response to Bitchener (2008)” , 2009 .

[30]  Jack C. Richards,et al.  Methodology in Language Teaching: An Anthology of Current Practice , 2002 .

[31]  Younghee Sheen.  The Effect of Focused Written Corrective Feedback and Language Aptitude on ESL Learners´ Acquisition of Articles. , 2007 .

[32]  John F. Lalande.  Reducing Composition Errors: An Experiment , 1982 .

[33]  Barbara Kroll.  Second Language Writing. Research Insights for the Classroom. , 1990 .

[34]  David Wright,et al.  Differential effects of focused and unfocused written correction on the accurate use of grammatical forms by adult ESL learners , 2009 .

[35]  Danielle Guénette,et al.  Is feedback pedagogically correct?: Research design issues in studies of feedback on writing , 2007 .