Lumbar spine stability following hemilaminectomy, pediculectomy, and fenestration

Summary The destabilising effect of the removal of a single vertebral diarthrosis and the ipsilateral incision of the anuliis fibrosus at two adjacent vertebrae in the canine lumbar spine was quantified in an in vitro study. Lumbar spine segments, from the first to fourth lumbar vertebrae, were harvested from canine cadavers and divided into 1 control group (A) and 3 experimental groups - hemilaminectomy and fenestration (B), pediculectomy and fenestration (C), fenestration alone (D). Samples were subjected to 4 point lateral bending to point of failure. Stiffness, maximum bending moment (Mbmax), angular deformation and bending moment at 15° (Mb at 15°) variables were determined for each group. Hemilaminectomy and fenestration had the greatest decrease in Mbmax, Mb at 15° and stiffness and the greatest increase in angular deformation. Pediculectomy and fenestration and the fenestration alone procedures caused similar and significant reductions in Mb at 15° and stiffness. Pediculectomy was less destabilizing than hemilaminectomy, although this difference was not statistically significant. Fenestration is the common and greatest destabilizing factor. The removal of a single pedicle and accessory process has minimal destabilizing effects. The destabilizing effect of hemilaminectomy, pediculectomy and fenestration were quantified and compared in a study using canine cadaver spines. The combination of hemilaminectomy and fenestration produced the greatest degree of instability, but fenestration was the shared, most significant, single destabilizing factor.

[1]  J. Coates,et al.  Intervertebral disk disease. , 2000, The Veterinary clinics of North America. Small animal practice.

[2]  P. Shires,et al.  Biomechanics of the thoracolumbar vertebral column of dogs during lateral bending. , 1996, American journal of veterinary research.

[3]  Jiri Dvorak,et al.  On the Understanding of Clinical Instability , 1994, Spine.

[4]  S. Butterworth,et al.  Follow‐up study of 100 cases with thoracolumbar disc protrusions treated by lateral fenestration , 1991 .

[5]  P. Shires,et al.  A biomechanical study of rotational instability in unaltered and surgically altered canine thoracolumbar vertebral motion units , 1991 .

[6]  D. Knapp,et al.  A retrospective study of thoracolumbar disk fenestration in dogs using a ventral approach: 160 cases (1976 to 1986). , 1990 .

[7]  Fingeroth Jm Fenestration. Pros and cons. , 1989 .

[8]  J. Fingeroth Fenestration. Pros and cons. , 1989, Problems in veterinary medicine.

[9]  N. Jeffery Treatment of acute and chronic thoracolumbar disc disease by ‘mini hemilaminectomy’ , 1988 .

[10]  G. K. Smith,et al.  Spinal decompressive procedures and dorsal compartment injuries: comparative biomechanical study in canine cadavers. , 1988, American journal of veterinary research.

[11]  G. Saunders,et al.  Anatomy and function of the ligaments of the lower cervical spine in the dog. , 1981, American journal of veterinary research.

[12]  M. Vandevelde,et al.  Clinical and histologic evaluation of bilateral hemilaminectomy and deep dorsal laminectomy for extensive spinal cord decompression in the dog. , 1977, Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association.

[13]  N. O. Brown,et al.  Thoracolumbar disk disease in the dog: a retrospective analysis of 187 cases. , 1977 .

[14]  J. Doppman,et al.  Angiographic study of the effect of laminectomy in the presence of acute anterior epidural masses. , 1976, Journal of neurosurgery.