The N-Pact Factor: Evaluating the Quality of Empirical Journals with Respect to Sample Size and Statistical Power
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] F. Schmidt. Statistical Significance Testing and Cumulative Knowledge in Psychology: Implications for Training of Researchers , 1996 .
[2] P. Meehl. Theory-Testing in Psychology and Physics: A Methodological Paradox , 1967, Philosophy of Science.
[3] H. Pashler,et al. Is the Replicability Crisis Overblown? Three Arguments Examined , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[4] Deborah A. Prentice,et al. When small effects are impressive , 1992 .
[5] Nathaniel Rothman,et al. Assessing the probability that a positive report is false: an approach for molecular epidemiology studies. , 2004, Journal of the National Cancer Institute.
[6] Daniele Fanelli,et al. Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries , 2011, Scientometrics.
[7] Robert P. Abelson,et al. A Variance Explanation Paradox: When a Little is a Lot , 1985 .
[8] H. Pashler,et al. Two Failures to Replicate High-Performance-Goal Priming Effects , 2013, PloS one.
[9] B. Newell,et al. Priming Intelligent Behavior: An Elusive Phenomenon , 2013, PloS one.
[10] D. Mook,et al. In defense of external invalidity. , 1983 .
[11] S. Maxwell. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. , 2004, Psychological methods.
[12] Brian A. Nosek,et al. Replications of Important Results in Social Psychology: Special Issue of Social Psychology , 2013 .
[13] Jerome K. Vanclay,et al. Impact factor: outdated artefact or stepping-stone to journal certification? , 2011, Scientometrics.
[14] H. Pashler,et al. Priming of Social Distance? Failure to Replicate Effects on Social and Food Judgments , 2012, PloS one.
[15] Karl J. Friston. Ten ironic rules for non-statistical reviewers , 2012, NeuroImage.
[16] H. Pashler,et al. Editors’ Introduction to the Special Section on Replicability in Psychological Science , 2012, Perspectives on psychological science : a journal of the Association for Psychological Science.
[17] Jacob Cohen,et al. The statistical power of abnormal-social psychological research: a review. , 1962, Journal of abnormal and social psychology.
[18] C. F. Bond,et al. One Hundred Years of Social Psychology Quantitatively Described , 2003 .
[19] M. Barnett-Cowan,et al. Reproducibility Project: Psychology , 2012 .
[20] L. Bornmann,et al. A Reliability-Generalization Study of Journal Peer Reviews: A Multilevel Meta-Analysis of Inter-Rater Reliability and Its Determinants , 2010, PloS one.
[21] Dave Bartram,et al. Choosing the best method for local validity estimation: relative accuracy of meta-analysis versus a local study versus Bayes-analysis. , 2007, The Journal of applied psychology.
[22] Gerd Gigerenzer,et al. Do Studies of Statistical Power Have an Effect on the Power of Studies? , 2004 .
[23] Robert P. Abelson,et al. A Variance Explanation Paradox : When a Little is a Lot , 1985 .
[24] Scott E. Maxwell,et al. On the Post Hoc Power in Testing Mean Differences , 2005 .
[25] Harry T. Reis,et al. Publication Trends in JPSP: A Three-Decade Review , 1992 .
[26] G. Loewenstein,et al. Measuring the Prevalence of Questionable Research Practices With Incentives for Truth Telling , 2012, Psychological science.
[27] Jessica L. Tracy,et al. The practice of psychological science: searching for Cronbach's two streams in social-personality psychology. , 2009, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[28] Richard E. Lucas,et al. On the association between loneliness and bathing habits: nine replications of Bargh and Shalev (2012) Study 1. , 2015, Emotion.
[29] R. Krueger,et al. Handbook of research methods in personality psychology , 2007 .
[30] Leif D. Nelson,et al. False-Positive Psychology , 2011, Psychological science.
[31] G. Cumming. Understanding the New Statistics: Effect Sizes, Confidence Intervals, and Meta-Analysis , 2011 .
[32] Jacob Cohen,et al. THINGS I HAVE LEARNED (SO FAR) , 1990 .
[33] Leif D. Nelson,et al. Life after P-Hacking , 2013 .
[34] D. Heisey,et al. The Abuse of Power , 2001 .
[35] Jacob Cohen. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences , 1969, The SAGE Encyclopedia of Research Design.
[36] Etienne P LeBel,et al. Fearing the Future of Empirical Psychology: Bem's (2011) Evidence of Psi as a Case Study of Deficiencies in Modal Research Practice , 2011, Review of General Psychology.
[37] P. Meehl. Theoretical risks and tabular asterisks: Sir Karl, Sir Ronald, and the slow progress of soft psychology. , 1978 .
[38] Donald B. Rubin,et al. A Note on Percent Variance Explained as A Measure of the Importance of Effects , 1979 .
[39] U. Schimmack. The ironic effect of significant results on the credibility of multiple-study articles. , 2012, Psychological methods.
[40] W. Rakowski,et al. Effect of cost sharing on screening mammography in Medicare health plans. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.
[41] D. Funder,et al. Behavior as a function of the situation. , 1983 .
[42] P. Lachenbruch. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences (2nd ed.) , 1989 .
[43] Michael J. Marks,et al. The null hypothesis significance-testing debate and its implications for personality research. , 2007 .
[44] Reginald B. Adams,et al. Investigating Variation in Replicability: A “Many Labs” Replication Project , 2014 .
[45] J. Ioannidis. Why Most Published Research Findings Are False , 2005, PLoS medicine.
[46] E. Diener,et al. Personality research: components of variance attributable to the person and the situation. , 1975, Journal of personality and social psychology.
[47] Björn Brembs,et al. Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..
[48] Gregory Francis,et al. Too good to be true: Publication bias in two prominent studies from experimental psychology , 2012, Psychonomic Bulletin & Review.
[49] J. Rossi,et al. Statistical power of psychological research: what have we gained in 20 years? , 1990, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.