Modeling circulating fluidized bed downers

Abstract In this work, the hydrodynamic features of circulating fluidized beds (CFB) are integrated into a new computer simulation of a downer reactor. The mathematical model is based on fluid dynamic fundamentals and calculates the characteristic flow parameters (solids holdup, particle velocity and pressure gradient) along the downer axis. Cluster formation within the downer is expressed through the “Equivalent Agglomerate Diameter”, which is calculated through an empirical correlation that relates the average size of agglomerates to operating conditions. Pressure loss due to particle–wall friction is usually difficult to determine and a new empirical correlation is developed to estimate its value. The impact of particle–wall interactions can be discerned for a given set of operating conditions using the derived relationship. A correlation for estimating the particle–wall friction factor has also been developed based on available downer data and is presented in this work. Comparison of simulation results with downer flow data demonstrates successful model matching. The simulator accurately describes the hydrodynamic behavior of the gas–solid suspension within the downer both in the developing-flow as well as in the fully developed flow regions.

[1]  H. Schlichting Boundary Layer Theory , 1955 .

[2]  O. Molerus,et al.  Transient dynamics of solid concentration in downer fluidized bed , 1998 .

[3]  Yong Jin,et al.  Cocurrent downflow circulating fluidized bed (downer) reactors — A state of the art review , 1995 .

[4]  K. Nakamura,et al.  Vertical pneumatic conveying: An experimental study with particles in the intermediate and turbulent flow regimes , 1973 .

[5]  H. de Lasa,et al.  Particle clustering in down flow reactors , 2000 .

[6]  Yong Jin,et al.  Investigation on slip velocity distributions in the riser of dilute circulating fluidized bed , 1992 .

[7]  Todd Pugsley,et al.  Computer Simulation of the Performance of Fluid Catalytic Cracking Risers and Downers , 1994 .

[8]  Yong Jin,et al.  Hydrodynamics of cocurrent downflow circulating fluidized bed (CDCFB) , 1992 .

[9]  Wen-ching Yang,et al.  Estimating the Solid Particle Velocity in Vertical Pneumatic Conveying Lines , 1973 .

[10]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  A Comparison of Solids Fluxes in a Pair of Downer and Riser Reactors , 2000 .

[11]  Cedric Briens,et al.  Flow study of a 0.05 m diameter downflow circulating fluidized bed , 1998 .

[12]  Yong Jin,et al.  INVESTIGATION AND MODELING OF COCURRENT DOWNFLOW CIRCULATING FLUIDIZED BED (DOWNER) , 1998 .

[13]  H. de Lasa,et al.  Axial flow structure in the entrance region of downer fluidized bed: Effects of the distributor design , 1999 .

[14]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  Gas‐solids flow behavior: CFB riser vs. downer , 2001 .

[15]  K.-E. Wirth,et al.  Characterization of the flow pattern in a downer reactor , 1999 .

[16]  Jesse Zhu,et al.  Hydrodynamics in downflow fluidized beds (2): Particle velocity and solids flux profiles , 2000 .

[17]  Maurice A. Bergougnou,et al.  Investigation and Modelling of the Thermal Cracking of Waste Plastics Derived Oil in a Downer Reactor , 1998 .

[18]  O. Levenspiel,et al.  Fluidization engineering, 2nd edition , 1991 .

[19]  Wei Fei,et al.  A Dispersion Model for Fluid Catalytic Cracking Riser and Downer Reactors , 1997 .

[20]  Maurice A. Bergougnou,et al.  Hydrodynamics in downflow fluidized beds (1): solids concentration profiles and pressure gradient distributions , 1999 .

[21]  Jamal Chaouki,et al.  Hydrodynamics of circulating fluidized bed risers: A review , 1995 .