Quantification of edge loss of laser scanned data at spatial discontinuities

Laser scanning is a promising geometric data collection tool for construction, facility, and infrastructure management due to its fast sampling rate (tens of thousands of measurements per second) and millimeter-level accuracy. However, laser scanned data contains inaccurate data points at spatial discontinuities (object edges). These inaccurate points, known as mixed-pixels, are commonly removed from the data prior to geometric modeling or other downstream processes. The removal of points at the edges of objects introduces error in the geometry of the objects, and object dimensions extracted from the data, such as widths and heights, are usually smaller than the actual values. In many cases, these losses due to removal of points at edges can exceed measurement accuracy tolerances specified in inspection manuals. This paper proposes a model for estimating edge loss in laser scanned data by considering the impacts of various factors, such as scanning distance, density of data and incidence angle on the edge loss. Results from a series of controlled experiments showed that the developed model successfully predicted edge losses in most test cases. Evaluation results using data collected from job sites showed that this model reduced the measurement error due to edge loss by an average of 80% for dense point clouds collected by an amplitude modulated continuous wave (AMCW) scanner, and 38% for relatively sparse point clouds collected by a pulsed time of flight (PTOF) scanner. By adding the estimated edge losses back into the raw dimensional measurements using the developed model, it is possible to significantly improve the accuracy of related measurements and hence improve the accuracy of the geometric information extracted from laser scanned data.

[1]  Derek D. Lichti,et al.  Error Models and Propagation in Directly Georeferenced Terrestrial Laser Scanner Networks , 2005 .

[2]  Geraldine S. Cheok,et al.  Ladars for construction assessment and update , 2000 .

[3]  C. Fröhlich,et al.  Traffic Construction Analysis by Use of Terrestrial Laser Scanning , 2004 .

[4]  T. Rabbani,et al.  Accuracy analysis of the Leica HDS3000 and feasibility of tunnel deformation monitoring , 2005 .

[5]  Jianzhong Zhang,et al.  Using Scanning Lasers for Real-Time Pavement Thickness Measurement , 2005 .

[6]  Frédéric Bosché,et al.  Automated retrieval of 3D CAD model objects in construction range images , 2008 .

[7]  Alan M. Lytle Development of a Probabilistic Sensor Model for a 3D Imaging System , 2007 .

[8]  Carlos H. Caldas,et al.  Framework for Real-Time Three-Dimensional Modeling of Infrastructure , 2005 .

[9]  Edward J. Jaselskis,et al.  Improving transportation projects using laser scanning , 2005 .

[10]  David Barber,et al.  Geomatics Techniques for Structural Surveying , 2004 .

[11]  Martial Hebert,et al.  3D measurements from imaging laser radars: how good are they? , 1992, Image Vis. Comput..

[12]  Soon-Wook Kwon,et al.  Fitting range data to primitives for rapid local 3D modeling using sparse range point clouds , 2004 .

[13]  Cang Ye,et al.  Characterization of a 2D laser scanner for mobile robot obstacle negotiation , 2002, Proceedings 2002 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (Cat. No.02CH37292).

[14]  Bingbing Liu,et al.  Range error detection caused by occlusion in non-coaxial LADARs for scene interpretation , 2005 .

[15]  Martial Hebert,et al.  Analysis and Removal of Artifacts in 3-D LADAR Data , 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.

[16]  Christoph J. Witzgall,et al.  LASER SCANNING FOR CONSTRUCTION METROLOGY , 2001 .

[17]  S. V. Sreenivasan,et al.  A framework for rapid local area modeling for construction automation , 2002 .

[18]  M. Cree,et al.  Mixed pixel return separation for a full-field ranger , 2008, 2008 23rd International Conference Image and Vision Computing New Zealand.

[19]  Martial Hebert,et al.  3-D measurements from imaging laser radars: how good are they? , 1991, Proceedings IROS '91:IEEE/RSJ International Workshop on Intelligent Robots and Systems '91.

[20]  Youssef M A Hashash,et al.  Integration of Construction As-Built Data Via Laser Scanning with Geotechnical Monitoring of Urban Excavation , 2006 .

[21]  William C. Stone,et al.  Performance Analysis of Next-Generation LADAR for Manufacturing , 2004 .

[22]  Jie Gong,et al.  Data processing for real-time construction site spatial modeling , 2008 .

[23]  Paul A. Fuchs,et al.  APPLICATIONS OF LASER-BASED INSTRUMENTATION FOR HIGHWAY BRIDGES , 2004 .

[24]  Burcu Akinci,et al.  A formalism for utilization of sensor systems and integrated project models for active construction quality control , 2006 .

[25]  Penny Probert Smith,et al.  The Interpretation of Phase and Intensity Data from AMCW Light Detection Sensors for Reliable Ranging , 1996, Int. J. Robotics Res..

[26]  John F. Canny,et al.  A Computational Approach to Edge Detection , 1986, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[27]  Paul A. Fuchs,et al.  LASER-BASED INSTRUMENTATION FOR BRIDGE LOAD TESTING , 2004 .