Modeling energy use and emissions from North American shipping: application of the ship traffic, energy, and environment model.

The waterway network ship traffic, energy, and environment model (STEEM) is applied to geographically characterize energy use and emissions for interport ship movement for North America, including the United States, Canada, and Mexico. STEEM advances existing approaches by (i) estimating emissions for large regions on the basis of nearly complete data describing historical ship movements, attributes, and operating profiles of individual ships, (ii) solving distances on an empirical waterway network for each pair of ports considering ship draft and width constraints, and (iii) allocating emissions on the basis of the most probable routes. We estimate that the 172 000 ship voyages to and from North American ports in 2002 consumed about 47 million metric tonnes of heavy fuel oil and emitted about 2.4 million metric tonnes of SO2. Comparison with port and regional studies shows good agreement in total estimates and better spatial precision than current top-down methods. In quantifying limitations of top-down approaches that assume existing proxies for ship traffic density are spatially representative across larger domains, we find that International Comprehensive Ocean-Atmosphere Data Set (ICOADS) proxy data are spatially biased, especially at small scales. Emissions estimated by STEEM for ships within 200 nautical miles of the coastal areas of the United States are about 5 times the emissions estimated in previous studies using cargo as a proxy.

[1]  James J Corbett,et al.  Emissions from ships in the northwestern United States. , 2002, Environmental science & technology.

[2]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Effects of ship emissions on sulphur cycling and radiative climate forcing over the ocean , 1999, Nature.

[3]  Gjermund Gravir,et al.  Emission from international sea transportation and environmental impact , 2003 .

[4]  David G. Streets,et al.  Sulfur dioxide emissions and sulfur deposition from international shipping in Asian waters , 1997 .

[5]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Emissions from Waterborne Commerce Vessels in United States Continental and Inland Waterways , 2000 .

[6]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Geographical Characterization of Ship Traffic and Emissions , 2005 .

[7]  Gina Solomon,et al.  Pollution prevention at ports: clearing the air , 2004 .

[8]  E. S. Lindgren,et al.  Identification and assessment of ship emissions and their effects in the harbour of Göteborg, Sweden , 2001 .

[9]  J. Corbett,et al.  Statistical modeling of North Atlantic right whale migration along the mid-Atlantic region of the eastern seaboard of the United States , 2008 .

[10]  Paul J. Crutzen,et al.  Influence of NOx emissions from ships on tropospheric photochemistry and climate , 1999, Nature.

[11]  James J. Corbett,et al.  Considering alternative input parameters in an activity‐based ship fuel consumption and emissions model: Reply to comment by Øyvind Endresen et al. on “Updated emissions from ocean shipping” , 2004 .

[12]  J. Corbett,et al.  Updated emissions from ocean shipping , 2003 .

[13]  Øyvind Endresen,et al.  Improved modelling of ship SO2 emissions—a fuel-based approach , 2005 .

[14]  Ugur Kesgin,et al.  A study on exhaust gas emissions from ships in Turkish Straits , 2001 .

[15]  Øyvind Endresen,et al.  Substantiation of a lower estimate for the bunker inventory: Comment on “Updated emissions from ocean shipping” by James J. Corbett and Horst W. Koehler , 2004 .

[16]  David G. Streets,et al.  The growing contribution of sulfur emissions from ships in Asian waters, 1988–1995 , 2000 .

[17]  Paul S. Fischbeck,et al.  Global nitrogen and sulfur inventories for oceangoing ships , 1999 .

[18]  J. Corbett,et al.  Using Ship Speed and Mass to Describe Potential Collision Severity with Whales: An Application of the Ship Traffic, Energy and Environment Model (STEEM) , 2007 .