Effectiveness of successive interference cancellation and association policies for heterogeneous wireless networks

The densification of the network infrastructure is a possible solution to meet the explosive growth of mobile data demand. In the resulting interference-limited networks, interference management techniques are of interest to increase the spectral efficiency. Successive interference cancellation (SIC) provides modest gains when users are connected to the access point (AP) which provides the maximum average received signal power. In this paper, we focus on alternative association policies where SIC gives rise to a substantial performance gain. Specifically, we present a probabilistic framework to evaluate the performance of heterogeneous networks with SIC capabilities considering the minimum load association policy and range expansion. Numerical results show the effectiveness of SIC for these association policies.

[1]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Heterogeneous Cellular Networks with Flexible Cell Association: A Comprehensive Downlink SINR Analysis , 2011, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[2]  H. N. Nagaraja,et al.  Order Statistics, Third Edition , 2005, Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics.

[3]  Holger Paul Keeler,et al.  Equivalence and comparison of heterogeneous cellular networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 24th International Symposium on Personal, Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications (PIMRC Workshops).

[4]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Successive interference cancellation in uplink cellular networks , 2013, 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Signal Processing Advances in Wireless Communications (SPAWC).

[5]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  On decoding the kth strongest user in poisson networks with arbitrary fading distribution , 2013, 2013 Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers.

[6]  Cornelis H. Slump,et al.  Cognitive Small Cell Networks: Energy Efficiency and Trade-Offs , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[7]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  User Association for Load Balancing in Heterogeneous Cellular Networks , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[8]  Martin Haenggi,et al.  The aggregate throughput in random wireless networks with successive interference cancellation , 2013, 2013 IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory.

[9]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  Offloading in Heterogeneous Networks: Modeling, Analysis, and Design Insights , 2012, IEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications.

[10]  Moe Z. Win,et al.  A Mathematical Theory of Network Interference and Its Applications , 2009, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[11]  Z. Néda,et al.  On the size-distribution of Poisson Voronoi cells , 2004, cond-mat/0406116.

[12]  Jeffrey G. Andrews,et al.  A Tractable Approach to Coverage and Rate in Cellular Networks , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Communications.

[13]  Herbert A. David,et al.  Order Statistics , 2011, International Encyclopedia of Statistical Science.

[14]  Holger Paul Keeler,et al.  Using Poisson processes to model lattice cellular networks , 2013, 2013 Proceedings IEEE INFOCOM.

[15]  Tony Q. S. Quek,et al.  Enhanced intercell interference coordination challenges in heterogeneous networks , 2011, IEEE Wireless Communications.

[16]  Hao Tang,et al.  Offloading Performance of Range Expansion in Picocell Networks: A Stochastic Geometry Analysis , 2013, IEEE Wireless Communications Letters.