The Differential Effects of Solo Status on Members of High- and Low-Status Groups

Individuals experience solo status when they are the only members of their social category (e.g., gender or race) present in a group. Field research indicates that women and racial minorities are more debilitated by solo status than White men. However, lab oratory research indicates that men and women are equally debilitated as solos. We noted that laboratory studies introduced solo status during learning, whereas field research examined solo status at performance. Therefore, we predicted that high and low social status group members would be differentially influenced by solo status experienced during testing. In two laboratory experiments, men and women and African Americans and Whites experienced solo status during an oral examination. In Experiment 1, White women performed more poorly than White men taking the exam before an opposite-sex (but same-race) audience. In Experiment 2, African American women performed more poorly than White women taking the exam before an other-race (but same-gender) audience.

[1]  Kurt Kraiger,et al.  A meta-analysis of ratee race effects in performance ratings. , 1985 .

[2]  Mary Anne Devanna.  Men and Women of the Corporation , 1978 .

[3]  Alice H. Eagly,et al.  Are stereotypes of nationalities applied to both women and men , 1987 .

[4]  N. Ambady,et al.  Stereotype Susceptibility: Identity Salience and Shifts in Quantitative Performance , 1999 .

[5]  E. Goffman.  Stigma; Notes On The Management Of Spoiled Identity , 1964 .

[6]  Patrick T. Vargas,et al.  On The Role Of Encoding Processes In Stereotype Maintenance , 1995 .

[7]  B. Gutek,et al.  Sex Effects on Evaluation , 1980 .

[8]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Categorical and contextual bases of person memory and stereotyping. , 1978 .

[9]  C. Stangor,et al.  Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations , 1998 .

[10]  Janet K. Swim,et al.  The Differential Impact of Gender Ratios on Women and Men: Tokenism, Self-Confidence, and Expectations , 1995 .

[11]  Madeline E. Heilman,et al.  The impact of situational factors on personnel decisions concerning women: Varying the sex composition of the applicant pool , 1980 .

[12]  Reversing roles: a cognitive strategy for undoing memory deficits associated with token status. , 1989, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[13]  H. Garland,et al.  Attitudes Toward Women in Management and Attributions for Their Success and Failure in a Managerial Position. , 1977 .

[14]  Z. Kunda,et al.  Reactions to a black professional: motivated inhibition and activation of conflicting stereotypes. , 1999, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[15]  S. Spencer,et al.  Stereotype Threat and Women's Math Performance , 1999 .

[16]  Stephanie C. Payne,et al.  The incremental validity of interview scores over and above cognitive ability and conscientiousness scores , 2000 .

[17]  J. Yoder,et al.  “OUTSIDER WITHIN” THE FIREHOUSE , 1997 .

[18]  E. Heikes.  WHEN MEN ARE THE MINORITY: The Case of Men in Nursing , 1991 .

[19]  Delia S. Saenz,et al.  Memory deficits and memory surfeits: differential cognitive consequences of tokenism for tokens and observers. , 1985, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[20]  J. Baxter,et al.  Use of Free Responses and Cluster Analysis to Determine Stereotypes of Eight Groups , 1994 .

[21]  C. F. Bond.  The Next-In-Line Effect: Encoding or Retrieval Deficit? , 1985 .

[22]  C. Scherbaum,et al.  Marginal and mindful: deviants in social interactions. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[23]  E. M. Ott,et al.  Effects of the Male-Female Ratio at Work: Policewomen and Male Nurses , 1989 .

[24]  J. Dovidio,et al.  Relationship of solo status, academic rank, and perceived distinctiveness to job satisfaction of racial/ethnic minorities. , 1998, The Journal of applied psychology.

[25]  Douglas T. Hall,et al.  Effects of Job Incumbents' Race and Sex of Evaluations of Managerial Performance , 1976 .

[26]  J. Yoder,et al.  Is it All in the Numbers?: A Case Study of Tokenism , 1985 .

[27]  Robert S. Wyer,et al.  Gender Stereotypes and Social Identity: How Being in the Minority Affects Judgments of Self and Others , 1997 .

[28]  W. Clay Hamner,et al.  Race and Sex as Determinants of Ratings by Potential "Employers" in a Simulated Work Sampling Task. , 1974 .

[29]  Paul R. Sackett,et al.  Tokenism in performance evaluation: The effects of work group representation on male-female and White-Black differences in performance ratings. , 1991 .

[30]  Shelley E. Taylor,et al.  Salience, Attention, and Attribution: Top of the Head Phenomena , 1978 .

[31]  K. Pollak,et al.  Black and White Tokens in Academia: A Difference of Chronic Versus Acute Distinctiveness1 , 1998 .

[32]  W. Ickes.  Compositions in Black and White: Determinants of interaction in interracial dyads. , 1984 .

[33]  Delia S. Saenz,et al.  Token Status and Problem-Solving Deficits: Detrimental Effects of Distinctiveness and Performance Monitoring , 1994 .

[34]  C. Steele,et al.  Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. , 1995, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[35]  C. Judd,et al.  Evidence for racial prejudice at the implicit level and its relationship with questionnaire measures. , 1997, Journal of personality and social psychology.