Market Power with Interdependent Demand: Sale of Emission Permits and Natural Gas from Russia

With implementation of the Kyoto Protocol, Russia will most likely be able to exert market power in the emission permit market. But, as Russia is also a big exporter of fossil fuels, the incentives to boost the permit price may be weak. However, a significant share of Russia’s fossil fuel exports is natural gas. If a high permit price boosts the demand for natural gas through substitution from more polluting fuels and thus increase gas profits, this may increase the incentives to exert monopoly power in the permit market. Moreover, a large fossil fuel exporter may use its market position to influence the effective demand for permits. Hence, the relationship between permit income and fossil fuels exports runs in both directions. In this article, we explore the interdependence between the revenues from permit and fossil fuel exports both theoretically and numerically. A computable general equilibrium model suggests the fact that Russia as a big gas exporter has small effect on the incentives to exert monopoly power in the permit market. Moreover, Russia’s monopoly power in the permit market has a small, but non-negligible impact on the optimal level of Russian gas exports.

[1]  C. Hagem,et al.  Market power in the market for greenhouse gas emission permits : the interplay with the fossil fuel markets , 2002 .

[2]  Lars Mathiesen,et al.  Computational Experience in Solving Equilibrium Models by a Sequence of Linear Complementarity Problems , 1985, Oper. Res..

[3]  Christoph Böhringer,et al.  Assessing the Costs of Compliance: The Kyoto Protocol , 2002 .

[4]  Thomas F. Rutherford,et al.  Effects of Restrictions on International Permit Trading: The MS-MRT Model , 1999 .

[5]  Ulrich Bartsch,et al.  Fossil Fuels in a Changing Climate: Impacts of the Kyoto Protocol and Developing Country Participation , 2000 .

[6]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  Russia's Role in the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[7]  Sergey Paltsev,et al.  GTAP-Energy in GAMS: The Dataset and Static Model , 2004 .

[8]  R. Hahn Market Power and Transferable Property Rights , 1984 .

[9]  Bjart Holtsmark Russian behaviour in the market for permits under the Kyoto Protocol , 2003 .

[10]  K. Tangen,et al.  The Kyoto mechanisms and Russian climate politics , 2000 .

[11]  Christoph Böhringer Climate Politics from Kyoto to Bonn: From Little to Nothing? , 2001 .

[12]  John M. Reilly,et al.  Modeling non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Abatement , 2003 .

[13]  H. Westskog,et al.  Should Developing Countries Take on Binding Commitments in a Climate Agreement? An Assessment of Gains and Uncertainty* , 2005 .

[14]  Steffen Kallbekken A description of the Dynamic analysis of Economics of Environmental Policy (DEEP) model , 2004 .