Technology enhanced collaborative learning for learning of calculus

Conceptually and pedagogically, Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning (CSCL) has provided positive impact on mathematical learning. Much evidence have been documented on roles of CSCL approach in facilitating various types of learning and enabling new kind of learning experiences. In addition CSCL enable integration of technology in learning activities thus allowing for a “smooth learning flow”. Technology or computer-support learning allows more students to be actively thinking about information, making choices, and executing skills than is typical in teacher-centred learning. Moreover, when technology is used as a tool to support students in performing authentic tasks, the students are in the position of defining their goals, making design decisions, and evaluating their progress. The teacher's role changes as well. As students work on their technology-supported products, the teacher moves around the room, looking over shoulders, asking about the reasons for various design choices, and suggesting resources that might be used. This study aimed to investigate the motivational and cognitive factors enhanced with the integration of an interactive software Autograph in comparison to the conventional way for teaching Calculus at the secondary level. The Autograph has 2D and 3D graphing capabilities for topics such as functions, transformations, conic sections, vectors, slopes and derivatives. A quasi-experimental research design was used for this study with three phases implemented: 1) Introductory lesson on use of Autograph, 2) Integrated collaborative learning in using Autograph software, 3) Assessment using motivation questionnaire, achievement test and the Paas Mental Effort Rating Scale. Teaching and learning utilizing the Autograph software was found to be more superior significantly, t (77) = 2.58, p < .05 compared to the conventional learning mode. However, conventional strategy learners incurs low mental effort compared to used of Autograph. These findings also suggested that in utilizing any technological tools, a comprehensive measures addressing issues of instructional efficiency is crucial especially when involving large scale and formal implementation of technology integration in teaching and learning.

[1]  John Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory: Instructional Implications of the Interaction between Information Structures and Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[2]  Effandi Zakaria,et al.  PEDAGOGICAL USABILITY OF THE GEOMETER'S SKETCHPAD (GSP) DIGITAL MODULE IN THE MATHEMATICS TEACHING , 2010 .

[3]  Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi,et al.  A comparison of Malaysian secondary students perceived ease of use and usefulness of dynamic mathematical software. , 2008 .

[4]  D. Leutner,et al.  Direct Measurement of Cognitive Load in Multimedia Learning , 2003 .

[5]  Abdel K. Halabi,et al.  Empirical Evidence on the Relative Efficiency of Worked Examples versus Problem‐Solving Exercises in Accounting Principles Instruction , 2005 .

[6]  Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi,et al.  Instructional efficiency of utilization of autograph technology Vs handheld graphing calculator for learning algebra. , 2008 .

[7]  J. Sweller.  Instructional Design Consequences of an Analogy between Evolution by Natural Selection and Human Cognitive Architecture , 2004 .

[8]  R. A. Tarmizi,et al.  Guidance during Mathematical Problem Solving. , 1988 .

[9]  Fred Paas,et al.  Mental Effort and Performance as Determinants for the Dynamic Selection of Learning Tasks in Air Traffic Control Training , 2004 .

[10]  Ann Dowker,et al.  The development of arithmetic concepts and skills: Constructing adaptive expertise , 2003 .

[11]  F. Paas,et al.  Variability of Worked Examples and Transfer of Geometrical Problem-Solving Skills: A Cognitive-Load Approach , 1994 .

[12]  Maria Bannert,et al.  Managing Cognitive Load--Recent Trends in Cognitive Load Theory. Commentary. , 2002 .

[13]  Mara Alagic.  Technology in the Mathematics Classroom: Conceptual Orientation , 2003 .

[14]  Arthur J. Baroody.  The development of adaptive expertise and flexibility: The integration of conceptual and procedural knowledge , 2003 .

[15]  D. Gopher,et al.  On the Psychophysics of Workload: Why Bother with Subjective Measures? , 1984 .

[16]  Rohani Ahmad Tarmizi,et al.  Effect of utilizing Geometer’s Sketchpad on performance and mathematical thinking of secondary mathematics learners: An initial exploration , 2009 .

[17]  J. Merriënboer,et al.  Research on cognitive load theory and its design implications for e-learning , 2005 .

[18]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Measurement as a Means to Advance Cognitive Load Theory , 2003 .

[19]  Paul A. Kirschner,et al.  Cognitive load theory: implications of cognitive load theory on the design of learning , 2002 .

[20]  J. Sweller,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Complex Learning: Recent Developments and Future Directions , 2005 .

[21]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Load Theory and Instructional Design: Recent Developments , 2003 .

[22]  H. Ulrich Hoppe,et al.  Educational information technologies and collaborative learning , 2007 .

[23]  Fred Paas,et al.  Exploring Multidimensional Approaches to the Efficiency of Instructional Conditions , 2004 .

[24]  F. Paas,et al.  Cognitive Architecture and Instructional Design , 1998 .

[25]  Fred G. W. C. Paas,et al.  The Efficiency of Instructional Conditions: An Approach to Combine Mental Effort and Performance Measures , 1992 .