论文信息 - Sources of error in the graphical analysis of CFD results

Sources of error in the graphical analysis of CFD results

Graphical techniques are widely used to analyze CFD solutions. Some of these techniques have inherent errors, making them represent the solution imprecisely. An understanding of these errors is important for proper interpretation of the computed results and for comparison with experiments. Examples include contouring, plotting of vector fields, particle tracing, and computation of flow functions involving integration or differentiation.

Pieter Buning

[1] Terry L. Holst,et al. Computation of transonic separated wing flows using an Euler/Navier-Stokes zonal approach , 1986 .

[2] J. Steger,et al. A numerical study of three-dimensional separated flow past a hemisphere cylinder , 1987 .

[3] N. N. Mansour,et al. Numerical Simulation of the Tip Vortex Off a Low-Aspect-Ratio Wing at Transonic Speed , 1984 .

[4] Terry L. Holst,et al. Numerical solution of transonic wing flows using an Euler/Navier-Stokes zonal approach , 1985 .

[5] Stuart E. Rogers,et al. Flow visualization of CFD using graphics workstations , 1987 .

[6] Robert F. Sproull,et al. Principles in interactive computer graphics , 1973 .

[7] Jones Ta,et al. Diffraction methods for biological macromolecules. Interactive computer graphics: FRODO. , 1985, Methods in enzymology.

[8] P. G. Buning,et al. Graphics and flow visualization in computational fluid dynamics , 1985 .

[9] Robert P. Weston. Color graphics techniques for shaded surface displays of aerodynamic flowfield parameters , 1987 .