A Causal Role for Primary Motor Cortex in Perception of Observed Actions

It has been proposed that motor system activity during action observation may be modulated by the kinematics of observed actions. One purpose of this activity during action observation may be to predict the visual consequence of another person's action based on their movement kinematics. Here, we tested the hypothesis that the primary motor cortex (M1) may have a causal role in inferring information that is present in the kinematics of observed actions. Healthy participants completed an action perception task before and after applying continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS) over left M1. A neurophysiological marker was used to quantify the extent of M1 disruption following cTBS and stratify our sample a priori to provide an internal control. We found that a disruption to M1 caused a reduction in an individual's sensitivity to interpret the kinematics of observed actions; the magnitude of suppression of motor excitability predicted this change in sensitivity.

[1]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[2]  Karl J. Friston,et al.  Predictive coding: an account of the mirror neuron system , 2007, Cognitive Processing.

[3]  C. Becchio,et al.  The visible face of intention: why kinematics matters , 2014, Front. Psychol..

[4]  J. Kilner,et al.  Linking differences in action perception with differences in action execution , 2015, Social cognitive and affective neuroscience.

[5]  Alexander Kraskov,et al.  M1 Corticospinal Mirror Neurons and Their Role in Movement Suppression during Action Observation , 2013, Current Biology.

[6]  D. Patel,et al.  Inferring subjective states through the observation of actions , 2012, Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[7]  James M. Kilner,et al.  Learning to understand others' actions , 2010, Biology Letters.

[8]  Robert Oostenveld,et al.  Motor-cortical beta oscillations are modulated by correctness of observed action , 2008, NeuroImage.

[9]  S. Swinnen,et al.  Observing how others lift light or heavy objects: Which visual cues mediate the encoding of muscular force in the primary motor cortex? , 2010, Neuropsychologia.

[10]  Emmanuele Tidoni,et al.  Action Simulation Plays a Critical Role in Deceptive Action Recognition , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[11]  Cosimo Urgesi,et al.  Vicarious motor activation during action perception: beyond correlational evidence , 2013, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[12]  Dennis C. Tkach,et al.  Congruent Activity during Action and Action Observation in Motor Cortex , 2007, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[13]  Leonardo Fogassi,et al.  Mirror Neurons Responding to Observation of Actions Made with Tools in Monkey Ventral Premotor Cortex , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[14]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Functional organization of inferior area 6 in the macaque monkey , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[15]  James M. Kilner,et al.  More than one pathway to action understanding , 2011, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[16]  R. Lemon,et al.  What We Know Currently about Mirror Neurons , 2013, Current Biology.

[17]  Arjun K. Bansal,et al.  Decoding 3D reach and grasp from hybrid signals in motor and premotor cortices: spikes, multiunit activity, and local field potentials. , 2012, Journal of neurophysiology.

[18]  Antonia F. de C. Hamilton,et al.  Action Understanding Requires the Left Inferior Frontal Cortex , 2006, Current Biology.

[19]  A B Schwartz,et al.  Motor cortical representation of speed and direction during reaching. , 1999, Journal of neurophysiology.

[20]  U. Castiello,et al.  Toward You , 2010 .

[21]  J. Rothwell,et al.  The role of interneuron networks in driving human motor cortical plasticity. , 2013, Cerebral cortex.

[22]  James M Kilner,et al.  What is simulated in the action observation network when we observe actions? , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[23]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Action recognition in the premotor cortex. , 1996, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[24]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Force requirements of observed object lifting are encoded by the observer’s motor system: a TMS study , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[25]  M. Ridding,et al.  Determinants of the induction of cortical plasticity by non‐invasive brain stimulation in healthy subjects , 2010, The Journal of physiology.

[26]  F. Lacquaniti,et al.  Kinematic cues and recognition of self-generated actions , 2007, Experimental Brain Research.

[27]  Anne Springer,et al.  Repetitive TMS Suggests a Role of the Human Dorsal Premotor Cortex in Action Prediction , 2012, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[28]  U. Castiello,et al.  Does the intention to communicate affect action kinematics? , 2009, Consciousness and Cognition.

[29]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Theta Burst Stimulation of the Human Motor Cortex , 2005, Neuron.

[30]  Paul L. Furlong,et al.  Oscillatory Beta Activity Mediates Neuroplastic Effects of Motor Cortex Stimulation in Humans , 2013, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[31]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Motor facilitation during action observation: a magnetic stimulation study. , 1995, Journal of neurophysiology.

[32]  Juliana Dushanova,et al.  Neurons in primary motor cortex engaged during action observation , 2010, The European journal of neuroscience.

[33]  B. Cheeran,et al.  Inter-individual Variability in Response to Non-invasive Brain Stimulation Paradigms , 2014, Brain Stimulation.

[34]  A. P. Georgopoulos,et al.  Neuronal population coding of movement direction. , 1986, Science.