Health survey of former workers in a Norwegian coke plant: Part. 1. Estimation of historical exposures.

OBJECTIVE: To estimate historical exposure levels at a coke plant for all agents considered to be of importance for epidemiological studies of mortality and cancer incidence. METHODS: Time weighted average exposure (8 h TWA) was estimated based on personal measurements for polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and carbonaceous particulates. Exposure to quartz was estimated relative to the concentration of carbonaceous particulates. These estimates were adjusted for the use of airstream helmets. Exposure to other agents were estimated qualitatively (asbestos, benzene, and arsenic) or semi-quantitatively (carbon monoxide (CO) and heat) based on measurements and other indicators of exposure. RESULTS: Exposure to PAHs was highest for those who worked at the top of the ovens (300 micrograms/m3) in the period from 1970-6. The estimated PAH exposure was reduced to an average of 65 micrograms/m3 after the introduction of exposure control measures in 1976. The estimates for carbonaceous particulates ranged from 1 to 16 mg/m3, with the highest exposure for workers at the top of the ovens and at the coke screening station. CONCLUSIONS: The exposure of greatest concern in this study is to PAHs, but exposures to carbonaceous particulates and CO may also be of importance. The major limitations of this study are the lack of personal measurements before 1975 and the total lack of measurements for some of the exposed categories of workers. Despite these limitations, we think that this assessment reflects the actual exposures for most of the former employees. The assessment thus provides a reasonable tool for the subsequent epidemiological study and for future epidemiological follow up studies at the coke plant.

[1]  H Kromhout,et al.  An investigation of systematic changes in occupational exposure. , 1996, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[2]  N. Seixas,et al.  Exposure assessment in industry specific retrospective occupational epidemiology studies. , 1995, Occupational and environmental medicine.

[3]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Occupational epidemiology in the rubber industry: implications of exposure variability. , 1995, American journal of industrial medicine.

[4]  H Kromhout,et al.  Assessment and grouping of occupational magnetic field exposure in five electric utility companies. , 1995, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[5]  F. Jongeneelen,et al.  Reduction of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene excretion in coke-oven workers exposed to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons due to improved hygienic skin protective measures. , 1994, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[6]  F. Jongeneelen,et al.  Estimation of individual dermal and respiratory uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 12 coke oven workers. , 1993, British journal of industrial medicine.

[7]  E. Symanski,et al.  A comprehensive evaluation of within- and between-worker components of occupational exposure to chemical agents. , 1993, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[8]  H Kromhout,et al.  Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. , 1991, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[9]  B Laursen,et al.  Bias and random errors in historical data of exposure to organic solvents. , 1991, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[10]  S. Rappaport,et al.  Assessment of long-term exposures to toxic substances in air. , 1991, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[11]  John S. Evans,et al.  Subjective Estimation of Toluene Exposures: A Calibration Study of Industrial Hygienists , 1989 .

[12]  D. Slymen,et al.  Occupational exposure to coke oven emissions from 1979-1983. , 1986, Archives of environmental health.

[13]  David B. Clayson,et al.  IARC monographs on the evaluation of the carcinogenic risk of chemicals to humans. Volume 34, polynuclear aromatic compounds, part 3. Industrial exposures in aluminium production, coal gasification, coke production and iron and steel founding , 1985 .

[14]  A. Bjørseth,et al.  Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the work atmosphere. II. Determination in a coke plant. , 1978, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[15]  N Fannick,et al.  Exposure to coal tar pitch volatiles at coke ovens. , 1972, American Industrial Hygiene Association journal.

[16]  T. Kauppinen,et al.  Assessment of exposure in occupational epidemiology. , 1994, Scandinavian journal of work, environment & health.

[17]  Lester Vincent Cralley,et al.  Theory and rationale of industrial hygiene practice : the work environment , 1994 .

[18]  H. Kromhout,et al.  Agreement between qualitative exposure estimates and quantitative exposure measurements. , 1987, American journal of industrial medicine.

[19]  M. J. Evans,et al.  FACTORS AFFECTING THE SAMPLING OF AIRBORNE POLYCYCLIC AROMATIC HYDROCARBONS—A REVIEW , 1986 .

[20]  G. Davies,et al.  Measurement and analysis of occupational exposures to coke oven emissions. , 1986, The Annals of occupational hygiene.

[21]  U Ulfvarson,et al.  Limitations to the use of employee exposure data on air contaminants in epidemiologic studies , 1983, International archives of occupational and environmental health.