Risky driving behavior: a consequence of motion adaptation for visually guided motor action.

The authors examined the effect of adaptation to expansion on overtaking maneuvers in a driving simulator. Following driving on a straight empty road for 5 min, drivers initiated overtaking substantially later (220-510 ms) than comparable maneuvers made following viewing a static scene or following 5 min of curve driving. Following adaptation to contraction (produced by driving backward), observers initiated overtaking significantly sooner. The removal of the road texture significantly reduced the size of the adaptation effect. The authors propose that these changes in overtaking behavior are due to misestimation of the time headway produced by local adaptation of looming detectors that signal motion-in-depth for objects near the focus of expansion. This adaptation effect may increase the risk of rear-end collisions during highway driving.

[1]  D. Regan,et al.  Dissociation of discrimination thresholds for time to contact and for rate of angular expansion , 1993, Vision Research.

[2]  W. Warren,et al.  The role of central and peripheral vision in perceiving the direction of self-motion , 1992, Perception & psychophysics.

[3]  D Regan,et al.  Accuracy of estimating time to collision using binocular and monocular information , 1998, Vision Research.

[4]  D Regan,et al.  Adaptation to Incomplete Flow Patterns: No Evidence for ‘Filling-In’ the Perception of Flow Patterns , 1982, Perception.

[5]  D. Regan,et al.  Texture changes versus size changes as stimuli for motion in depth , 1983, Vision Research.

[6]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[7]  A H Tickner,et al.  Effect of prolonged driving on overtaking criteria. , 1970, Ergonomics.

[8]  D. Regan.  Visual information channeling in normal and disordered vision. , 1982, Psychological review.

[9]  A Heino,et al.  Choice of time-headway in car-following and the role of time-to-collision information in braking. , 1996, Ergonomics.

[10]  D. Regan,et al.  Looming detectors in the human visual pathway , 1978, Vision Research.

[11]  Michael A. Goodrich,et al.  Maintaining driver autonomy with collision avoidance systems: a satisficing approach , 1997, Proceedings of Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems.

[12]  D. Regan,et al.  Estimating the time to collision with a rotating nonspherical object , 2000, Vision Research.

[13]  G. Keppel,et al.  Design and Analysis: A Researcher's Handbook , 1976 .

[14]  G. Denton.  The influence of adaptation on subjective velocity for an observer in simulated rectilinear motion. , 1976, Ergonomics.

[15]  M L Matthews,et al.  A Field Study of the Effects of Drivers' Adaptation to Automobile Velocity , 1978, Human factors.

[16]  T. Heckmann,et al.  Circular Vection as a Function of the Relative Sizes, Distances, and Positions of Two Competing Visual Displays , 1989, Perception.

[17]  D Regan,et al.  Motion in depth: Adequate and inadequate simulation , 1999, Perception & psychophysics.

[18]  M. Cynader,et al.  The visual perception of motion in depth. , 1979, Scientific American.

[19]  G G Denton.  The Influence of Visual Pattern on Perceived Speed , 1980, Perception.

[20]  B J Frost,et al.  Linear Vection in the Central Visual Field Facilitated by Kinetic Depth Cues , 1992, Perception.

[21]  A. Pantle,et al.  Velocity-sensitive elements in human vision: initial psychophysical evidence. , 1968, Vision research.

[22]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[23]  Brindley Gs,et al.  Human colour vision. , 1957 .

[24]  D. Regan,et al.  Judging the time to collision with a simulated textured object: Effect of mismatching rate of expansion of object size and of texture element size , 1997, Perception & psychophysics.

[25]  G. Keppel.  Design and analysis: A researcher's handbook, 3rd ed. , 1991 .

[26]  R. Sekuler,et al.  Adaptation alters perceived direction of motion , 1976, Vision Research.

[27]  C Blakemore,et al.  On the existence of neurones in the human visual system selectively sensitive to the orientation and size of retinal images , 1969, The Journal of physiology.

[28]  N J Wade,et al.  A Selective History of the Study of Visual Motion Aftereffects , 1994, Perception.

[30]  D Regan,et al.  Adapting to expansion increases perceived time-to-collision , 1999, Vision Research.

[31]  Trevor Wilson,et al.  Driving strategies in overtaking , 1982 .

[32]  D. Regan,et al.  Visually guided collision avoidance and collision achievement , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[33]  G G Denton,et al.  Visual Motion Aftereffect Induced by Simulated Rectilinear Motion , 1977, Perception.

[34]  D Regan,et al.  Visually guided locomotion: psychophysical evidence for a neural mechanism sensitive to flow patterns. , 1979, Science.

[35]  P. Simmons,et al.  Seeing what is coming: building collision-sensitive neurones , 1999, Trends in Neurosciences.