A decision-making support system module for project manager selection according to past performance

Abstract This paper proposes a decision-making support system (DMSS) module for selecting project managers and demonstrates its implementation. The selection of a new project manager is based mainly on the past performance of potential managers, for example, on the relative performance evaluations they have received on projects managed by them in the past. Past projects are ranked in accordance with a ranking method. Project managers are ordered according to past project rank. The difference in quality between the past performance of the candidates is statistically examined using the Mann–Whitney–Wilcoxon U test. This enables the establishment of a subgroup of one or more preferred candidates, where the significance level of the statistical test has an impact on the subgroup size. The final candidate may be selected from this subgroup according to personal qualifications and suitability for the specific project. We demonstrated the use of such a DMSS module by an Israeli information technology company as part of their process to select a project manager. A ranking method within the Data Envelopment Analysis context (the Cross-Efficient method) was implemented with three inputs and four outputs selected for the project ranking.

[1]  S El-Sabaa,et al.  The skills and career path of an effective project manager , 2001 .

[2]  Thomas L. Saaty,et al.  Multicriteria Decision Making: The Analytic Hierarchy Process: Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation , 1990 .

[3]  Gad Vitner,et al.  Using data envelope analysis to compare project efficiency in a multi-project environment , 2006 .

[4]  Constantin Zopounidis,et al.  Multicriteria classification and sorting methods: A literature review , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[5]  B. Roy.  Decision-aid and decision-making , 1990 .

[6]  Jürgen Hauschildt,et al.  Realistic Criteria for Project Manager Selection and Development , 2000 .

[7]  Qing Cao,et al.  A case study approach for developing a project performance evaluation system , 2011 .

[8]  Edmundas Kazimieras Zavadskas,et al.  Multicriteria selection of project managers by applying grey criteria , 2008 .

[9]  Marta Fernández-Diego,et al.  Human resource allocation management in multiple projects using sociometric techniques , 2012 .

[10]  Gregory Gurevich,et al.  PERT-type projects: time–cost tradeoffs under uncertainty , 2013, Simul..

[11]  Lawrence M. Seiford,et al.  Data envelopment analysis: The evolution of the state of the art (1978–1995) , 1996 .

[12]  W. Eric Wong,et al.  Outlier elimination in construction of software metric models , 2007, SAC '07.

[13]  Madjid Tavana,et al.  A methodology for selecting portfolios of projects with interactions and under uncertainty , 2012 .

[14]  J. Lintner.  SECURITY PRICES, RISK, AND MAXIMAL GAINS FROM DIVERSIFICATION , 1965 .

[15]  Soroosh Nalchigar,et al.  Information technology project evaluation: An integrated data envelopment analysis and balanced scorecard approach , 2010, Expert Syst. Appl..

[16]  Zohar Laslo,et al.  Resource allocation under uncertainty in a multi-project matrix environment: Is organizational conflict inevitable? , 2008 .

[17]  Gregory Gurevich,et al.  A Simulation-Based Decision Support System for Managing Information Technology Project Portfolios , 2013, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[18]  Li-Ren Yang,et al.  The association among project manager's leadership style, teamwork and project success , 2011 .

[19]  P. Olomolaiye,et al.  Factors and procedures used in matching project managers to construction projects in Bangkok , 2002 .

[20]  Márcio de Oliveira Barros,et al.  Supporting risks in software project management , 2004, J. Syst. Softw..

[21]  Zohar Laslo,et al.  Activity time-cost tradeoffs under time and cost chance constraints , 2003 .

[22]  T. Sexton,et al.  Data Envelopment Analysis: Critique and Extensions , 1986 .

[23]  Chui‐Yu Liu,et al.  Stabilization coefficient of random variable , 1989 .

[24]  D. Golenko-Ginzburg.  On the Distribution of Activity Time in PERT , 1988 .

[25]  Abraham Charnes,et al.  Measuring the efficiency of decision making units , 1978 .

[26]  James E. Kelley,et al.  Critical-path planning and scheduling , 1899, IRE-AIEE-ACM '59 (Eastern).

[27]  R. Müller,et al.  Matching the project manager’s leadership style to project type , 2007 .

[28]  Thamaraiselvan Natarajan,et al.  Snapshot of Personnel Productivity Assessment in Indian IT Industry , 2011, Int. J. Inf. Technol. Proj. Manag..

[29]  Zohar Laslo,et al.  Matrix structures and performance: the search for optimal adjustment to organizational objectives , 2001, IEEE Trans. Engineering Management.

[30]  Joyce Fortune,et al.  Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model , 2006 .

[31]  Michael Z. Hanani,et al.  Combining the AHP and DEA methodologies for selecting the best alternative , 2011 .

[32]  Khalied Hyari,et al.  Utilizing data envelopment analysis to benchmark safety performance of construction contractors , 2010 .

[33]  Y. Gousty,et al.  An integrated approach to project evaluation and selection , 1988 .

[34]  Andrew R.J. Dainty,et al.  What makes a good project manager , 2005 .

[35]  James E. Kelley,et al.  Critical-Path Planning and Scheduling: Mathematical Basis , 1961 .

[36]  Zilla Sinuany-Stern,et al.  Review of ranking methods in the data envelopment analysis context , 2002, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[37]  Doo-Hwan Bae,et al.  An empirical analysis of software effort estimation with outlier elimination , 2008, PROMISE '08.

[38]  Avraham Shtub,et al.  R&D project evaluation: An integrated DEA and balanced scorecard approach ☆ , 2008 .

[39]  Karen J. Pettingell,et al.  Measuring Productivity of Software Projects: A Data Envelopment Analysis Approach , 1996 .