Looming Auditory Collision Warnings for Driving

Objective: A driving simulator was used to compare the effectiveness of increasing intensity (looming) auditory warning signals with other types of auditory warnings. Background: Auditory warnings have been shown to speed driver reaction time in rear-end collision situations; however, it is not clear which type of signal is the most effective. Although verbal and symbolic (e.g., a car horn) warnings have faster response times than abstract warnings, they often lead to more response errors. Method: Participants (N = 20) experienced four nonlooming auditory warnings (constant intensity, pulsed, ramped, and car horn), three looming auditory warnings (“veridical,” “early,” and “late”), and a no-warning condition. In 80% of the trials, warnings were activated when a critical response was required, and in 20% of the trials, the warnings were false alarms. For the early (late) looming warnings, the rate of change of intensity signaled a time to collision (TTC) that was shorter (longer) than the actual TTC. Results: Veridical looming and car horn warnings had significantly faster brake reaction times (BRT) compared with the other nonlooming warnings (by 80 to 160 ms). However, the number of braking responses in false alarm conditions was significantly greater for the car horn. BRT increased significantly and systematically as the TTC signaled by the looming warning was changed from early to veridical to late. Conclusion: Looming auditory warnings produce the best combination of response speed and accuracy. Application: The results indicate that looming auditory warnings can be used to effectively warn a driver about an impending collision.

[1]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  Driver Reaction Time to Tactile and Auditory Rear-End Collision Warnings While Talking on a Cell Phone , 2009, Hum. Factors.

[2]  Sinan Muftu,et al.  To go or not to go , 1990, Nature.

[3]  John D. Lee,et al.  Driver Distraction : Theory, Effects, and Mitigation , 2008 .

[4]  Zhi-Hong Mao,et al.  Detection of Driver Fatigue Caused by Sleep Deprivation , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics - Part A: Systems and Humans.

[5]  R. S. McGowan,et al.  An Acoustic Variable Specifying Time-to-Contact , 1991 .

[6]  Hong Z. Tan,et al.  To Go or Not to Go: Stimulus-Response Compatibility for Tactile and Auditory Pedestrian Collision Warnings , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Haptics.

[7]  H. Bastian.  Sensation and Perception.—I , 1869, Nature.

[8]  Cristy Ho,et al.  Multisensory In-Car Warning Signals for Collision Avoidance , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[9]  Rob Gray,et al.  Different strategies for using motion-in-depth information in catching. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[10]  Nitin Gupta,et al.  The effects of adverse condition warning system characteristics on driver performance: An investigation of alarm signal type and threshold level , 2002, Behav. Inf. Technol..

[11]  Y. Ian Noy,et al.  Ergonomics and Safety of Intelligent Driver Interfaces , 1997 .

[12]  Robert Gray,et al.  A Comparison of Tactile, Visual, and Auditory Warnings for Rear-End Collision Prevention in Simulated Driving , 2008, Hum. Factors.

[13]  Pratyush Bhatia.  Vehicle Technologies to Improve Performance and Safety , 2003 .

[14]  Ronald R. Knipling,et al.  Assessment of IVHS countermeasures for collision avoidance : rear-end crashes , 1993 .

[15]  Daniel V. McGehee,et al.  Collision Warning Timing, Driver Distraction, and Driver Response to Imminent Rear-End Collisions in a High-Fidelity Driving Simulator , 2002, Hum. Factors.

[16]  J Edworthy,et al.  The design and implementation of non-verbal auditory warnings. , 1994, Applied ergonomics.

[17]  J Edworthy,et al.  A user-centred approach to the design and evaluation of auditory warning signals: 1. Methodology. , 1995, Ergonomics.

[18]  Denis McKeown,et al.  Mapping Candidate Within-Vehicle Auditory Displays to Their Referents , 2007, Hum. Factors.

[19]  R Graham,et al.  Use of auditory icons as emergency warnings: evaluation within a vehicle collision avoidance application. , 1999, Ergonomics.

[20]  Johan Engstrom,et al.  Real-Time Distraction Countermeasures , 2009 .

[21]  Fred Sir Hoyle,et al.  The Black Cloud , 1957 .

[22]  James P Bliss,et al.  Alarm mistrust in automobiles: how collision alarm reliability affects driving. , 2003, Applied ergonomics.

[23]  David N. Lee,et al.  A Theory of Visual Control of Braking Based on Information about Time-to-Collision , 1976, Perception.

[24]  Robert Graham,et al.  The Format and Presentation of Collision Warnings , 1997 .

[25]  C. Spence,et al.  Assessing the effectiveness of various auditory cues in capturing a driver's visual attention. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Applied.

[26]  John G. Neuhoff,et al.  An Adaptive Bias in the Perception of Looming Auditory Motion , 2001 .

[27]  Gavriel Salvendy,et al.  Handbook of human factors. , 1987 .

[28]  W Schiff,et al.  Accuracy of judging time to arrival: effects of modality, trajectory, and gender. , 1990, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[29]  Simon K. Rushton,et al.  Weighted combination of size and disparity: a computational model for timing a ball catch , 1999, Nature Neuroscience.