Toward high-resolution global topography of Mercury from MESSENGER orbital stereo imaging: A prototype model for the H6 (Kuiper) quadrangle

Abstract We selected approximately 10,500 narrow-angle camera (NAC) and wide-angle camera (WAC) images of Mercury acquired from orbit by MESSENGER's Mercury Dual Imaging System (MDIS) with an average resolution of 150 m/pixel to compute a digital terrain model (DTM) for the H6 (Kuiper) quadrangle, which extends from 22.5°S to 22.5°N and from 288.0°E to 360.0°E. From the images, we identified about 21,100 stereo image combinations consisting of at least three images each. We applied sparse multi-image matching to derive approximately 250,000 tie-points representing 50,000 ground points. We used the tie-points to carry out a photogrammetric block adjustment, which improves the image pointing and the accuracy of the ground point positions in three dimensions from about 850 m to approximately 55 m. We then applied high-density (pixel-by-pixel) multi-image matching to derive about 45 billion tie-points. Benefitting from improved image pointing data achieved through photogrammetric block adjustment, we computed about 6.3 billion surface points. By interpolation, we generated a DTM with a lateral spacing of 221.7 m/pixel (192 pixels per degree) and a vertical accuracy of about 30 m. The comparison of the DTM with Mercury Laser Altimeter (MLA) profiles obtained over four years of MESSENGER orbital operations reveals that the DTM is geometrically very rigid. It may be used as a reference to identify MLA outliers (e.g., when MLA operated at its ranging limit) or to map offsets of laser altimeter tracks, presumably caused by residual spacecraft orbit and attitude errors. After the relevant outlier removals and corrections, MLA profiles show excellent agreement with topographic profiles from H6, with a root mean square height difference of only 88 m.

[1]  Clark R. Chapman,et al.  The MESSENGER mission to Mercury: Scientific objectives and implementation , 2001 .

[2]  P. Esposito,et al.  The occultation of Mariner 10 by Mercury , 1976 .

[3]  J. Oberst,et al.  Fault‐bound valley associated with the Rembrandt basin on Mercury , 2016 .

[4]  Erwan Mazarico,et al.  The gravity field, orientation, and ephemeris of Mercury from MESSENGER observations after three years in orbit , 2014 .

[5]  M. Zuber,et al.  Return to Mercury: A Global Perspective on MESSENGER's First Mercury Flyby , 2008, Science.

[6]  F. Scholten,et al.  Derivation and V alidation of High-Resolution Digital T errain Models fr om Mars Express HRSC Data , 2009 .

[7]  D. Tholen,et al.  Report of the IAU Working Group on Cartographic Coordinates and Rotational Elements: 2009 , 2011 .

[8]  David E. Smith,et al.  Large impact basins on Mercury: Global distribution, characteristics, and modification history from MESSENGER orbital data , 2012 .

[9]  K. Gwinner,et al.  Mercury's rotational parameters from MESSENGER image and laser altimeter data: A feasibility study , 2015 .

[10]  T. Watters,et al.  Planetary Tectonics: The tectonics of Mercury , 2009 .

[11]  C. H. Acton,et al.  Ancillary data services of NASA's Navigation and Ancillary Information Facility , 1996 .

[12]  Erick R. Malaret,et al.  The Mercury Dual Imaging System on the MESSENGER Spacecraft , 2007 .

[13]  F. S. Turner,et al.  Radius and limb topography of Mercury obtained from images acquired during the MESSENGER flybys , 2011 .

[14]  Donald B. Campbell,et al.  Mercury's moment of inertia from spin and gravity data , 2012 .

[15]  A. C. Cook,et al.  Mariner 10 stereo image coverage of Mercury , 2000 .

[16]  S. Hauck,,et al.  Distribution of large‐scale contractional tectonic landforms on Mercury: Implications for the origin of global stresses , 2015 .

[17]  Jürgen Oberst,et al.  Mercury׳s global shape and topography from MESSENGER limb images , 2014 .

[18]  A. M. Celâl Şengör,et al.  Mercury’s global contraction much greater than earlier estimates , 2014 .

[19]  Giampiero Naletto,et al.  Shape model, reference system definition, and cartographic mapping standards for comet 67P/Churyumov-Gerasimenko Stereo-photogrammetric analysis of Rosetta/OSIRIS image data , 2015 .

[20]  M. Zuber,et al.  The morphology of Mercury's Caloris basin as seen in MESSENGER stereo topographic models , 2010 .

[21]  David Eugene Smith,et al.  The low‐degree shape of Mercury , 2015 .

[22]  William E. McClintock,et al.  In-flight performance of MESSENGER's Mercury Dual Imaging System , 2009, Optical Engineering + Applications.

[23]  M. Zuber,et al.  Stereo topographic models of Mercury after three MESSENGER flybys , 2011 .

[24]  Jürgen Oberst,et al.  Measurement of the radius of Mercury by radio occultation during the MESSENGER flybys , 2011 .

[25]  David E. Smith,et al.  The Mercury Laser Altimeter Instrument for the MESSENGER Mission , 2007 .

[26]  G. Neumann,et al.  FIRST GLOBAL DIGITAL ELEVATION MODEL OF MERCURY , 2016 .

[27]  Xiaoli Sun,et al.  Calibration of the Mercury Laser Altimeter on the MESSENGER Spacecraft , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing.

[28]  J. Burns,et al.  Shapes of the saturnian icy satellites and their significance , 2007 .

[29]  David E. Smith,et al.  Topography of the Northern Hemisphere of Mercury from MESSENGER Laser Altimetry , 2012, Science.

[30]  P. Thomas,et al.  The shape and internal structure of Mimas , 1988 .

[31]  Jürgen Oberst,et al.  First MESSENGER orbital observations of Mercury's librations , 2015 .

[33]  F. Scholten,et al.  Mars Express HRSC Data Processing - Methods and Operational Aspects , 2005 .

[34]  J. Oberst,et al.  Co-registration of laser altimeter tracks with digital terrain models and applications in planetary science , 2013 .

[35]  L. Lara,et al.  Depth of faulting and ancient heat flows in the Kuiper region of Mercury from lobate scarp topography , 2012 .

[36]  K. Gwinner,et al.  High-Resolution Topography from MESSENGER Orbital Stereo Imaging — The H5 Quadrangle "Hokusai" , 2017 .