A partitioned update scheme for state‐parameter estimation of distributed hydrologic models based on the ensemble Kalman filter

[1] Sequential data assimilation methods, such as the ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), provide a general framework to account for various uncertainties in hydrologic modeling, simultaneously estimating dynamic states and model parameters with a state augmentation technique. But this technique suffers from spurious correlation for impulse responses, such as the rainfall-runoff process, especially in the case of high-dimensional state spaces containing various parameters. This paper presents a partitioned forecast-update scheme based on the EnKF to reduce the degree of freedom of the high-dimensional state space and to correctly capture covariances between states and parameters. In this update scheme, the parameter set is partitioned into several types according to their sensitivities, and each type of sensitive parameter is estimated in an individual loop by repeated forecast and assimilation. We test this scheme with a synthetic case and a distributed hydrologic model concerning the real case of the Zhanghe river basin in China. The results from the synthetic experiments show that this new scheme can retrieve optimal parameter values and represent the correlations in a more stable manner when compared with the standard state augmentation technique. The real case further demonstrates the robustness of the partitioned update scheme for state and parameter estimation owing to the low estimation errors of streamflow in the assimilation and the prediction periods.

[1]  S. Grunwald,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multivariable catchment models , 2006 .

[2]  G. Evensen Sequential data assimilation with a nonlinear quasi‐geostrophic model using Monte Carlo methods to forecast error statistics , 1994 .

[3]  R. Srinivasan,et al.  A global sensitivity analysis tool for the parameters of multi-variable catchment models , 2006 .

[4]  Keith Beven,et al.  Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology , 2001 .

[5]  Jon C. Helton,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling and the Propagation of Uncertainty in Analyses of Complex Systems , 2002 .

[6]  J. Zhu,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of land surface scheme states and parameters using the ensemble Kalman filter: identical twin experiments , 2011 .

[7]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  A Shuffled Complex Evolution Metropolis algorithm for optimization and uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model parameters , 2002 .

[8]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  General Review of Rainfall-Runoff Modeling: Model Calibration, Data Assimilation, and Uncertainty Analysis , 2009 .

[9]  You‐Kuan Zhang Stochastic Methods for Flow in Porous Media: Coping with Uncertainties , 2001 .

[10]  V. Ponce,et al.  Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1996 .

[11]  Xianhong Xie,et al.  Development and test of SWAT for modeling hydrological processes in irrigation districts with paddy rice , 2011 .

[12]  Geir Evensen,et al.  The Ensemble Kalman Filter: theoretical formulation and practical implementation , 2003 .

[13]  R. E. Rallison,et al.  Past, present, and future SCS runoff procedure , 1982 .

[14]  Jiang Zhu,et al.  Simultaneous estimation of land surface scheme states and parameters using the ensemble Kalman filter: identical twin experiments , 2011 .

[15]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  The Soil and Water Assessment Tool: Historical Development, Applications, and Future Research Directions , 2007 .

[16]  Qingyun Duan,et al.  An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction , 2006 .

[17]  Bernard L. Golding,et al.  Discussions and Closure: Runoff Curve Number: Has It Reached Maturity? , 1997 .

[18]  R. Koster,et al.  Assessing the Impact of Horizontal Error Correlations in Background Fields on Soil Moisture Estimation , 2003 .

[19]  G. Heuvelink,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling of Gaussian Random Fields , 1999, Technometrics.

[20]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Comparison of adaptive filtering techniques for land surface data assimilation , 2008 .

[21]  Michael A. West Mixture Models, Monte Carlo, Bayesian Updating and Dynamic Models , 1992 .

[22]  A. Weerts,et al.  Particle filtering and ensemble Kalman filtering for state updating with hydrological conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 2006 .

[23]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Shuffled complex evolution approach for effective and efficient global minimization , 1993 .

[24]  Peter C Young,et al.  Advances in real–time flood forecasting , 2002, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences.

[25]  Misgana K. Muleta,et al.  Sensitivity and uncertainty analysis coupled with automatic calibration for a distributed watershed model , 2005 .

[26]  Jeffrey G. Arnold,et al.  Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 , 2011 .

[27]  Peter A. Troch,et al.  Catchment-scale hydrological modeling and data assimilation , 2003 .

[28]  C. M. DeChant,et al.  Radiance data assimilation for operational snow and streamflow forecasting , 2011 .

[29]  Dongxiao Zhang,et al.  Investigation of flow and transport processes at the MADE site using ensemble Kalman filter , 2008 .

[30]  D. Hollinger,et al.  An improved state-parameter analysis of ecosystem models using data assimilation , 2008 .

[31]  James D. Annan,et al.  Parameter estimation in an intermediate complexity earth system model using an ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[32]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  Impact of Incorrect Model Error Assumptions on the Sequential Assimilation of Remotely Sensed Surface Soil Moisture , 2006 .

[33]  D. Kavetski,et al.  Confronting Input Uncertainty in Environmental Modelling , 2013 .

[34]  Jens Christian Refsgaard,et al.  Système Hydrologique Europeén (SHE): review and perspectives after 30 years development in distributed physically-based hydrological modelling , 2010 .

[35]  Hamid Moradkhani,et al.  Examining the effectiveness and robustness of sequential data assimilation methods for quantification of uncertainty in hydrologic forecasting , 2012 .

[36]  Peter A. Vanrolleghem,et al.  Sensitivity analysis for hydrology and pesticide supply towards the river in SWAT , 2005 .

[37]  Dong-Jun Seo,et al.  The distributed model intercomparison project (DMIP): Motivation and experiment design , 2004 .

[38]  Edzer J. Pebesma,et al.  Latin Hypercube Sampling of Gaussian Random Fields , 1999, Technometrics.

[39]  Gilbert T. Bernhardt,et al.  A comprehensive surface-groundwater flow model , 1993 .

[40]  T. Başar,et al.  A New Approach to Linear Filtering and Prediction Problems , 2001 .

[41]  Fang Liu Bayesian Time Series: Analysis Methods Using Simulation-Based Computation , 2000 .

[42]  Yuguo Chen,et al.  State and parameter estimation of hydrologic models using the constrained ensemble Kalman filter , 2009 .

[43]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Uncertainty assessment of hydrologic model states and parameters: Sequential data assimilation using the particle filter , 2005 .

[44]  Yan Chen,et al.  Data assimilation for transient flow in geologic formations via ensemble Kalman filter , 2006 .

[45]  Keith Beven,et al.  A manifesto for the equifinality thesis , 2006 .

[46]  D. McLaughlin,et al.  Hydrologic Data Assimilation with the Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2002 .

[47]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Effective and efficient global optimization for conceptual rainfall‐runoff models , 1992 .

[48]  C. Diks,et al.  Improved treatment of uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Combining the strengths of global optimization and data assimilation , 2005 .

[49]  Xin Li,et al.  An evaluation of the nonlinear/non-Gaussian filters for the sequential data assimilation , 2008 .

[50]  S. Sorooshian,et al.  Multi-model ensemble hydrologic prediction using Bayesian model averaging , 2007 .

[51]  Soroosh Sorooshian,et al.  Dual state-parameter estimation of hydrological models using ensemble Kalman filter , 2005 .

[52]  H. Moradkhani,et al.  Snow water equivalent prediction using Bayesian data assimilation methods , 2011 .

[53]  G. Evensen Data Assimilation: The Ensemble Kalman Filter , 2006 .

[54]  R. Ibbitt,et al.  Hydrological data assimilation with the ensemble Kalman filter: Use of streamflow observations to update states in a distributed hydrological model , 2007 .

[55]  Keith Beven,et al.  The future of distributed models: model calibration and uncertainty prediction. , 1992 .

[56]  Wade T. Crow,et al.  An adaptive ensemble Kalman filter for soil moisture data assimilation , 2007 .

[57]  Yuqiong Liu,et al.  Uncertainty in hydrologic modeling: Toward an integrated data assimilation framework , 2007 .

[58]  Xianhong Xie,et al.  Data assimilation for distributed hydrological catchment modeling via ensemble Kalman filter , 2010 .

[59]  Kuolin Hsu,et al.  Hydrological Modelling and the Water Cycle , 2008 .

[60]  D. Seo,et al.  Overall distributed model intercomparison project results , 2004 .