A Model of Research, Patenting, and Productivity Growth

I use the aggregate behavior of three indicators of technology (employ- ment of research scientists and engineers, patented inventions, and total fac- tor productivity) to identify a plausible model of endogenous technological change. In the US (as well as in other developed countries) research em- ployment and total factor productivity have both grown, while the rate of patenting has remained relatively flat. One interpretation of these facts is that: (i) patentable inventions are becoming increasingly difficult to discover as the quality of techniques in use increases, (ii) inventions which are patented represent percentage improvements on techniques currently in use, and (iii) the size of the economy is growing, making patents increasingly valuable and justifying increased research efforts devoted to discovering them. This pa- per presents a general equilibrium search theoretic model of invention which formalizes this view.

[1]  Charles I. Jones,et al.  Time Series Tests of Endogenous Growth Models , 1995 .

[2]  Samuel Kortum R & D Patents and the Progress of Technology in a Search Model , 1991 .

[3]  Michael W. Klein,et al.  Explaining the Duration of Exchange-Rate Pegs , 1994 .

[4]  Z. Griliches Research Expenditures and Growth Accounting , 1973 .

[5]  Jacques Mairesse,et al.  R&D Productivity: A Survey of Econometric Studies at the Firm Level , 1991 .

[6]  E. Mansfield Patents and Innovation: An Empirical Study , 1986 .

[7]  J. Eaton,et al.  International Patenting and Technology Diffusion , 1994 .

[8]  Jennifer F. Reinganum The timing of innovation: Research, development, and diffusion , 1989 .

[9]  William D. Nordhaus,et al.  An Economic Theory of Technological Change , 1969 .

[10]  S. Winter,et al.  Appropriating the Returns from Industrial Research and Development , 1987 .

[11]  Robert E. Evenson,et al.  A Stochastic Model of Applied Research , 1976, Journal of Political Economy.

[12]  Zvi Griliches,et al.  Issues in Assessing the Contribution of Research and Development to Productivity Growth , 1979 .

[13]  I. Cockburn,et al.  Racing To Invest? The Dynamics of Competition in Ethical Drug Discovery , 1994 .

[14]  R. Evenson,et al.  International Invention: Implications for Technology Market Analysis , 1984 .

[15]  J. Lanjouw,et al.  Patent Protection: Of What Value and for How Long? , 1993 .

[16]  Patrick Billingsley,et al.  Probability and Measure. , 1986 .

[17]  G. Grossman,et al.  Innovation and growth in the global economy , 1993 .

[18]  P. Romer Endogenous Technological Change , 1989, Journal of Political Economy.

[19]  E. Mansfield,et al.  Imitation Costs and Patents: An Empirical Study , 1981 .

[20]  Michael H. Davis,et al.  Intellectual Property-Patents, Trademarks And Copyright in a Nutshell , 1983 .

[21]  Z. Griliches Patent Statistics as Economic Indicators: a Survey , 1990 .

[22]  Kenneth L. Judd,et al.  On the Performance of Patents , 1985 .