Evaluating a modified Google user interface via screen reader

This paper describes the progress of a research project aimed at improving the usability of web search tools for blind users who interact via screen readers and voice synthesizers. In the first stage of research, specific guidelines were proposed for simplifying the interaction with search engines for the blind. To evaluate these criteria, they were applied to Google user interfaces, by re-implementing the search form as well as the results page. Finally, the redesigned interfaces were evaluated through remote testing with 12 totally blind users. The results highlighted how Google, although already accessible, may be further improved in order to simplify interaction for people with impaired vision.

[1]  Ergonomic requirements for office work with visual display terminals ( VDTs ) — Part 11 : Guidance on usability , 1998 .

[2]  Simeon Keates,et al.  Improving Web accessibility through an enhanced open-source browser , 2005, IBM Syst. J..

[3]  Marti A. Hearst,et al.  The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces , 2001, CSUR.

[4]  Helen Petrie,et al.  Remote usability evaluations With disabled people , 2006, CHI.

[5]  Junji Maeda,et al.  Accessibility designer: visualizing usability for the blind , 2004, Assets '04.

[6]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Improving search engine interfaces for blind users: a case study , 2006, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[7]  Jan Gulliksen,et al.  Guidelines, standards, methods and processes for software accessibility , 2003, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[8]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Increasing Usability of Search Engine Interfaces for the Blind , 2005 .

[9]  Ravi Kuber,et al.  Improving web accessibility using content-aware plug-ins , 2005, CHI EA '05.

[10]  Jean Scholtz,et al.  Adaptation of traditional usability testing methods for remote testing , 2001, Proceedings of the 34th Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[11]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Designing search engine user interfaces for the visually impaired , 2003, W4A '04.

[12]  Barbara Leporini,et al.  Increasing usability when interacting through screen readers , 2004, Universal Access in the Information Society.

[13]  Kent L. Norman,et al.  Levels of automation and user participation in usability testing , 2006, Interact. Comput..

[14]  Carole A. Goble,et al.  The travails of visually impaired web travellers , 2000, HYPERTEXT '00.

[15]  Anne R. Haake,et al.  Here, there, anywhere: remote usability testing that works , 2004, CITC5 '04.

[16]  John T. Kelso,et al.  Remote evaluation: the network as an extension of the usability laboratory , 1996, CHI.

[17]  Mary Beth Rosson,et al.  Scenario-based design , 2002 .

[18]  Jennifer Mankoff,et al.  Is your web page accessible?: a comparative study of methods for assessing web page accessibility for the blind , 2005, CHI.

[19]  Gregg C. Vanderheiden,et al.  Web content accessibility guidelines 1.0 , 2001, INTR.

[20]  H. Rex Hartson,et al.  Remote evaluation for post-deployment usability improvement , 1998, AVI '98.

[21]  Melody Y. Ivory,et al.  Search result exploration: a preliminary study of blind and sighted users' decision making and performance , 2004, CHI EA '04.

[22]  Allen Newell,et al.  The psychology of human-computer interaction , 1983 .

[23]  Vicki L. Hanson,et al.  A web accessibility service: update and findings , 2004, Assets '04.