HOLISMOKES
暂无分享,去创建一个
L. Leal-Taixé | S. Suyu | S. Taubenberger | K. Rojas | R. Cañameras | Tim Meinhardt | C. Lemon | S. Schuldt | E. Savary | R. Cañameras
[1] M. Radovich,et al. New High-quality Strong Lens Candidates with Deep Learning in the Kilo-Degree Survey , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[2] Zooniverse,et al. Survey of Gravitationally-lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI) , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[3] J. Frieman,et al. STRIDES: Spectroscopic and photometric characterization of the environment and effects of mass along the line of sight to the gravitational lenses DES J0408–5354 and WGD 2038–4008 , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[4] M. Huertas-Company,et al. Detecting outliers in astronomical images with deep generative networks , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[5] Sebastien Fabbro,et al. Comparison of Multi-class and Binary Classification Machine Learning Models in Identifying Strong Gravitational Lenses , 2020, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[6] F. Courbin,et al. HOLISMOKES , 2020, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[7] S. Suyu,et al. Survey of Gravitationally lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI) – V. Group-to-cluster scale lens search from the HSC–SSP Survey , 2020, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[8] P. Rosati,et al. On the Accuracy of Time-delay Cosmography in the Frontier Fields Cluster MACS J1149.5+2223 with Supernova Refsdal , 2020, The Astrophysical Journal.
[9] F. Courbin,et al. TDCOSMO. I. An exploration of systematic uncertainties in the inference of $H_0$ from time-delay cosmography , 2019, 1912.08027.
[10] C. Conselice,et al. Identifying strong lenses with unsupervised machine learning using convolutional autoencoder , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[11] S. Suyu,et al. Survey of Gravitationally lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI) , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[12] D. Gerdes,et al. STRIDES: a 3.9 per cent measurement of the Hubble constant from the strong lens system DES J0408−5354 , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[13] E. Ofek,et al. Magnification, dust and time-delay constraints from the first resolved strongly lensed Type Ia supernova iPTF16geu , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[14] R. Beaton,et al. The Carnegie-Chicago Hubble Program. VIII. An Independent Determination of the Hubble Constant Based on the Tip of the Red Giant Branch , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[15] Stefan Hilbert,et al. H0LiCOW – XIII. A 2.4 per cent measurement of H0 from lensed quasars: 5.3σ tension between early- and late-Universe probes , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[16] A. Myers,et al. Finding Strong Gravitational Lenses in the DESI DECam Legacy Survey , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[17] Yen-Ting Lin,et al. Second data release of the Hyper Suprime-Cam Subaru Strategic Program , 2019, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan.
[18] A. K. Qin,et al. An Extended Catalog of Galaxy–Galaxy Strong Gravitational Lenses Discovered in DES Using Convolutional Neural Networks , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[19] Stephen Serjeant,et al. Using convolutional neural networks to identify gravitational lenses in astronomical images , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[20] K. Lee,et al. Survey of gravitationally-lensed objects in HSC imaging (SuGOHI) , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[21] A. Riess,et al. Large Magellanic Cloud Cepheid Standards Provide a 1% Foundation for the Determination of the Hubble Constant and Stronger Evidence for Physics beyond ΛCDM , 2019, The Astrophysical Journal.
[22] J. Hjorth,et al. Magnified or multiply imaged? – Search strategies for gravitationally lensed supernovae in wide-field surveys , 2019, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[23] U. M. Noebauer,et al. Strongly lensed SNe Ia in the era of LSST: observing cadence for lens discoveries and time-delay measurements , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[24] S. Suyu,et al. Inner dark matter distribution of the Cosmic Horseshoe (J1148+1930) with gravitational lensing and dynamics , 2019, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[25] C. Heymans,et al. LinKS: discovering galaxy-scale strong lenses in the Kilo-Degree Survey using convolutional neural networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[26] Umaa Rebbapragada,et al. The Zwicky Transient Facility: Data Processing, Products, and Archive , 2018, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific.
[27] A. K. Qin,et al. Finding high-redshift strong lenses in DES using convolutional neural networks , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[28] M. Auger,et al. Low-mass halo perturbations in strong gravitational lenses at redshift z ∼ 0.5 are consistent with CDM , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[29] R. McMahon,et al. Gravitationally lensed quasars inGaia– III. 22 new lensed quasars fromGaiadata release 2 , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[30] Gregory M. Green,et al. dustmaps: A Python interface for maps of interstellar dust , 2018, J. Open Source Softw..
[31] F. Courbin,et al. Impact of the 3D source geometry on time-delay measurements of lensed type-Ia supernovae , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[32] Adam D. Myers,et al. Overview of the DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys , 2018, The Astronomical Journal.
[33] G. Hasinger,et al. The DEIMOS 10K Spectroscopic Survey Catalog of the COSMOS Field , 2018, 1803.09251.
[34] C. Fassnacht,et al. A search for gravitationally lensed quasars and quasar pairs in Pan-STARRS1: spectroscopy and sources of shear in the diamond 2M1134−2103 , 2018, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[35] M. Meneghetti,et al. The strong gravitational lens finding challenge , 2018, Astronomy & Astrophysics.
[36] M. Lombardi,et al. Measuring the Value of the Hubble Constant “à la Refsdal” , 2018, The Astrophysical Journal.
[37] Manda Banerji,et al. COSMOGRAIL: the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses - XVI. Time delays for the quadruply imaged quasar DES J0408−5354 with high-cadence photometric monitoring , 2018 .
[38] Ashley J. Ross,et al. The SDSS-IV Extended Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Baryon Acoustic Oscillations at Redshift of 0.72 with the DR14 Luminous Red Galaxy Sample , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.
[39] P. Schechter,et al. A Quadruply Lensed SN Ia: Gaining a Time-Delay...Losing a Standard Candle , 2017, 1711.07919.
[40] J. Richard,et al. The nature of giant clumps in distant galaxies probed by the anatomy of the cosmic snake , 2017, Nature Astronomy.
[41] Daniel Thomas,et al. The DES Bright Arcs Survey: Hundreds of Candidate Strongly Lensed Galaxy Systems from the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification and Year 1 Observations , 2017 .
[42] T. Collett,et al. Precise Time Delays from Strongly Gravitationally Lensed Type Ia Supernovae with Chromatically Microlensed Images , 2017, 1708.00003.
[43] Hiroyuki Ikeda,et al. Deep Optical Imaging of the COSMOS Field with Hyper Suprime-Cam Using Data from the Subaru Strategic Program and the University of Hawaii , 2017, 1706.00566.
[44] C. Rusu,et al. Discovery of the First Quadruple Gravitationally Lensed Quasar Candidate with Pan-STARRS , 2017, 1705.08359.
[45] J. Kneib,et al. Deep convolutional neural networks as strong gravitational lens detectors , 2017, 1705.07132.
[46] E. Le Floc'h,et al. Planck's dusty GEMS. IV. Star formation and feedback in a maximum starburst at z = 3 seen at 60-pc resolution , 2017, 1704.05853.
[47] Karl Glazebrook,et al. Finding strong lenses in CFHTLS using convolutional neural networks , 2017, 1704.02744.
[48] Nan Li,et al. Automated Lensing Learner: Automated Strong Lensing Identification with a Computer Vision Technique , 2017, The Astrophysical Journal.
[49] Research Center for the Early Universe,et al. Survey of Gravitationally-lensed Objects in HSC Imaging (SuGOHI). I. Automatic search for galaxy-scale strong lenses , 2017, 1704.01585.
[50] Y. Shu,et al. SDSS J1640+1932: a spectacular galaxy–quasar strong lens system , 2017, 1703.07495.
[51] B. Póczos,et al. CMU DeepLens: deep learning for automatic image-based galaxy–galaxy strong lens finding , 2017, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[52] M. Limousin,et al. Planck’s dusty GEMS - III. A massive lensing galaxy with a bottom-heavy stellar initial mass function at z = 1.5 , 2017, 1703.02984.
[53] N. R. Napolitano,et al. Finding strong gravitational lenses in the Kilo Degree Survey with Convolutional Neural Networks , 2017, 1702.07675.
[54] W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al. The Pan-STARRS1 Surveys , 2016, 1612.05560.
[55] R. J. Wainscoat,et al. The Pan-STARRS1 Database and Data Products , 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[56] P. A. Price,et al. Pan-STARRS Pixel Analysis: Source Detection and Characterization , 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[57] R. J. Wainscoat,et al. Pan-STARRS Pixel Processing: Detrending, Warping, Stacking , 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[58] P. Nugent,et al. HOW TO FIND GRAVITATIONALLY LENSED TYPE Ia SUPERNOVAE , 2016, 1611.09459.
[59] S. More,et al. Interpreting the Strongly Lensed Supernova iPTF16geu: Time Delay Predictions, Microlensing, and Lensing Rates , 2016, 1611.04866.
[60] Adam A. Miller,et al. iPTF16geu: A multiply imaged, gravitationally lensed type Ia supernova , 2016, Science.
[61] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphological classifications for 120 000 galaxies in HST legacy imaging , 2016, 1610.03068.
[62] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: Quantitative visual morphological classifications for 48 000 galaxies from CANDELS , 2016, 1610.03070.
[63] G. Meylan,et al. H0LiCOW - V. New COSMOGRAIL time delays of HE 0435-1223: H0 to 3.8 per cent precision from strong lensing in a flat ΛCDM model , 2016, 1607.01790.
[64] G. Meylan,et al. H0LiCOW – I. H0 Lenses in COSMOGRAIL's wellspring: program overview , 2016, 1607.00017.
[65] O. Fèvre,et al. THE COSMOS2015 CATALOG: EXPLORING THE 1 < z < 6 UNIVERSE WITH HALF A MILLION GALAXIES , 2016, 1604.02350.
[66] S.Paltani,et al. The VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey first data release: Spectra and spectroscopic redshifts of 698 objects up to zspec ~ 6 in CANDELS , 2016, 1602.01842.
[67] John E. Carlstrom,et al. DETECTION OF LENSING SUBSTRUCTURE USING ALMA OBSERVATIONS OF THE DUSTY GALAXY SDP.81 , 2016, 1601.01388.
[68] R. Nichol,et al. THE REDMAPPER GALAXY CLUSTER CATALOG FROM DES SCIENCE VERIFICATION DATA , 2016, The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series.
[69] Jian Sun,et al. Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition , 2015, 2016 IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR).
[70] N. Zacharias,et al. IDENTIFICATION OF 1.4 MILLION ACTIVE GALACTIC NUCLEI IN THE MID-INFRARED USING WISE DATA , 2015, 1509.07289.
[71] A. Myers,et al. THE SDSS-IV EXTENDED BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY: LUMINOUS RED GALAXY TARGET SELECTION , 2015, 1508.04478.
[72] T. Collett. THE POPULATION OF GALAXY–GALAXY STRONG LENSES IN FORTHCOMING OPTICAL IMAGING SURVEYS , 2015, 1507.02657.
[73] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Deep Learning , 2015, Nature.
[74] C. Lintott,et al. Space Warps II. New gravitational lens candidates from the CFHTLS discovered through citizen science , 2015, 1504.05587.
[75] Edwin Simpson,et al. Space Warps – I. Crowdsourcing the discovery of gravitational lenses , 2015, 1504.06148.
[76] Sander Dieleman,et al. Rotation-invariant convolutional neural networks for galaxy morphology prediction , 2015, ArXiv.
[77] A. Fontana,et al. Multiple images of a highly magnified supernova formed by an early-type cluster galaxy lens , 2014, Science.
[78] Brandon C. Kelly,et al. Data mining for gravitationally lensed quasars , 2014, 1410.4565.
[79] Cosmology,et al. THE SL2S GALAXY-SCALE LENS SAMPLE. V. DARK MATTER HALOS AND STELLAR IMF OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES OUT TO REDSHIFT 0.8 , 2014, 1410.1881.
[80] S. J. Lilly,et al. THE FMOS-COSMOS SURVEY OF STAR-FORMING GALAXIES AT z ∼ 1.6. III. SURVEY DESIGN, PERFORMANCE, AND SAMPLE CHARACTERISTICS , 2014, 1409.0447.
[81] Michael S. Bernstein,et al. ImageNet Large Scale Visual Recognition Challenge , 2014, International Journal of Computer Vision.
[82] A. Bolton,et al. THE SLOAN LENS ACS SURVEY. XII. EXTENDING STRONG LENSING TO LOWER MASSES , 2014, 1407.2240.
[83] M. Rossetti,et al. The structure of Abell 1351: a bimodal galaxy cluster with peculiar diffuse radio emission , 2014, 1405.4707.
[84] B. Garilli,et al. The VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey: ~10 000 galaxies with spectroscopic redshifts to study galaxy assembly at early epochs 2 < z ≃ 6 , 2014, 1403.3938.
[85] P. Marshall,et al. RingFinder: AUTOMATED DETECTION OF GALAXY-SCALE GRAVITATIONAL LENSES IN GROUND-BASED MULTI-FILTER IMAGING DATA , 2014, 1403.1041.
[86] P. Norberg,et al. Pan-STARRS1: Galaxy clustering in the Small Area Survey 2 , 2013, 1310.6366.
[87] Sergey E. Koposov,et al. Are group- and cluster-scale dark matter haloes overconcentrated? , 2013, 1308.6286.
[88] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 2: detailed morphological classifications for 304,122 galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2013, 1308.3496.
[89] Cosmology,et al. THE SL2S GALAXY-SCALE LENS SAMPLE. III. LENS MODELS, SURFACE PHOTOMETRY, AND STELLAR MASSES FOR THE FINAL SAMPLE , 2013, 1307.4764.
[90] L. Koopmans,et al. A low-mass cut-off near the hydrogen burning limit for Salpeter-like initial mass functions in early-type galaxies , 2013, 1306.2635.
[91] M. Auger,et al. The CASSOWARY spectroscopy survey: A new sample of gravitationally lensed galaxies in SDSS , 2013, 1302.2663.
[92] W. M. Wood-Vasey,et al. THE BARYON OSCILLATION SPECTROSCOPIC SURVEY OF SDSS-III , 2012, 1208.0022.
[93] M. Turatto,et al. Supernovae and their host galaxies. I. The SDSS DR8 database and statistics , 2012, 1206.5016.
[94] Edwin A. Valentijn,et al. The Kilo-Degree Survey , 2012, Experimental Astronomy.
[95] Michael C. Cooper,et al. THE ADVANCED CAMERA FOR SURVEYS GENERAL CATALOG: STRUCTURAL PARAMETERS FOR APPROXIMATELY HALF A MILLION GALAXIES , 2012, 1203.1651.
[96] J. P. McKean,et al. Gravitational detection of a low-mass dark satellite galaxy at cosmological distance , 2012, Nature.
[97] D. Thompson,et al. DISENTANGLING BARYONS AND DARK MATTER IN THE SPIRAL GRAVITATIONAL LENS B1933+503 , 2011, 1110.2536.
[98] S. Ravindranath,et al. CANDELS: THE COSMIC ASSEMBLY NEAR-INFRARED DEEP EXTRAGALACTIC LEGACY SURVEY—THE HUBBLE SPACE TELESCOPE OBSERVATIONS, IMAGING DATA PRODUCTS, AND MOSAICS , 2011, 1105.3753.
[99] U. Utah,et al. Two-dimensional kinematics of SLACS lenses – III. Mass structure and dynamics of early-type lens galaxies beyond z ≃ 0.1 , 2011, 1102.2261.
[100] Douglas P. Finkbeiner,et al. MEASURING REDDENING WITH SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY STELLAR SPECTRA AND RECALIBRATING SFD , 2010, 1012.4804.
[101] Elena Pierpaoli,et al. AN OPTICAL CATALOG OF GALAXY CLUSTERS OBTAINED FROM AN ADAPTIVE MATCHED FILTER FINDER APPLIED TO SLOAN DIGITAL SKY SURVEY DATA RELEASE 6 , 2010, 1011.0249.
[102] Bonn,et al. The properties of the interstellar medium within a star-forming galaxy at z= 2.3 , 2010, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society.
[103] S. Suyu,et al. The halos of satellite galaxies: the companion of the massive elliptical lens SL2S J08544−0121 , 2010, 1007.4815.
[104] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo 1: data release of morphological classifications for nearly 900 000 galaxies , 2010, 1007.3265.
[105] T. Schrabback,et al. J0454-0309: evidence of a strong lensing fossil group falling into a poor galaxy cluster , 2010, 1002.1080.
[106] Ucsb,et al. Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys , 2010, 1001.2037.
[107] A. Bolton,et al. THE SLOAN LENS ACS SURVEY. IX. COLORS, LENSING, AND STELLAR MASSES OF EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES , 2009, 0911.2471.
[108] A. Bolton,et al. THE STRUCTURE AND DYNAMICS OF MASSIVE EARLY-TYPE GALAXIES: ON HOMOLOGY, ISOTHERMALITY, AND ISOTROPY INSIDE ONE EFFECTIVE RADIUS , 2009, 0906.1349.
[109] M. Lombardi,et al. Photometric mass and mass decomposition in early-type lens galaxies , 2009, 0904.3282.
[110] A. Zacchei,et al. THE SECOND-GENERATION GUIDE STAR CATALOG: DESCRIPTION AND PROPERTIES , 2008, 0807.2522.
[111] Eduardo Serrano,et al. LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products , 2008, The Astrophysical Journal.
[112] A. Bolton,et al. Accepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal Preprint typeset using L ATEX style emulateapj v. 10/09/06 THE SLOAN LENS ACS SURVEY. V. THE FULL ACS STRONG-LENS SAMPLE 1 , 2022 .
[113] T. Schrabback,et al. AUTOMATED DETECTION OF GALAXY-SCALE GRAVITATIONAL LENSES IN HIGH-RESOLUTION IMAGING DATA , 2008, 0805.1469.
[114] C. Lintott,et al. Galaxy Zoo: morphologies derived from visual inspection of galaxies from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey , 2008, 0804.4483.
[115] Y. Mellier,et al. First Catalog of Strong Lens Candidates in the COSMOS Field , 2008, 0802.2174.
[116] D. Calzetti,et al. The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope Advanced Camera for Surveys Observations and Data Processing , 2007, astro-ph/0703095.
[117] Cea,et al. Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements , 2007, astro-ph/0702359.
[118] J. Rhodes,et al. The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. IV. The Mass Density Profile of Early-Type Galaxies out to 100 Effective Radii , 2007, astro-ph/0701589.
[119] D. Calzetti,et al. COSMOS: Hubble Space Telescope Observations , 2006, astro-ph/0612306.
[120] S. Maddox,et al. zCOSMOS: A Large VLT/VIMOS Redshift Survey Covering 0 < z < 3 in the COSMOS Field , 2006, astro-ph/0612291.
[121] S. Seitz,et al. The Sizes of Galaxy Halos in Galaxy Cluster Abell 1689 , 2006, astro-ph/0611078.
[122] Gepi,et al. The CFHTLS strong lensing legacy survey - I. Survey overview and T0002 release sample , 2006, astro-ph/0610362.
[123] M. Oguri. The image separation distribution of strong lenses: halo versus subhalo populations , 2005, astro-ph/0508528.
[124] G. Bruzual,et al. Stellar population synthesis at the resolution of 2003 , 2003, astro-ph/0309134.
[125] R. Beaton,et al. Calibration of the Tip of the Red Giant Branch , 2003, The Astrophysical Journal.
[126] V. Narayanan,et al. Spectroscopic Target Selection for the Sloan Digital Sky Survey: The Luminous Red Galaxy Sample , 2001, astro-ph/0108153.
[127] D. Schlegel,et al. Maps of Dust Infrared Emission for Use in Estimation of Reddening and Cosmic Microwave Background Radiation Foregrounds , 1998 .
[128] E. Bertin,et al. SExtractor: Software for source extraction , 1996 .
[129] G. Abell,et al. A Catalog of Rich Clusters of Galaxies , 1989 .
[130] Geoffrey E. Hinton,et al. Learning representations by back-propagating errors , 1986, Nature.
[131] I. Shapiro,et al. On model-dependent bounds on H(0) from gravitational images Application of Q0957 + 561A,B , 1985 .
[132] J. Gott,et al. The Statistics of gravitational lenses: The Distributions of image angular separations and lens redshifts , 1984 .
[133] J. Whelan,et al. Binaries and Supernovae of Type I , 1973 .
[134] D. Calzetti,et al. The COSMOS Survey: Hubble Space Telescope / Advanced Camera for Surveys (HST/ACS) Observations and Data Processing ∗ , 2018 .
[135] A. Ealet,et al. The 0 . 1 < z < 1 . 65 evolution of the bright end of the [ O ] luminosity function ? , ? ? , 2015 .
[136] Nitish Srivastava,et al. Dropout: a simple way to prevent neural networks from overfitting , 2014, J. Mach. Learn. Res..
[137] T. Treu,et al. The Internal Structure and Formation of Early-Type Galaxies: The Gravitational Lens System MG 2016+112 at z = 1.004 , 2002, astro-ph/0202342.
[138] Sean G. Ryan,et al. The Advanced Maui Optical and Space Surveillance Technologies Conference , 2006 .
[139] Yoshua Bengio,et al. Gradient-based learning applied to document recognition , 1998, Proc. IEEE.