The role of employee empowerment in the implementation of continuous improvement: Evidence from a case study of a financial services provider

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to understand the role of increasing employees’ level of continuous improvement (CI) empowerment, i.e. employees’ knowledge and understanding of CI, the possibility of open communication and support from the work environment regarding CI, in the implementation of CI over time. Design/methodology/approach Based on the theory of structural empowerment, the authors test the research question using evidence from a case study in a European financial services provider. Data are gathered with questionnaires on a team level and cover a period of 2.5 years including 780 participants. Findings The findings show that after conducting a CI programme in the case, there is a significant increase in employees’ CI empowerment over time, which has a positive but time-lagged relationship with the level of CI implementation. Research limitations/implications Implications are that CI empowerment can be created sustainably and is an important factor in establishing CI in a company, but that it takes time until empowerment leads to changes in behaviour. However, it has to be considered that these implications are solely derived from empirical results from a single company. Practical implications Financial service providers should invest in establishing CI empowerment and consider a delay in realising measurable benefits in terms of the level of CI implementation. Originality/value This paper is the first empirical study to examine the relationship between employee CI empowerment and the implementation of CI from a longitudinal perspective.

[1]  C. Wilderom,et al.  Lean-team effectiveness through leader values and members’ informing , 2016 .

[2]  Bert Meijboom,et al.  The impact of lean on the problem solving behavior of nurses: A quasi-experimental study , 2016 .

[3]  B. Gammelgaard,et al.  Managing paradoxical tensions during the implementation of Lean capabilities for improvement , 2016 .

[4]  Michael Leyer,et al.  A framework for systemising services from an operations management perspective , 2016 .

[5]  Arnaldo Camuffo,et al.  Rolling out lean production systems: a knowledge-based perspective , 2016 .

[6]  H. Walker,et al.  Theoretical perspectives in operations management: an analysis of the literature , 2015 .

[7]  Wiljeana J. Glover,et al.  The relationship between continuous improvement and rapid improvement sustainability , 2015 .

[8]  Jagdeep Singh,et al.  Continuous improvement philosophy – literature review and directions , 2015 .

[9]  Nick Rich,et al.  The relationship between lean operations and sustainable operations , 2015 .

[10]  David D. Dobrzykowski,et al.  Strategic customer service orientation, lean manufacturing practices and performance outcomes , 2014 .

[11]  Michael Leyer,et al.  How lean are financial service companies really? Empirical evidence from a large scale study in Germany , 2014 .

[12]  Alejandro Orgambídez-Ramos,et al.  Empowering employees : structural empowerment as antecedent of job satisfaction in university settings , 2014 .

[13]  Zoe Radnor,et al.  Lean in UK Government: internal efficiency or customer service? , 2013 .

[14]  Reha Uzsoy,et al.  The impact of simultaneous continuous improvement in setup time and repair time on manufacturing cycle times under uncertain conditions , 2013 .

[15]  Halvor Holtskog,et al.  Continuous Improvement beyond the Lean understanding , 2013 .

[16]  Tima T. Moldogaziev,et al.  Using Employee Empowerment to Encourage Innovative Behavior in the Public Sector , 2013 .

[17]  L. Marquet.  Turn the Ship Around!: How to Create Leadership at Every Level , 2012 .

[18]  Marco Lam,et al.  Achieving Employee Commitment for Continuous Improvement Initiatives , 2012 .

[19]  Harwinder Singh,et al.  Continuous improvement approach: state‐of‐art review and future implications , 2012 .

[20]  José Moyano-Fuentes,et al.  International Journal of Operations & Production Management Emerald Article: Learning on lean: a review of thinking and research , 2012 .

[21]  Henk Folmer,et al.  Reply to Steele & Ferrer: Modeling Oscillation, Approximately or Exactly? , 2011, Multivariate behavioral research.

[22]  Daniel Olausson,et al.  Continuous improvement put into practice , 2011 .

[23]  Suresh K. Nair,et al.  Operations in Financial Services—An Overview , 2010 .

[24]  J. Kotter.  Leading change: why transformation efforts fail , 2009, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[25]  Eng Wah Lee,et al.  Business process management (BPM) standards: a survey , 2009, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[26]  Mike Rother,et al.  Toyota Kata: Managing People for Improvement, Adaptiveness and Superior Results , 2009 .

[27]  Judy Oliver,et al.  Continuous improvement: role of organisational learning mechanisms , 2009 .

[28]  Lawrence M. Corbett,et al.  The quest for business excellence: evidence from New Zealand's award winners , 2009 .

[29]  Monte Wynder,et al.  Employee Participation in Continuous Improvement Programs: The Interaction Effects of Accounting Information and Control , 2008 .

[30]  Ronald J. M. M. Does,et al.  Lean Six Sigma in financial services , 2008 .

[31]  Joel K. Jolayemi,et al.  Hoshin kanri and hoshin process: A review and literature survey , 2008 .

[32]  Toni L. Doolen,et al.  Using Scorecards for Supplier Performance Improvement: Case Application in a Lean Manufacturing Organization , 2006 .

[33]  A. Koutsomanoli-Filippaki,et al.  Competition and Concentration in the New European Banking Landscape , 2006 .

[34]  J. Liker,et al.  The Toyota Way in Services: The Case of Lean Product Development , 2006 .

[35]  Paul Walsh,et al.  An integrative framework for measuring the extent to which organizational variables influence the success of process improvement programs , 2005 .

[36]  Amy C. Edmondson,et al.  The Mixed Effects of Inconsistency on Experimentation in Organizations , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[37]  Cristina B. Gibson,et al.  A Healthy Divide: Subgroups as a Stimulus for Team Learning Behavior , 2003 .

[38]  Frances Jørgensen,et al.  The role of CI and learning in an organisational change process: experiences from a longitudinal study of organisational change , 2002 .

[39]  Peter Samuelsson,et al.  Self‐assessment practices in large organisations , 2002 .

[40]  Paul Lillrank,et al.  Continuous improvement: Exploring alternative organizational designs , 2001 .

[41]  Joseph J. Martocchio,et al.  Empowerment and continuous improvement in the United States, Mexico, Poland, and India: predicting fit on the basis of the dimensions of power distance and individualism. , 2000, The Journal of applied psychology.

[42]  William Wallace,et al.  Business excellence through customer satisfaction , 2000 .

[43]  Jan Kees Looise,et al.  Continuous improvement and the mini‐company concept , 1999 .

[44]  John Bessant,et al.  Developing strategic continuous improvement capability , 1999 .

[45]  Taina Savolainen,et al.  Cycles of continuous improvement , 1999 .

[46]  Jens J. Dahlgaard,et al.  Integrating business excellence and innovation management: Developing a culture for innovation, creativity and learning , 1999 .

[47]  Mike Kaye,et al.  Continuous improvement: the ten essential criteria , 1999 .

[48]  David Chan,et al.  The Conceptualization and Analysis of Change Over Time: An Integrative Approach Incorporating Longitudinal Mean and Covariance Structures Analysis (LMACS) and Multiple Indicator Latent Growth Modeling (MLGM) , 1998 .

[49]  Anders Berger,et al.  Continuous improvement and kaizen: standardization and organizational designs , 1997 .

[50]  J. Bessant,et al.  High-involvement innovation through continuous improvement , 1997 .

[51]  James P. Womack,et al.  Lean Thinking: Banish Waste and Create Wealth in Your Corporation , 1996 .

[52]  E. A. Locke,et al.  ORGANIZATIONAL LEARNING AND CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT , 1995 .

[53]  LordJohn,et al.  The Process of Empowerment: Implications for Theory and Practice , 1993 .

[54]  K. Thomas,et al.  Cognitive Elements of Empowerment: An “Interpretive” Model of Intrinsic Task Motivation , 1990 .

[55]  R. Yin.  Case Study Research: Design and Methods , 1984 .