Packaging as Brand Communication: Effects of Product Pictures on Consumer Responses to the Package and Brand

This paper examines the impact of product imagery (on packages) on consumers’ beliefs about the brand and their evaluations of both the brand and package. An empirical study using food products demonstrates that packages displaying a picture of the product can communicate information about the brand, and thus change brand beliefs. In addition, consumers who placed the most importance on these beliefs also had a better evaluation of the brand itself when its package included a product picture. This research thus provides evidence that consumers use packaging, an extrinsic cue, to infer intrinsic product attributes. In addition, consumers reported a more positive attitude toward the package itself when it included a product picture.

[1]  Linda L. Price,et al.  The Role of Imagery in Information Processing: Review and Extensions , 1987 .

[2]  Dick R. Wittink,et al.  Verbal versus realistic pictorial representations in conjoint analysis with design attributes , 1998 .

[3]  R. Pieters,et al.  Visual attention during brand choice : The impact of time pressure and task motivation , 1999 .

[4]  Scott B. MacKenzie,et al.  An Empirical Examination of the Structural Antecedents of Attitude toward the Ad in an Advertising Pretesting Context , 1989 .

[5]  Richard J. Semenik.  Promotion and Integrated Marketing Communications , 2001 .

[6]  P. Bone,et al.  Ethical Dilemmas in Packaging: Beliefs of Packaging Professionals , 1992 .

[7]  V. Zeithaml.  Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence: , 1988 .

[8]  P. C. Purwar.  The role of price cues in product quality perception : a comprehensive model and an empirical investigation , 1982 .

[9]  Jack M. Feldman,et al.  Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. , 1988 .

[10]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  The Influence of Observation Time on the Role of the Product Design in Consumer Preference , 1998 .

[11]  Raymond Edgar Schucker.  AN EVALUATION OF METHODS FOR MEASURING CONSUMER REACTIONS TO RETAIL PACKAGES , 1959 .

[12]  Brian Sternthal,et al.  Examining the Vividness Controversy: An Availability-Valence Interpretation , 1986 .

[13]  Jerry C. Olson,et al.  Cue Utilization in the Quality Perception Process , 1972 .

[14]  B. Wansink.  Can Package Size Accelerate Usage Volume? , 1995 .

[15]  H. Sexton.  Advertising , 1898, The American Journal of Dental Science.

[16]  Montague Ullman.  The Role of Imagery , 1975 .

[17]  Raymond R. Burke,et al.  Packaging communication: attentional effects of product imagery , 2001 .

[18]  Lawrence L. Garber,et al.  The role of package color in consumer purchase consideration and choise , 2000 .

[19]  Julie L. Ozanne,et al.  Is your package an effective communicator? A normative framework for increasing the communicative competence of packaging , 1998 .

[20]  P. Bone,et al.  Packaging Ethics: Perceptual Differences among Packaging Professionals, Brand Managers and Ethically-interested Consumers , 2000 .

[21]  Jan P.L. Schoormans,et al.  The effect of new package design on product attention, categorization and evaluation , 1997 .

[22]  Michael Jay Polonsky,et al.  Communicating Environmental Information: Are Marketing Claims on Packaging Misleading? , 1998 .

[23]  Kathy A. Lutz,et al.  Imagery-Eliciting Strategies: Review and Implications of Research , 1978 .

[24]  A. Paivio.  Mental Representations: A Dual Coding Approach , 1986 .