Maximum Likelihood Dynamic Factor Modeling for Arbitrary N and T Using SEM

This article has 3 objectives that build on each other. First, we demonstrate how to obtain maximum likelihood estimates for dynamic factor models (the direct autoregressive factor score model) with arbitrary T and N by means of structural equation modeling (SEM) and compare the approach to existing methods. Second, we go beyond standard time series analysis (T large and N = 1) and conventional SEM (N large and T = 1 or small) by integrating both approaches. The resulting combined model offers a variety of new modeling options including a direct test of the ergodicity hypothesis, according to which the factorial structure of an individual observed at many time points is identical to the factorial structure of a group of individuals observed at a single point in time. Third, we illustrate the flexibility of SEM time series modeling by extending the approach to account for complex error structures. We end with a discussion of current limitations and future applications of SEM-based time series modeling for arbitrary T and N.

[1]  K. Jöreskog A General Method for Estimating a Linear Structural Equation System. , 1970 .

[2]  A. Goldberger,et al.  Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. , 1974 .

[3]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .

[4]  P.C.M. Molenaar,et al.  Applying dynamic factor analysis in behavioral and social science research , 2004 .

[5]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  On the Nature of SEM Estimates of ARMA Parameters , 2002 .

[6]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  ARMA-Based SEM When the Number of Time Points T Exceeds the Number of Cases N: Raw Data Maximum Likelihood , 2003 .

[7]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A hierarchy of univariate and multivariate structural time series models , 1996 .

[8]  S. Wright,et al.  The Relative Importance of Heredity and Environment in Determining the Piebald Pattern of Guinea-Pigs. , 1920, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[9]  Hermann Singer,et al.  Continuous time modeling of panel data: SEM versus filter techniques , 2008 .

[10]  Siem Jan Koopman,et al.  Time Series Analysis by State Space Methods , 2001 .

[11]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Aging Neuroscience Hundred Days of Cognitive Training Enhance Broad Cognitive Abilities in Adulthood: Findings from the Cogito Study Materials and Methods Participants and Procedure , 2022 .

[12]  P. Gill,et al.  User's Guide for SOL/NPSOL: A Fortran Package for Nonlinear Programming. , 1983 .

[13]  J R Nesselroade,et al.  Multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and P-technique factor analysis: a review of intraindividual change studies. , 1990, Experimental aging research.

[14]  R. Engle,et al.  A One-Factor Multivariate Time Series Model of Metropolitan Wage Rates , 1981 .

[15]  R. Hoyle,et al.  Pooling Lagged Covariance Structures Based on Short, Multivariate Time Series for Dynamic Factor Analysis , 1999 .

[16]  John R. Nesselroade,et al.  Multivariate Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Sequences for Analyzing Ontogenetic and Generational Change: , 1970 .

[17]  P. Molenaar,et al.  The Recoverability of P-technique Factor Analysis , 2009, Multivariate behavioral research.

[18]  John Geweke,et al.  Maximum Likelihood "Confirmatory" Factor Analysis of Economic Time Series , 1981 .

[19]  Ellen L. Hamaker,et al.  Comparisons of Four Methods for Estimating a Dynamic Factor Model , 2008 .

[20]  Stef van Buuren,et al.  Fitting arma time series by structural equation models , 1997 .

[21]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Some algebraic properties of the Reticular Action Model for moment structures. , 1984, The British journal of mathematical and statistical psychology.

[22]  B. Muthén BEYOND SEM: GENERAL LATENT VARIABLE MODELING , 2002 .

[23]  Sy-Miin Chow,et al.  Equivalence and Differences Between Structural Equation Modeling and State-Space Modeling Techniques , 2010 .

[24]  J. Nesselroade,et al.  Multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and p-technique factor analysis: A review of intraindividual change studies , 2007 .

[25]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  The New Person-Specific Paradigm in Psychology , 2009 .

[26]  R. Cattell,et al.  P-technique demonstrated in determining psychophysiological source traits in a normal individual , 1947, Psychometrika.

[27]  T. W. Anderson,et al.  The use of factor analysis in the statistical analysis of multiple time series , 1963 .

[28]  P. Molenaar A Manifesto on Psychology as Idiographic Science: Bringing the Person Back Into Scientific Psychology, This Time Forever , 2004 .

[29]  U. Lindenberger,et al.  Adult Age Differences in Covariation of Motivation and Working Memory Performance: Contrasting Between-Person and Within-Person Findings , 2010 .

[30]  Hermann Singer SEM Modeling with Singular Moment Matrices Part I: ML-Estimation of Time Series , 2010 .

[31]  K. Lange,et al.  Extensions to pedigree analysis III. Variance components by the scoring method , 1976, Annals of human genetics.

[32]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series , 1985 .

[33]  R Core Team,et al.  R: A language and environment for statistical computing. , 2014 .

[34]  Peter C. M. Molenaar,et al.  A Comparison of Pseudo-Maximum Likelihood and Asymptotically Distribution-Free Dynamic Factor Analysis Parameter Estimation in Fitting Covariance-Structure Models to Block-Toeplitz Matrices Representing Single-Subject Multivariate Time-Series. , 1998, Multivariate behavioral research.

[35]  J. Oud,et al.  Continuous time state space modeling of panel data by means of sem , 2000 .

[36]  Armin Schneider,et al.  Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience Aging Neuroscience Review Article the Kibra Gene and Protein , 2022 .

[37]  Hermann Singer,et al.  Continuous time modeling of panel data - Introduction , 2008 .

[38]  Johan H. L. Oud,et al.  SEM state space modeling of panel data in discrete and continuous time and its relationship to traditional state space modeling , 2004 .