Social network dominance based on analysis of asymmetry

We focus on analysis of dominance, power, influence - that by definition asymmetric - between pairs of individuals in social networks. We conduct dominance analysis based on the canonical analysis of asymmetry that decomposes a square asymmetric matrix into two parts, a symmetric one and a skew-symmetric one, and then applies the singular value decomposition (SVD) on the skew-symmetric part. Each individual node can be projected as one 2-dimensional point based on its row values at each pair of successive singular vectors. The asymmetric relationship between two individuals can then be captured by areas of triangles formed from the two points and the origin in each 2-dimensional space. We quantify node dominance (submissive) score based on the relative position of the node's coordinate from coordinates of all other nodes it dominates (subdues) in the projected singular vector spaces. We conduct dominance/submissiveness analysis for several representative networks including perfect linear orderings, networks with tree structure, and networks with random graphs and examine the departures of a real social network from those representative graphs. Empirical evaluations demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

[1]  Marina Meila,et al.  Clustering by weighted cuts in directed graphs , 2007, SDM.

[2]  Rajeev Motwani,et al.  The PageRank Citation Ranking : Bringing Order to the Web , 1999, WWW 1999.

[3]  Youngdo Kim,et al.  Finding communities in directed networks. , 2009, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[4]  Xiaowei Ying,et al.  On Randomness Measures for Social Networks , 2009, SDM.

[5]  Linton C. Freeman,et al.  Uncovering Organizational Hierarchies , 1997, Comput. Math. Organ. Theory.

[6]  E A Leicht,et al.  Community structure in directed networks. , 2007, Physical review letters.

[7]  Mark E. J. Newman,et al.  The Structure and Function of Complex Networks , 2003, SIAM Rev..

[8]  S. Strogatz Exploring complex networks , 2001, Nature.

[9]  Srinivasan Parthasarathy,et al.  Symmetrizations for clustering directed graphs , 2011, EDBT/ICDT '11.

[10]  Xintao Wu,et al.  Analysis of Spectral Space Properties of Directed Graphs Using Matrix Perturbation Theory with Application in Graph Partition , 2015, 2015 IEEE International Conference on Data Mining.

[11]  L. da F. Costa,et al.  Characterization of complex networks: A survey of measurements , 2005, cond-mat/0505185.

[12]  Jon M. Kleinberg,et al.  The Web as a Graph: Measurements, Models, and Methods , 1999, COCOON.

[13]  Bernhard Schölkopf,et al.  Learning from labeled and unlabeled data on a directed graph , 2005, ICML.

[14]  Masashi Furukawa,et al.  Eigenvectors for clustering: Unipartite, bipartite, and directed graph cases , 2010, 2010 International Conference on Electronics and Information Engineering.

[15]  F. Chung Laplacians and the Cheeger Inequality for Directed Graphs , 2005 .