Detectability of Tones in Quiet and in Noise by Rats and Monkeys

Sensory systems in humans have been investigated by means of psychophysical methods. These methods define the rules for systematic presentation of stimuli to the subject and for the analysis of the subject’s responses from which various characteristics of the particular sensory system can be abstracted. Human psychophysical experiments rely heavily on language for instruction of the subject in his task and for his cooperation throughout the study. A crucial difference between human and animal psychophysics is the absence of language in animals. Thus, a systematic investigation of sensory characteristics in animals requires application of techniques which evolved not only from psychophysics, but also from another branch of psychology, namely, conditioning. In order to instruct animals in their task in a psychophysical experiment and maintain their behavior during these experiments, conditioning techniques have been required. Both classical and instrumental conditioning techniques have supplied appropriate precedures, although instrumental conditioning has been the more prevalent source of these techniques.

[1]  P. O. Thompson,et al.  The Frequency Selectivity of the Ear as Determined by Masking Experiments , 1950 .

[2]  E. Zwicker,et al.  Das Ohr als Nachrichtenempfänger , 1967 .

[3]  G. Gourevitch Auditory Masking in the Rat , 1964 .

[4]  D. D. Greenwood,et al.  Auditory Masking and the Critical Band , 1961 .

[5]  S Barrow,et al.  A training technique for the daily chairing of monkeys. , 1966, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[6]  D. D. Greenwood Critical Bandwidth and the Frequency Coordinates of the Basilar Membrane , 1961 .

[7]  W. A. Semenoff,et al.  COMPARISON OF THE AUDITORY ACUITY OF MAN AND MONKEY. , 1964, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[8]  THRESHOLDS OF AUDITION FOR THREE SPECIES OF MONKEYS. , 1964, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  J MEAD,et al.  Mechanical properties of lungs. , 1961, Physiological reviews.

[10]  P. Ash The sensory capacities of infrahuman mammals: vision, audition, gustation. , 1951, Psychological bulletin.

[11]  C. Berlin HEARING IN MICE VIA GSR AUDIOMETRY. , 1963, Journal of speech and hearing research.

[12]  G. Gourevitch,et al.  Auditory Thresholds in the Rat Measured by an Operant Technique , 1960, Science.

[13]  H. Schlosberg,et al.  Octave generalization, pitch discrimination, and loudness thresholds in the white rat. , 1943 .

[14]  G. Gourevitch,et al.  Audibility in the rat. , 1966, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[15]  J. H. Elder Auditory acuity of the chimpanzee. , 1934 .

[16]  E. de Boer,et al.  Masking and Discrimination , 1966 .

[17]  W. S. Hunter Further Data on the Auditory Sensitivity of the White Rat , 1927 .

[18]  Charles S. Watson,et al.  Masking of Tones by Noise for the Cat , 1959 .

[19]  C. S. Johnson Masked tonal thresholds in the bottlenosed porpoise. , 1968, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[20]  C. Morgan,et al.  Auditory sensitivity in the rat. , 1942 .

[21]  N. Munn Handbook of psychological research on the rat : a introduction to animal psychology / Norman L Munn , 1950 .

[22]  D M GREEN,et al.  MASKING WITH TWO TONES. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[23]  L. A. Pennington,et al.  An Improved Conditioning Technique for Determining Auditory Acuity of the Rat , 1943 .

[24]  Georg v. Békésy,et al.  A New Audiometer , 1947 .

[25]  J. H. Jamison Measurement of auditory intensity thresholds in the rat by conditioning of an autonomic response. , 1951, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[26]  Audition in the white rat. III. Absolute and relative intensity thresholds. , 1938 .

[27]  J. Harris The auditory acuity of preadolescent monkeys. , 1943 .

[28]  P. M. Hamilton Noise Masked Thresholds as a Function of Tonal Duration and Masking Noise Band Width , 1955 .

[29]  James D. Miller Auditory Sensitivity of the Chinchilla in Quiet and in Noise , 1964 .

[30]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Handbook of experimental psychology , 1951 .

[31]  W. Stebbins,et al.  Auditory Sensitivity of the Monkey , 1966, Science.

[32]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  The Masking of Pure Tones and of Speech by White Noise , 1950 .

[33]  F GOUREVITCH,et al.  A manipulandum for use with rats responding to auditory stimuli. , 1963, Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior.

[34]  R. Plomp,et al.  Tonal consonance and critical bandwidth. , 1965, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[35]  H. Fletcher Relation Between Loudness and Masking , 1937 .

[36]  S. S. Stevens,et al.  Critical Band Width in Loudness Summation , 1957 .

[37]  M. Loeb,et al.  AUDITORY SENSITIVITY OF THE RHEUSUS MONKEY. , 1965, Journal of comparative and physiological psychology.

[38]  Charles H. Southwick,et al.  Behavior of Nonhuman Primates , 1966, The Yale Journal of Biology and Medicine.