The long-term dynamics of co-authorship scientific networks: Iberoamerican countries (1973–2010)

We analyse the national production of academic knowledge in all Iberoamerican and Caribbean countries between 1973 and 2010. We show that the total number of citable scientific publications listed in the Science Citation Index (SCI), the Social Science Citation Index (SSCI) and Arts and Humanities Citation Index (A&HCI) follow an exponential growth, the same as their national productivity (number of publications per capita). During the last 38 years, Portugal shows the highest growth rate in both indicators. We explore the temporal evolution of the co-authorship patterns within a sample of 12 Iberoamerican countries (responsible for 98% of the total regional publications between 1973 and 2010) with a group of 46 other different nations. We show that the scientific co-authorship among countries follows a power-law and behaves as a self-organizing scale-free network, where each country appears as a node and each co-publication as a link. We develop a mathematical model to study the temporal evolution of co-authorship networks, based on a preferential attachment strategy and we show that the number of co-publications among countries grows quadraticly against time. We empirically determine the quadratic growth constants for 352 different co-authorship networks within the period 1973–2006. We corroborate that the connectivity of Iberoamerican countries with larger scientific networks (hubs) is growing faster than that of other less connected countries. We determine the dates, t0, at which the co-authorship connectivities trigger the self-organizing scale-free network for each of the 352 cases. We find that the latter follows a normal distribution around year 1981.4±2.2 and we connect this effect with a brain-drain process generated during the previous decade. We show how the number of co-publications Pki(t) between country k and country i, against the coupling growth-coefficients aki, follows a power-law mathematical relation. We develop a methodology to use the empirically determined growth constants for each co-authorship network to predict changes in the relative intensity of cooperation among countries and we test its predictions for the period 2007–2010. We finally discuss the implications of our findings on the science and technology policies.

[1]  Francis Narin,et al.  The Distribution of World Science , 1977 .

[2]  G. Melin Pragmatism and self-organization: Research collaboration on the individual level , 2000 .

[3]  J. S. Katz,et al.  What is research collaboration , 1997 .

[4]  V. Latora,et al.  Complex networks: Structure and dynamics , 2006 .

[5]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science , 1968, Science.

[6]  Jane M. Russell,et al.  The increasing role of international cooperation in science and technology research in Mexico , 1995, Scientometrics.

[7]  Albert,et al.  Emergence of scaling in random networks , 1999, Science.

[8]  Tibor Braun,et al.  International collaboration in the sciences 1981–1985 , 1990, Scientometrics.

[9]  Michael Mabe,et al.  The growth and number of journals , 2003 .

[10]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 1978, Scientometrics.

[11]  W. Glänzel,et al.  Analysing Scientific Networks Through Co-Authorship , 2004 .

[12]  V. Cano,et al.  Characteristics of the publishing infrastructure of peripheral countries: A comparison of periodical publications from Latin America with periodicals from the US and the UK , 1995, Scientometrics.

[13]  Jean-Baptiste Meyer,et al.  Network Approach versus Brain Drain: Lessons from the Diaspora , 2001 .

[14]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Reflections on Scientific Collaboration (and its study): Past, Present, and Future , 2001, Scientometrics.

[15]  L. Holm-Nielsen,et al.  International Mobility of Researchers and Scientists: Policy Options for Turning a Drain into a Gain , 2006 .

[16]  M. Markus,et al.  Fluctuation theorem for a deterministic one-particle system. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[17]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations , 2001, cond-mat/0104162.

[18]  Grit Laudel,et al.  Collaboration, creativity and rewards: why and how scientists collaborate , 2001, Int. J. Technol. Manag..

[19]  J. Gaillard Scientists in the Third World , 1992 .

[20]  M. Tomassini,et al.  Empirical analysis of the evolution of a scientific collaboration network , 2007 .

[21]  R. Merton The Matthew Effect in Science, II: Cumulative Advantage and the Symbolism of Intellectual Property , 1988, Isis.

[22]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Does collaborative research have greater epistemic authority? , 2004, Scientometrics.

[23]  Loet Leydesdorff,et al.  Network Structure, Self-Organization and the Growth of International Collaboration in Science.Research Policy, 34(10), 2005, 1608-1618. , 2005, 0911.4299.

[24]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Evolution of networks , 2001, cond-mat/0106144.

[25]  Victor Herrero Solana,et al.  Science in america latina: A comparison of bibliometric and scientific-technical indicators , 1999, Scientometrics.

[26]  Tao Zhou,et al.  Evolving model of weighted networks inspired by scientific collaboration networks , 2005 .

[27]  Xiao Fan Wang,et al.  Complex Networks: Topology, Dynamics and Synchronization , 2002, Int. J. Bifurc. Chaos.

[28]  Donald de B. Beaver,et al.  Studies in scientific collaboration , 2005, Scientometrics.

[29]  W. Wayt Gibbs,et al.  Lost Science in the Third World , 1995 .

[30]  Isabel Gómez,et al.  Analysis of the structure of international scientific cooperation networks through bibliometric indicators , 1999, Scientometrics.

[31]  Isabel Mateo Gómez,et al.  LA COOPERACIÓN CIENTÍFICA DE LOS PAÍSES DE AMÉRICA LATINA A TRAVÉS DE INDICADORES BIBLIOMÉTRICOS , 1998 .

[32]  Caroline S. Wagner,et al.  Mapping the network of global science: comparing international co-authorships from 1990 to 2000 , 2005 .

[33]  J. S. Katz,et al.  The self-similar science system , 1999 .

[34]  E. Oteiza Emigración de profesionales, técnicos y obreros calificados argentinos a los Estados Unidos: Análisis de las fluctuaciones de la emigración bruta julio 1950 a junio 1970 , 1970 .

[35]  M. Holmgren,et al.  Science on the Rise in Developing Countries , 2004, PLoS biology.

[36]  M. Newman,et al.  The structure of scientific collaboration networks. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[37]  G. Lemarchand Science, Technology and Innovation Policies in Latin America and the Caribbean During the Past Six Decades , 2010 .

[38]  Nora Narváez-Berthelemot An index to measure the international collaboration of developing countries based on the participation of national institutions: The case of Latin America , 2005, Scientometrics.

[39]  Albert-László Barabási,et al.  Statistical mechanics of complex networks , 2001, ArXiv.

[40]  D. Price,et al.  Little Science, Big Science and Beyond , 1986 .

[41]  J. Gaillard,et al.  Turning Brain Drain into Brain Gain: The Colombian Experience of the Diaspora Option , 1997 .

[42]  S. N. Dorogovtsev,et al.  Self-organization of collaboration networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[43]  C. Mallmann,et al.  Generational Explanation of Long-Term “Billow-Like” Dynamics of Societal Processes , 1998 .