Brain potentials reflect residual face processing in a case of prosopagnosia

Here, ERPs were employed to characterise the residual face processing of FE, a patient with extensive damage to the ventral temporal‐occipital cortex and a dense prosopagnosia. Alarge N170 was present in FE and he performed well in tests of face structural processing. Covert recognition of the faces of personal acquaintances was demonstrated with P300 oddball experiments. The onset latency of the P300 effect was normal, indicating fast availability of covert memory. The scalp topography of this component in FE was different from that of the P3b, presenting a centro‐frontal maximum. FE also presented larger skin conductance responses to familiar than to unfamiliar faces. The amplitudes of both the single‐trial P300s and the SCRs triggered by familiar faces were positively correlated with the degree of person‐familiarity that FE had for the poser. He performed at chance when asked to select between the face of a familiar person and that of an unfamiliar person on the basis of explicit recognition, whereas he selected more the previously known face if the forced choice was based on trustworthiness or a vague sense of familiarity. The results suggest that in FE, early face processing was relatively intact and covert recognition was fast. Neural structures involved in the processing of emotional or social cues possibly mediate the covert recognition present in FE.

[1]  Maria A. Bobes,et al.  Covert Matching of Unfamiliar Faces in a Case of Prosopagnosia: an ERP Study , 2003, Cortex.

[2]  Stefan R. Schweinberger,et al.  Covert Recognition and the Neural System for Face Processing , 2003, Cortex.

[3]  T. Valentine,et al.  Perspectives on Prosopagnosia and Models of Face Recognition , 2003, Cortex.

[4]  A. Burton,et al.  Event-related brain potential evidence for a response of inferior temporal cortex to familiar face repetitions. , 2002, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[5]  Nouchine Hadjikhani,et al.  Neural basis of prosopagnosia: An fMRI study , 2002, Human brain mapping.

[6]  Janice Kay,et al.  An evaluation of statistical procedures for comparing an individual's performance with that of a group of controls , 2002, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[7]  Mariya V. Cherkasova,et al.  Covert recognition in acquired and developmental prosopagnosia , 2001, Neurology.

[8]  Chris Rorden,et al.  Spatial Normalization of Brain Images with Focal Lesions Using Cost Function Masking , 2001, NeuroImage.

[9]  C. Genovese,et al.  A functional MRI study of face recognition in patients with prosopagnosia , 2001, Neuroreport.

[10]  Max Coltheart,et al.  A two-way window on face recognition , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  T. Valentine,et al.  Face recognition and emotional valence: processing without awareness by neurologically intact participants does not simulate covert recognition in prosopagnosia , 2001, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[12]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  A two-way window on face recognition Reply to Breen et al , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Pavel Jurák,et al.  Intracerebral event-related potentials to subthreshold target stimuli , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[14]  Michael B. Lewis,et al.  Capgras delusion: a window on face recognition , 2001, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[15]  Michael Snodgrass,et al.  Subliminal visual oddball stimuli evoke a P300 component , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[16]  M. Eimer Effects of face inversion on the structural encoding and recognition of faces. Evidence from event-related brain potentials. , 2000, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[17]  Erich Schröger,et al.  Auditory distraction: event-related potential and behavioral indices , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[18]  J. Haxby,et al.  The distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[19]  Shlomo Bentin,et al.  Unilateral Neglect after Right-Hemisphere Damage: Contributions from Event-Related Potentials , 2000, Audiology and Neurotology.

[20]  H. Critchley,et al.  Neural Activity Relating to Generation and Representation of Galvanic Skin Conductance Responses: A Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Study , 2000, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[21]  M. Eimer Event-related brain potentials distinguish processing stages involved in face perception and recognition , 2000, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[22]  L. Deouell,et al.  STRUCTURAL ENCODING AND IDENTIFICATION IN FACE PROCESSING: ERP EVIDENCE FOR SEPARATE MECHANISMS , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  M Coltheart,et al.  MODELS OF FACE RECOGNITION AND DELUSIONAL MISIDENTIFICATION: A CRITICAL REVIEW , 2000, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[24]  J. Grafman,et al.  Frontal lobe lesions and electrodermal activity: effects of significance , 1999, Neuropsychologia.

[25]  P. Jurák,et al.  The role of frontal and temporal lobes in visual discrimination task — depth ERP studies , 1999, Neurophysiologie Clinique/Clinical Neurophysiology.

[26]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. II: Response properties of face-specific potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[27]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. I: Potentials generated in occipitotemporal cortex by face and non-face stimuli. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[28]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological studies of human face perception. III: Effects of top-down processing on face-specific potentials. , 1999, Cerebral cortex.

[29]  E. Donchin,et al.  A componential analysis of the ERP elicited by novel events using a dense electrode array. , 1999, Psychophysiology.

[30]  L. Deouell,et al.  Cognitive Neuroscience: Selective visual streaming in face recognition: evidence from developmental prosopagnosia , 1999 .

[31]  B. Rossion,et al.  Task modulation of brain activity related to familiar and unfamiliar face processing: an ERP study , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[32]  R A McCarthy,et al.  Prosopagnosia and structural encoding of faces: evidence from event-related potentials. , 1999, Neuroreport.

[33]  R. O’Reilly SIMULATION AND EXPLANATION IN NEUROPSYCHOLOGY AND BEYOND , 1999 .

[34]  J. Polich,et al.  P3a and P3b from typical auditory and visual stimuli , 1999, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[35]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The Effect of Face Inversion on Activity in Human Neural Systems for Face and Object Perception , 1999, Neuron.

[36]  R. Knight,et al.  Neural Mechanisms of Involuntary Attention to Acoustic Novelty and Change , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[37]  T. Allison,et al.  Temporal Cortex Activation in Humans Viewing Eye and Mouth Movements , 1998, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[38]  T. Demiralp,et al.  The effects of subthreshold visual stimulation on P300 response , 1997, Neuroreport.

[39]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Fusiform Face Area: A Module in Human Extrastriate Cortex Specialized for Face Perception , 1997, The Journal of Neuroscience.

[40]  T. Allison,et al.  Electrophysiological Studies of Face Perception in Humans , 1996, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[41]  Y. Sugiyama,et al.  Skin sympathetic nerve activity and event-related potentials during auditory oddball paradigms. , 1996, Journal of the autonomic nervous system.

[42]  M. Rugg,et al.  Electrophysiology of Mind. , 1996 .

[43]  Hanna Damasio,et al.  Double Dissociation between Overt and Covert Face Recognition , 1995, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[44]  E. Halgren,et al.  Intracerebral potentials to rare target and distractor auditory and visual stimuli. III. Frontal cortex. , 1995, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[45]  Leslie G. Ungerleider,et al.  The functional organization of human extrastriate cortex: a PET-rCBF study of selective attention to faces and locations , 1994, The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience.

[46]  M A Bobes,et al.  Brain potentials and the availability of semantic and phonological codes over time , 1994, Neuroreport.

[47]  E. Olivares,et al.  An ERP Study of Expectancy Violation in Face Perception , 1994, Brain and Cognition.

[48]  Tim Valentine,et al.  Evidence of Covert Recognition in a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1994, Cortex.

[49]  Randall C. O'Reilly,et al.  Dissociated overt and covert recognition as an emergent property of a lesioned neural network. , 1993, Psychological review.

[50]  R. Blair,et al.  An alternative method for significance testing of waveform difference potentials. , 1993, Psychophysiology.

[51]  T W Picton,et al.  The P300 Wave of the Human Event‐Related Potential , 1992, Journal of clinical neurophysiology : official publication of the American Electroencephalographic Society.

[52]  E. Haan,et al.  Behavioural and Physiological Evidence for Covert Face Recognition in a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1992, Cortex.

[53]  J. Sergent,et al.  Functional neuroanatomy of face and object processing. A positron emission tomography study. , 1992, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[54]  A. Young,et al.  Face recognition impairments. , 1992, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[55]  E. Renzi,et al.  Apperceptive and Associative Forms of Prosopagnosia , 1991, Cortex.

[56]  E K Warrington,et al.  Prosopagnosia: A Reclassification , 1991, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[57]  A. Young,et al.  Understanding covert recognition , 1991, Cognition.

[58]  Raymond Bruyer,et al.  Covert face recognition in prosopagnosia: A review , 1991, Brain and Cognition.

[59]  R. Bauer,et al.  Implicit learning of new faces in prosopagnosia: An application of the mere-exposure paradigm , 1990, Neuropsychologia.

[60]  C. Nicholson,et al.  Distortion of magnetic evoked fields and surface potentials by conductivity differences at boundaries in brain tissue. , 1990, Biophysical journal.

[61]  D. Ruchkin,et al.  Multiple sources of P3b associated with different types of information. , 1990, Psychophysiology.

[62]  Bruno Debruille,et al.  Brain potentials reveal covert facial recognition in prosopagnosia , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[63]  A. Young,et al.  Prosopagnosia and object agnosia without covert recognition , 1989, Neuropsychologia.

[64]  A. Damasio,et al.  Non-conscious face recognition in patients with face agnosia , 1988, Behavioural Brain Research.

[65]  E. Donchin,et al.  Is the P300 component a manifestation of context updating? , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[66]  R. Verleger Event-related potentials and cognition: A critique of the context updating hypothesis and an alternative interpretation of P3 , 1988, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[67]  A. Young,et al.  Cross-Domain Semantic Priming in Normal Subjects and a Prosopagnosic Patient , 1988, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[68]  A. Young,et al.  Face recognition without awareness , 1987 .

[69]  A. Damasio,et al.  The role of scanpaths in facial recognition and learning , 1987, Annals of neurology.

[70]  A. Damasio,et al.  Knowledge without awareness: an autonomic index of facial recognition by prosopagnosics. , 1985, Science.

[71]  C. C. Wood,et al.  Scalp distributions of event-related potentials: an ambiguity associated with analysis of variance models. , 1985, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[72]  R. Bauer,et al.  Autonomic recognition of names and faces in prosopagnosia: A neuropsychological application of the guilty knowledge test , 1984, Neuropsychologia.

[73]  P. Feyereisen,et al.  A case of prosopagnosia with some preserved covert remembrance of familiar faces , 1983, Brain and Cognition.

[74]  G. McCarthy,et al.  Augmenting mental chronometry: the P300 as a measure of stimulus evaluation time. , 1977, Science.

[75]  E. Courchesne,et al.  Stimulus novelty, task relevance and the visual evoked potential in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[76]  N. Squires,et al.  Two varieties of long-latency positive waves evoked by unpredictable auditory stimuli in man. , 1975, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology.

[77]  Steven A. Hillyard,et al.  Vertex potentials evoked during auditory signal detection: Relation to decision criteria , 1973 .

[78]  A. Benton,et al.  Impairment in facial recognition in patients with cerebral disease. , 1968, Transactions of the American Neurological Association.

[79]  F. Plum Handbook of Physiology. , 1960 .

[80]  C. Rorden,et al.  Stereotaxic display of brain lesions. , 2000, Behavioural neurology.

[81]  J. Haxby,et al.  Distinct representations of eye gaze and identity in the distributed human neural system for face perception , 2000, Nature Neuroscience.

[82]  A. Damasio,et al.  Decision making and the somatic marker hypothesis , 2000 .

[83]  E. Halgren,et al.  Location of human face‐selective cortex with respect to retinotopic areas , 1999, Human brain mapping.

[84]  Morris Moscovitch,et al.  Unconscious visual processing in neuropsychological syndromes: A survey of the literature and evaluation of models of consciousness , 1997 .

[85]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  The ERP and cognitive psychology: Conceptual issues. , 1995 .

[86]  Marcia Grabowecky,et al.  Escape from linear time: Prefrontal cortex and conscious experience , 1995 .

[87]  Joseph E. LeDoux,et al.  In search of an emotional system in the brain: Leaping from fear to emotion and consciousness. , 1995 .

[88]  A. Ardila,et al.  Prosopamnesia and Visuolimbic Disconnection Syndrome: A Case Study , 1992 .

[89]  Risto N t nen Attention and brain function , 1992 .

[90]  R. Bruyer,et al.  A clinical test battery of face processing. , 1991, The International journal of neuroscience.

[91]  K. Cave,et al.  Can We Lose Memories of Faces? Content Specificity and Awareness in a Prosopagnosic , 1991, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[92]  H. Harlow Higher functions of the nervous system. , 1953, Annual review of physiology.