Injectable Bone Cement Reinforced with Gold Nanodots Decorated rGO-Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposites, Augment Bone Regeneration.

Interest in the development of new generation injectable bone cements having appropriate mechanical properties, biodegradability, and bioactivity has been rekindled with the advent of nanoscience. Injectable bone cements made with calcium sulfate (CS) are of significant interest, owing to its compatibility and optimal self-setting property. Its rapid resorption rate, lack of bioactivity, and poor mechanical strength serve as a deterrent for its wide application. Herein, a significantly improved CS-based injectable bone cement (modified calcium sulfate termed as CSmod ), reinforced with various concentrations (0-15%) of a conductive nanocomposite containing gold nanodots and nanohydroxyapatite decorated reduced graphene oxide (rGO) sheets (AuHp@rGO), and functionalized with vancomycin, is presented. The piezo-responsive cement exhibits favorable injectability and setting times, along with improved mechanical properties. The antimicrobial, osteoinductive, and osteoconductive properties of the CSmod cement are confirmed using appropriate in vitro studies. There is an upregulation of the paracrine signaling mediated crosstalk between mesenchymal stem cells and human umbilical vein endothelial cells seeded on these cements. The ability of CSmod to induce endothelial cell recruitment and augment bone regeneration is evidenced in relevant rat models. The results imply that the multipronged activity exhibited by the novel-CSmod cement would be beneficial for bone repair.

[1]  A. Boccaccini,et al.  Injectable bone cements: What benefits the combination of calcium phosphates and bioactive glasses could bring? , 2022, Bioactive materials.

[2]  Xin Zhao,et al.  Electrosprayed Regeneration-Enhancer-Element Microspheres Power Osteogenesis and Angiogenesis Coupling. , 2022, Small.

[3]  N. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Gelatin Nanofibers Loaded with Zinc-Doped Hydroxyapatite for Osteogenic Differentiation of Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2022, ACS Applied Nano Materials.

[4]  H. Hua,et al.  A comparison of the vancomycin calcium sulfate implantation versus fenestration decompression for the treatment of sclerosing osteomyelitis , 2021, BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders.

[5]  Kui Xu,et al.  An improved osseointegration of metal implants by pitavastatin loaded multilayer films with osteogenic and angiogenic properties. , 2021, Biomaterials.

[6]  Jingdi Chen,et al.  Design and Characterization of Injectable Abalone Shell/Calcium Sulfate Bone Cement Scaffold for Bone Defect Repair , 2021 .

[7]  L. Grover,et al.  Formulation of a reactive oxygen producing calcium sulphate cement as an anti-bacterial hard tissue scaffold , 2021, Scientific Reports.

[8]  Sang‐Jae Kim,et al.  Remotely controlled self-powering electrical stimulators for osteogenic differentiation using bone inspired bioactive piezoelectric whitlockite nanoparticles , 2021, Nano Energy.

[9]  Swati Kaushik,et al.  A bioinspired, ice-templated multifunctional 3D cryogel composite crosslinked through in situ reduction of GO displayed improved mechanical, osteogenic and antimicrobial properties. , 2021, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[10]  N. Chattopadhyay,et al.  Synthesis and Evaluation of a Zinc Eluting rGO/Hydroxyapatite Nanocomposite Optimized for Bone Augmentation. , 2020, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[11]  Nicholas G Schott,et al.  Coupling Osteogenesis and Vasculogenesis in Engineered Orthopaedic Tissues. , 2020, Tissue engineering. Part B, Reviews.

[12]  Gerry L. Koons,et al.  Materials design for bone-tissue engineering , 2020, Nature Reviews Materials.

[13]  A. Zamanian,et al.  Synthesis and characterization of electrospun bioactive glass nanofibers-reinforced calcium sulfate bone cement and its cell biological response , 2020, Ceramics International.

[14]  L. Tayebi,et al.  Incorporation of functionalized reduced graphene oxide/magnesium nanohybrid to enhance the osteoinductivity capability of 3D printed calcium phosphate-based scaffolds , 2020, Composites Part B: Engineering.

[15]  Q. Shubhra,et al.  Piezoelectric Nano‐Biomaterials for Biomedicine and Tissue Regeneration , 2020, Advanced Functional Materials.

[16]  Changren Zhou,et al.  Formulation of α-Tricalcium Phosphate Bone Cement Based on an Alginate–Chitosan Gel System , 2020 .

[17]  G. Kurtzman,et al.  Bone Regeneration: Properties and Clinical Applications of Biphasic Calcium Sulfate. , 2020, Dental clinics of North America.

[18]  M. Domingos,et al.  Synthesis and Characterization of Sintered Sr/Fe-Modified Hydroxyapatite Bioceramics for Bone Tissue Engineering Applications. , 2020, ACS biomaterials science & engineering.

[19]  W. Katagiri,et al.  Exosomes from conditioned media of bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells promote bone regeneration by enhancing angiogenesis , 2019, PloS one.

[20]  Q. Lu,et al.  Calcium sulfate bone cements with nanoscaled silk fibroin as inducer. , 2019, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[21]  Apurba Das,et al.  A comprehensive review on electrical properties of hydroxyapatite based ceramic composites. , 2019, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[22]  K. Kubatzky,et al.  Chronic Implant-Related Bone Infections—Can Immune Modulation be a Therapeutic Strategy? , 2019, Front. Immunol..

[23]  Anjana Sharma,et al.  Polysaccharide-Based Hybrid Self-Healing Hydrogel Supports the Paracrine Response of Mesenchymal Stem Cells , 2019, ACS Applied Bio Materials.

[24]  P. Stoodley,et al.  In Vitro Efficacy of Antibiotics Released from Calcium Sulfate Bone Void Filler Beads , 2018, Materials.

[25]  L. Altomare,et al.  Bioactive Zn-doped hydroxyapatite coatings and their antibacterial efficacy against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus , 2018, Surface and Coatings Technology.

[26]  P. Büchler,et al.  Characterization of the electrical conductivity of bone and its correlation to osseous structure , 2018, Scientific Reports.

[27]  A. Musset,et al.  Bone substitutes: a review of their characteristics, clinical use, and perspectives for large bone defects management , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering.

[28]  A. Hasan,et al.  Advances in osteobiologic materials for bone substitutes , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[29]  K. Neoh,et al.  Electrical stimulation of adipose‐derived mesenchymal stem cells and endothelial cells co‐cultured in a conductive scaffold for potential orthopaedic applications , 2018, Journal of tissue engineering and regenerative medicine.

[30]  L. Lidgren,et al.  Gelatin‐ hydroxyapatite‐ calcium sulphate based biomaterial for long term sustained delivery of bone morphogenic protein‐2 and zoledronic acid for increased bone formation: In‐vitro and in‐vivo carrier properties , 2018, Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society.

[31]  Jaicy Jacob,et al.  Piezoelectric smart biomaterials for bone and cartilage tissue engineering , 2018, Inflammation and Regeneration.

[32]  Shuping Peng,et al.  Bone biomaterials and interactions with stem cells , 2017, Bone Research.

[33]  Tingting Wu,et al.  Novel Reduced Graphene Oxide/Zinc Silicate/Calcium Silicate Electroconductive Biocomposite for Stimulating Osteoporotic Bone Regeneration. , 2017, ACS applied materials & interfaces.

[34]  Mauro Petretta,et al.  Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering: State of the art and new perspectives. , 2017, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[35]  D. Qiu,et al.  Novel bioactive glass based injectable bone cement with improved osteoinductivity and its in vivo evaluation , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[36]  K. Yeung,et al.  Bone grafts and biomaterials substitutes for bone defect repair: A review , 2017, Bioactive materials.

[37]  P. Ma,et al.  Three-dimensional porous scaffold by self-assembly of reduced graphene oxide and nano-hydroxyapatite composites for bone tissue engineering , 2017 .

[38]  M. Osugi,et al.  Angiogenesis in newly regenerated bone by secretomes of human mesenchymal stem cells , 2017, Maxillofacial Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery.

[39]  Mangmang Li,et al.  Osteoblasts secrete Cxcl9 to regulate angiogenesis in bone , 2016, Nature Communications.

[40]  Guoxin Fan,et al.  Biocompatibility of artificial bone based on vancomycin loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticles and calcium sulfate composites , 2016, Journal of Materials Science: Materials in Medicine.

[41]  S. Vargas,et al.  Piezoelectric properties of synthetic hydroxyapatite-based organic-inorganic hydrated materials , 2016 .

[42]  S. G. Harroun,et al.  Self‐Assembly of Antimicrobial Peptides on Gold Nanodots: Against Multidrug‐Resistant Bacteria and Wound‐Healing Application , 2015 .

[43]  Seok Hee Kang,et al.  Synergistic effects of reduced graphene oxide and hydroxyapatite on osteogenic differentiation of MC3T3-E1 preosteoblasts , 2015 .

[44]  Dong Yang,et al.  Bone cement based on vancomycin loaded mesoporous silica nanoparticle and calcium sulfate composites. , 2015, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[45]  Jinchao Zhang,et al.  Gold nanoparticles stimulate differentiation and mineralization of primary osteoblasts through the ERK/MAPK signaling pathway. , 2014, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[46]  F. Yakuphanoglu,et al.  Dielectric properties of Fe doped hydroxyapatite prepared by sol-gel method , 2014 .

[47]  Lingzhou Zhao,et al.  Antibacterial effects and biocompatibility of titanium surfaces with graded silver incorporation in titania nanotubes. , 2014, Biomaterials.

[48]  R. Adams,et al.  Coupling of angiogenesis and osteogenesis by a specific vessel subtype in bone , 2014, Nature.

[49]  S. Bauer,et al.  Ferroelectric Polarization in Nanocrystalline Hydroxyapatite Thin Films on Silicon , 2013, Scientific Reports.

[50]  R. Rahbarghazi,et al.  Juxtacrine and paracrine interactions of rat marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, muscle-derived satellite cells, and neonatal cardiomyocytes with endothelial cells in angiogenesis dynamics. , 2013, Stem cells and development.

[51]  Chengtie Wu,et al.  The effect of plaster (CaSO4 ·1/2H2O) on the compressive strength, self-setting property, and in vitro bioactivity of silicate-based bone cement. , 2013, Journal of biomedical materials research. Part B, Applied biomaterials.

[52]  Hongzheng Chen,et al.  Graphene uniformly decorated with gold nanodots: in situ synthesis, enhanced dispersibility and applications , 2011 .

[53]  C. Yi,et al.  Gold nanoparticles promote osteogenic differentiation of mesenchymal stem cells through p38 MAPK pathway. , 2010, ACS nano.

[54]  J. Planell,et al.  Dynamics of bone marrow-derived endothelial progenitor cell/mesenchymal stem cell interaction in co-culture and its implications in angiogenesis. , 2010, Biochemical and biophysical research communications.

[55]  P. Tong,et al.  Study on injectable and degradable cement of calcium sulphate and calcium phosphate for bone repair , 2010, Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine.

[56]  J. Chaudhuri,et al.  Electrical characterization of hydroxyapatite-based bioceramics. , 2009, Acta biomaterialia.

[57]  Gil Rosenman,et al.  Piezoelectric Effect in Human Bones Studied in Nanometer Scale , 2004 .

[58]  Marvin W. Johnson,et al.  Comparison of the electromechanical effects in wet and dry bone , 1980 .

[59]  S. Lang,et al.  Pyroelectric Effect in Bone and Tendon , 1966, Nature.