Applying Metric and Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling to Ecological Studies: Some New Results

Metric (eigenanalysis) and nonmetric multidimensional scaling strategies for ecological ordination were compared. The results, based on simulated coenoplane data showing varying degrees of species turnover on two independent environmental axes, suggested some strong differences between metric and nonmetric scaling methods in their ability to recover underlying nonlinear data structures. Prior data standardization had important effects on the results of both metric and nonmetric scaling, though the effect varied with the ordination method used. Nonmetric multidimensional scaling based on Euclidean distance following stand norm standardization proved to be the best strategy for re- covering simulated coenoplane data. Of the metric strategies compared, correspondence analysis and the detrended form were the most successful. While detrending improved ordination configurations in some cases, in others it led to a distortion of results. It is suggested that none of the currently available ordination strategies is appropriate under all circumstances, and that future research in ordination methodology should emphasize a statistical rather than empirical approach.

[1]  J. Gower.  Some distance properties of latent root and vector methods used in multivariate analysis , 1966 .

[2]  R. Shepard.  Representation of structure in similarity data: Problems and prospects , 1974 .

[3]  H. Hotelling.  Analysis of a complex of statistical variables into principal components. , 1933 .

[4]  I. Noy-Meir,et al.  Divisive Polythetic Classification of Vegetation data by Optimized Division on Ordination Components , 1973 .

[5]  G. M. Southward,et al.  Analysis of Categorical Data: Dual Scaling and Its Applications , 1981 .

[6]  Michael R. Anderberg,et al.  Cluster Analysis for Applications , 1973 .

[7]  D. W. Goodall.  A New Similarity Index Based on Probability , 1966 .

[8]  M. Hill,et al.  Detrended correspondence analysis: an improved ordination technique , 1980 .

[9]  E. C. Pielou.  The Interpretation of Ecological Data: A Primer on Classification and Ordination , 1984 .

[10]  M. Hill,et al.  Reciprocal Averaging : an eigenvector method of ordination , 1973 .

[11]  Mark V. Wilson.  A Statistical Test of the Accuracy and Consistency of Ordinations , 1981 .

[12]  László Orlóci,et al.  An Agglomerative Method for Classification of Plant Communities , 1967 .

[13]  P. Schönemann,et al.  Fitting one matrix to another under choice of a central dilation and a rigid motion , 1970 .

[14]  R. Peet.  Ordination as a Tool for Analyzing Complex Data Sets , 1980 .

[15]  J. M. A. Swan,et al.  An Examination of Some Ordination Problems By Use of Simulated Vegetational Data , 1970 .

[16]  I. C. Prentice,et al.  NON-METRIC ORDINATION METHODS IN ECOLOGY , 1977 .

[17]  W. Torgerson.  Multidimensional scaling: I. Theory and method , 1952 .

[18]  J. Matthews.  AN APPLICATION OF NON-METRIC MULTIDIMENSIONAL SCALING TO THE CONSTRUCTION OF AN IMPROVED SPECIES PLEXUS , 1978 .

[19]  R. Whittaker,et al.  A comparative study of nonmetric ordinations. , 1981 .

[20]  M. Fasham,et al.  A Comparison of Nonmetric Multidimensional Scaling, Principal Components and Reciprocal Averaging for the Ordination of Simulated Coenoclines, and Coenoplanes , 1977 .

[21]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. I. , 1962 .

[22]  L. Orlóci,et al.  Management and multivariate analysis of vegetation data , 1983 .

[23]  J. Douglas Carroll,et al.  14 Multidimensional scaling and its applications , 1982, Classification, Pattern Recognition and Reduction of Dimensionality.

[24]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF RECIPROCAL AVERAGING AND OTHER ORDINATION TECHNIQUES , 1977 .

[25]  Mike P. Austin.  Searching for a Model for Use in Vegetation Analysis , 1980 .

[26]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Comparison of Ordination Techniques , 1972 .

[27]  M. Davison.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling and Its Applications , 1983 .

[28]  Mark Hill,et al.  Indicator species analysis, a divisive polythetic method of classification, and its application to a survey of native pinewoods in Scotland , 1975 .

[29]  E. J. Williams.  USE OF SCORES FOR THE ANALYSIS OF ASSOCIATION IN CONTINGENCY TABLES , 1952 .

[30]  J. Kruskal.  Multidimensional scaling by optimizing goodness of fit to a nonmetric hypothesis , 1964 .

[31]  R. Gittins,et al.  Canonical Analysis: A Review with Applications in Ecology , 1985 .

[32]  R. Shepard.  The analysis of proximities: Multidimensional scaling with an unknown distance function. II , 1962 .

[33]  P. Greig-Smith.  The development of numerical classification and ordination , 1980 .

[34]  Jean-Paul Benzecri,et al.  STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AS A TOOL TO MAKE PATTERNS EMERGE FROM DATA , 1969 .

[35]  R. Sibson.  Order Invariant Methods for Data Analysis , 1972 .

[36]  W. T. Williams,et al.  Data Transformations in Ecological Ordination: II. On the Meaning of Data Standardization , 1975 .

[37]  A. J. B. Anderson,et al.  Ordination Methods in Ecology , 1971 .

[38]  Forrest W. Young,et al.  Introduction to Multidimensional Scaling: Theory, Methods, and Applications , 1981 .

[39]  M. Austin,et al.  The Problem of Non-Linearity in Ordination: Experiments with Two-Gradient Models , 1971 .

[40]  Hugh G. Gauch,et al.  Multivariate analysis in community ecology , 1984 .

[41]  R. Green,et al.  Sampling Design and Statistical Methods for Environmental Biologists , 1979 .