Defining risk acceptance criteria in occupational settings: a case study in the furniture industrial sector

Abstract The use of appropriate acceptance criteria in the risk assessment process for occupational accidents is an important issue but often overlooked in the literature, particularly when new risk assessment methods are proposed and discussed. In most cases, there is no information on how or by whom they were defined, or even how companies can adapt them to their own circumstances. Bearing this in mind, this study analysed the problem of the definition of risk acceptance criteria for occupational settings, defining the quantitative acceptance criteria for the specific case study of the Portuguese furniture industrial sector. The key steps to be considered in formulating acceptance criteria were analysed in the literature review. By applying the identified steps, the acceptance criteria for the furniture industrial sector were then defined. The Cumulative Distribution Function (CDF) for the injury statistics of the industrial sector was identified as the maximum tolerable risk level. The acceptable threshold was defined by adjusting the CDF to the Occupational, Safety & Health (OSH) practitioners’ risk acceptance judgement. Adjustments of acceptance criteria to the companies’ safety cultures were exemplified by adjusting the Burr distribution parameters. An example of a risk matrix was also used to demonstrate the integration of the defined acceptance criteria into a risk metric. This work has provided substantial contributions to the issue of acceptance criteria for occupational accidents, which may be useful in overcoming the practical difficulties faced by authorities, companies and experts.

[1]  M. Bhasi,et al.  Safety climate factors and its relationship with accidents and personal attributes in the chemical industry. , 2009 .

[2]  Lionel H. Brooks On Acceptable Risk , 1976 .

[3]  Abel Pinto,et al.  Fuzzy approach for reducing subjectivity in estimating occupational accident severity. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[4]  L. Steg,et al.  Psychological factors influencing sustainable energy technology acceptance: A review-based comprehensive framework , 2012 .

[5]  Celeste Jacinto,et al.  A semi-quantitative assessment of occupational risks using bow-tie representation , 2010 .

[6]  Sivakumaran Bharadhwaj,et al.  Information search behaviour among new car buyers: A two-step cluster analysis , 2010 .

[7]  P. Arezes,et al.  Safety climate and its relationship with furniture companies’ safety performance and workers’ risk acceptance , 2015 .

[8]  Lien-Fu Lai,et al.  A Two-Step Method for Clustering Mixed Categroical and Numeric Data , 2010 .

[9]  D.N.D. Hartford,et al.  Legal framework considerations in the development of risk acceptance criteria , 2009 .

[10]  Jason Michael Woodruff,et al.  Consequence and likelihood in risk estimation: A matter of balance in UK health and safety risk assessment practice , 2005 .

[11]  P. K. Marhavilas,et al.  Risk analysis and assessment methodologies in the work sites: On a review, classification and comparative study of the scientific literature of the period 2000–2009 , 2011 .

[12]  Marvin Rausand,et al.  Foundations and choice of risk metrics , 2014 .

[13]  Anne Marsden,et al.  International Organization for Standardization , 2014 .

[14]  Celal Karpuz,et al.  Stochastic modeling of accident risks associated with an underground coal mine in Turkey , 2009 .

[15]  R. Macchiaroli,et al.  Appraisal of a new risk assessment model for SME , 2010 .

[16]  Dirk van Aken,et al.  Considerations in developing complete and quantified methods for risk assessment , 2008 .

[17]  Luis Onieva,et al.  Risk assessment of maintenance operations: the analysis of performing task and accident mechanism , 2015, International journal of injury control and safety promotion.

[18]  Celina Pinto Leão,et al.  Risk Acceptance in the Furniture Sector: Analysis of Acceptance Level and Relevant Influence Factors , 2015 .

[19]  Patrick J Coleman,et al.  Measuring mining safety with injury statistics: lost workdays as indicators of risk. , 2007, Journal of safety research.

[20]  Terje Aven,et al.  On the consistency of risk acceptance criteria with normative theories for decision-making , 2008, Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf..

[21]  Kent Jacob Nielsen,et al.  Changes in safety climate and accidents at two identical manufacturing plants , 2008 .

[22]  George Yannis,et al.  Patterns of pedestrian attitudes, perceptions and behaviour in Europe , 2013 .

[23]  N. Pidgeon Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme: why we do need risk perception research , 1998 .

[24]  S. A. Silva,et al.  Another look at safety climate and safety behavior: deepening the cognitive and social mediator mechanisms. , 2012, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[25]  Xavier Cuny,et al.  Occupational risks and the value and modelling of a measurement of severity , 1999 .

[26]  Erik Vanem,et al.  Ethics and fundamental principles of risk acceptance criteria , 2012 .

[27]  Dimitrios E. Koulouriotis,et al.  A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data : Application in an aluminum extrusion industry , 2008 .

[28]  Raghu Raman,et al.  Process Systems Risk Management , 2013 .

[29]  Stephen N. Luko,et al.  Risk Management Principles and Guidelines , 2013 .

[30]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  The role of risk perception for risk management , 1998 .

[31]  Torbjørn Rundmo,et al.  A longitudinal study of safety climate on the Norwegian continental shelf. , 2008 .

[32]  Chin-Shan Lu,et al.  Safety climate and safety behavior in the passenger ferry context. , 2011, Accident; analysis and prevention.

[33]  Lars Harms-Ringdahl,et al.  Guide To Safety Analysis for Accident Prevention , 2013 .

[34]  Celina Pinto Leão,et al.  Risk Decision: Main Constraints and Approaches , 2012 .

[35]  Urban Kjellén,et al.  Integrating analyses of the risk of occupational accidents into the design process Part I: A review of types of acceptance criteria and risk analysis methods , 1995 .

[36]  J M Miller,et al.  Inter-Rater and Intra-Rater Reliability in the Interpretation of MTI Photoscreener Photographs of Native American Preschool Children , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[37]  Åsa Boholm,et al.  Comparative studies of risk perception: a review of twenty years of research , 1998 .

[38]  Lamya A. Baharith,et al.  Marshall-Olkin Extended Burr Type XII Distribution , 2014 .

[39]  N. Pletneva COMMENTARY ON THE INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 31000–2009 “RISK MANAGEMENT. PRINCIPLES AND GUIDELINES” , 2014 .

[40]  M. Siegrist,et al.  Perception of Hazards: The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge , 2000, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[41]  Xavier Cuny,et al.  Statistical modelling and risk assessment , 2003 .