Cellular Post-Conditioning: Allogeneic Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Reduce Infarct Size and Attenuate Microvascular Obstruction When Administered After Reperfusion in Pigs With Acute Myocardial Infarction

Background— Intracoronary (IC) delivery of cardiosphere-derived cells (CDCs) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective in porcine and human chronic myocardial infarction (MI). However, IC delivery of CDCs after reperfusion in acute MI has never been assessed in a clinically-relevant large animal model. We tested CDCs as adjunctive therapy to reperfusion in a porcine model of MI. Methods and Results— First, escalating doses (5, 7.5 and 10 million [M] cells) of allogeneic CDCs (allo-CDCs) were administered IC 30 minutes after reperfusion. Forty-eight hours later, left ventriculography (LVG) but not 5M CDCs, relative to control. In the pivotal study, IS, MVO, cardiomyocyte apoptosis and adverse LV remodeling were all smaller in the CDC group than in sham or placebo groups. In addition, serum troponin I level at 24 hours was lower after CDC infusion than that in the placebo or sham groups, consistent with the histologically-demonstrated reduction in IS. Conclusions— IC delivery of allo-CDCs is safe, feasible and effective in cardioprotection, reducing IS, preventing MVO and attenuating adverse acute remodeling. This novel cardioprotective effect, which we call “cellular postconditioning”, differs from previous strategies to reduce IS in that it works even when initiated with significant delay after reflow.

[1]  E. Marbán,et al.  Validation of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging to Monitor Regenerative Efficacy After Cell Therapy in a Porcine Model of Convalescent Myocardial Infarction , 2013, Circulation.

[2]  R. Kloner Current State of Clinical Translation of Cardioprotective Agents for Acute Myocardial Infarction , 2013, Circulation research.

[3]  P. Serruys,et al.  Intracoronary Infusion of Allogeneic Mesenchymal Precursor Cells Directly After Experimental Acute Myocardial Infarction Reduces Infarct Size, Abrogates Adverse Remodeling, and Improves Cardiac Function , 2013, Circulation research.

[4]  E. Marbán,et al.  Allogeneic cardiospheres safely boost cardiac function and attenuate adverse remodeling after myocardial infarction in immunologically mismatched rat strains. , 2013, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[5]  E. Marbán,et al.  Cardiomyocyte proliferation and progenitor cell recruitment underlie therapeutic regeneration after myocardial infarction in the adult mouse heart , 2013, EMBO molecular medicine.

[6]  Eduardo Marbán,et al.  Magnetic Enhancement of Cell Retention, Engraftment, and Functional Benefit after Intracoronary Delivery of Cardiac-Derived Stem Cells in a Rat Model of Ischemia/Reperfusion , 2012, Cell transplantation.

[7]  Daniel Berman,et al.  Intracoronary cardiosphere-derived cells for heart regeneration after myocardial infarction (CADUCEUS): a prospective, randomised phase 1 trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[8]  E. Marbán,et al.  Direct comparison of different stem cell types and subpopulations reveals superior paracrine potency and myocardial repair efficacy with cardiosphere-derived cells. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[9]  E. Marbán,et al.  Safety and Efficacy of Allogeneic Cell Therapy in Infarcted Rats Transplanted With Mismatched Cardiosphere-Derived Cells , 2012, Circulation.

[10]  Marcus F Stoddard,et al.  Cardiac stem cells in patients with ischaemic cardiomyopathy (SCIPIO): initial results of a randomised phase 1 trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[11]  S. Combes,et al.  Delayed Postconditioning in the Mouse Heart In Vivo , 2011, Circulation.

[12]  L. V. Van Laake,et al.  miR-24 inhibits apoptosis and represses Bim in mouse cardiomyocytes , 2011, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[13]  F. Carlotti,et al.  Mesenchymal stem cells or cardiac progenitors for cardiac repair? A comparative study , 2011, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences.

[14]  Alessandro Giacomello,et al.  Relative Roles of Direct Regeneration Versus Paracrine Effects of Human Cardiosphere-Derived Cells Transplanted Into Infarcted Mice , 2010, Circulation research.

[15]  Hiroshi Sato,et al.  Intracoronary Administration of Cardiac Progenitor Cells Alleviates Left Ventricular Dysfunction in Rats With a 30-Day-Old Infarction , 2010, Circulation.

[16]  Tetsuo Sasano,et al.  Engraftment, Differentiation, and Functional Benefits of Autologous Cardiosphere-Derived Cells in Porcine Ischemic Cardiomyopathy , 2009, Circulation.

[17]  Leelee Ong,et al.  Is the intravascular administration of mesenchymal stem cells safe? Mesenchymal stem cells and intravital microscopy. , 2009, Microvascular research.

[18]  H. Matsubara,et al.  Controlled delivery of basic fibroblast growth factor promotes human cardiosphere-derived cell engraftment to enhance cardiac repair for chronic myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[19]  A. Ganser,et al.  Bone marrow cells are a rich source of growth factors and cytokines: implications for cell therapy trials after myocardial infarction. , 2008, European heart journal.

[20]  M. Gnecchi,et al.  Paracrine Mechanisms in Adult Stem Cell Signaling and Therapy , 2008, Circulation research.

[21]  E. Andreu,et al.  Characterization of the paracrine effects of human skeletal myoblasts transplanted in infarcted myocardium , 2008, European journal of heart failure.

[22]  R. Jaffe,et al.  Microvascular Obstruction and the No-Reflow Phenomenon After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention , 2008, Circulation.

[23]  Lawrence Buja,et al.  Comparison of intracoronary and transendocardial delivery of allogeneic mesenchymal cells in a canine model of acute myocardial infarction. , 2008, Journal of molecular and cellular cardiology.

[24]  Y. Yoon,et al.  Role of host tissues for sustained humoral effects after endothelial progenitor cell transplantation into the ischemic heart , 2007, The Journal of experimental medicine.

[25]  M. Swindle,et al.  Swine in the laboratory: surgery, anesthesia, imaging, and experimental techniques , 2007 .

[26]  A. Zeiher,et al.  Intracoronary bone marrow-derived progenitor cells in acute myocardial infarction. , 2006, The New England journal of medicine.

[27]  Robert L Wilensky,et al.  A quantitative, randomized study evaluating three methods of mesenchymal stem cell delivery following myocardial infarction. , 2006, European heart journal.

[28]  J. Ingwall,et al.  Evidence supporting paracrine hypothesis for Akt‐modified mesenchymal stem cell‐mediated cardiac protection and functional improvement , 2006, FASEB journal : official publication of the Federation of American Societies for Experimental Biology.

[29]  Jong Chun Park,et al.  The effects of mesenchymal stem cells transduced with Akt in a porcine myocardial infarction model. , 2005, Cardiovascular research.

[30]  J. Downey,et al.  Multiple, brief coronary occlusions during early reperfusion protect rabbit hearts by targeting cell signaling pathways. , 2004, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[31]  R. Guyton,et al.  Postconditioning attenuates myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury by inhibiting events in the early minutes of reperfusion. , 2004, Cardiovascular research.

[32]  M. Greeley,et al.  Intra-coronary arterial injection of mesenchymal stromal cells and microinfarction in dogs , 2004, The Lancet.

[33]  R. Guyton,et al.  Inhibition of myocardial injury by ischemic postconditioning during reperfusion: comparison with ischemic preconditioning. , 2003, American journal of physiology. Heart and circulatory physiology.

[34]  J. Boura,et al.  Primary angioplasty versus intravenous thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction : a quantitative review of 23 randomised trials , 2022 .

[35]  K. Okumura,et al.  Angiographic no-reflow phenomenon as a predictor of adverse long-term outcome in patients treated with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty for first acute myocardial infarction. , 2000, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[36]  J. Vinten-johansen,et al.  The role of neutrophils in myocardial ischemia-reperfusion injury. , 1999, Cardiovascular research.

[37]  B. Brodie,et al.  Importance of time to reperfusion for 30-day and late survival and recovery of left ventricular function after primary angioplasty for acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.

[38]  Katherine C. Wu,et al.  Prognostic significance of microvascular obstruction by magnetic resonance imaging in patients with acute myocardial infarction. , 1998, Circulation.

[39]  M. Hori,et al.  Clinical implications of the 'no reflow' phenomenon. A predictor of complications and left ventricular remodeling in reperfused anterior wall myocardial infarction. , 1996, Circulation.

[40]  G. Lamas,et al.  Ventricular remodeling after myocardial infarction. , 1993, Advances in experimental medicine and biology.

[41]  M. Pfeffer,et al.  Ventricular Remodeling After Myocardial Infarction: Experimental Observations and Clinical Implications , 1990, Circulation.

[42]  M. Fishbein,et al.  Early phase acute myocardial infarct size quantification: validation of the triphenyl tetrazolium chloride tissue enzyme staining technique. , 1981, American heart journal.