Diffusion-weighted MRI of the prostate at 3.0 T: comparison of endorectal coil (ERC) MRI and phased-array coil (PAC) MRI-The impact of SNR on ADC measurement.

PURPOSE To compare ADC values measured from diffusion-weighted MR (DW-MR) images of the prostate obtained with both endorectal and phased-array coils (ERC+PAC) to those from DW-MRI images obtained with an eight-channel torso phased-array coil (PAC) at 3.0 T. METHODS The institutional review board issued a waiver of informed consent for this HIPAA-compliant study. Twenty-five patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent standard 3-T MRI using 2 different coil arrangements (ERC+PAC and PAC only) in the same session. DW-MRI at five b-values (0, 600, 1000, 1200, and 1500 s/mm(2)) were acquired using both coil arrangements. On b=0 images, signal-to-noise ratios (SNRs) were measured as the ratio of the mean signal from PZ and TZ ROIs to the standard deviation from the mean signal in an artifact-free ROI in the rectum. Matching regions-of-interest (ROIs) were identified in the peripheral zone and transition zone on ERC-MRI and PAC-MRI. For each ROI, mean ADC values for all zero and non-zero b-value combinations were computed. RESULTS Mean SNR with ERC-MRI at PZ (66.33 ± 27.07) and TZ (32.69 ± 12.52) was 9.27 and 5.52 times higher than with PAC-MRI ((7.32 ± 2.30) and (6.13 ± 1.56), respectively) (P<0.0001 for both). ADCs from DW-MR images obtained with all b-values in the PZ and TZ were significantly lower with PAC-MRI than with ERC-MRI (P<0.001 for all). CONCLUSION Lower SNR of DW-MR images of the prostate obtained with a PAC can significantly decrease ADC values at higher b-values compared to similar measurements obtained using the ERC. To address these requirements, clinical MR systems should have image processing capabilities which incorporate the noise distribution.

[1]  K. Hosseinzadeh,et al.  Endorectal diffusion‐weighted imaging in prostate cancer to differentiate malignant and benign peripheral zone tissue , 2004, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[2]  Baris Turkbey,et al.  Imaging localized prostate cancer: current approaches and new developments. , 2009, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[3]  Yousef Mazaheri,et al.  Diffusion-weighted endorectal MR imaging at 3 T for prostate cancer: tumor detection and assessment of aggressiveness. , 2011, Radiology.

[4]  P. Choyke,et al.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. , 2009, Neoplasia.

[5]  Pierrick Coupé,et al.  Rician Noise Removal by Non-Local Means Filtering for Low Signal-to-Noise Ratio MRI: Applications to DT-MRI , 2008, MICCAI.

[6]  P. Carroll,et al.  Carcinoma of the prostate gland: MR imaging with pelvic phased-array coils versus integrated endorectal--pelvic phased-array coils. , 1994, Radiology.

[7]  Stephan E Maier,et al.  Biexponential characterization of prostate tissue water diffusion decay curves over an extended b-factor range. , 2006, Magnetic resonance imaging.

[8]  B. Issa,et al.  In vivo measurement of the apparent diffusion coefficient in normal and malignant prostatic tissues using echo‐planar imaging , 2002, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[9]  Anders Kristoffersen,et al.  Optimal estimation of the diffusion coefficient from non-averaged and averaged noisy magnitude data. , 2007, Journal of magnetic resonance.

[10]  B. K. Park,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of the Prostate at 3 T for Differentiation of Malignant and Benign Tissue in Transition and Peripheral Zones: Preliminary Results , 2007, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[11]  Jelle O. Barentsz,et al.  Prostate cancer: comparison of local staging accuracy of pelvic phased-array coil alone versus integrated endorectal–pelvic phased-array coils , 2007, European Radiology.

[12]  J. E. Tanner,et al.  Spin diffusion measurements : spin echoes in the presence of a time-dependent field gradient , 1965 .

[13]  Thomas Hambrock,et al.  Prostate cancer: body-array versus endorectal coil MR imaging at 3 T--comparison of image quality, localization, and staging performance. , 2007, Radiology.

[14]  R. Henkelman.  Measurement of signal intensities in the presence of noise in MR images. , 1985, Medical physics.

[15]  G. Johnson,et al.  Prostate cancer: feasibility and preliminary experience of a diffusional kurtosis model for detection and assessment of aggressiveness of peripheral zone cancer. , 2012, Radiology.

[16]  L. Turnbull,et al.  Diffusion Imaging of the Prostate at 3.0 Tesla , 2006, Investigative radiology.

[17]  M. Orton,et al.  Robust estimation of the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in heterogeneous solid tumors , 2009, Magnetic resonance in medicine.

[18]  K. Sugimura,et al.  High b-value diffusion-weighted imaging in normal and malignant peripheral zone tissue of the prostate: effect of signal-to-noise ratio. , 2008, Magnetic resonance in medical sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.

[19]  C. Kim,et al.  High-b-value diffusion-weighted imaging at 3 T to detect prostate cancer: comparisons between b values of 1,000 and 2,000 s/mm2. , 2010, AJR. American journal of roentgenology.

[20]  N. D. de Souza,et al.  Diffusion‐weighted imaging of the prostate and rectal wall: comparison of biexponential and monoexponential modelled diffusion and associated perfusion coefficients , 2009, NMR in biomedicine.

[21]  Takuya Ueda,et al.  Diffusion-Weighted Imaging of Prostate Cancer , 2005, Journal of computer assisted tomography.

[22]  H. Hricak,et al.  Value of the hemorrhage exclusion sign on T1-weighted prostate MR images for the detection of prostate cancer. , 2012, Radiology.

[23]  Takeo Ishigaki,et al.  Differentiation of noncancerous tissue and cancer lesions by apparent diffusion coefficient values in transition and peripheral zones of the prostate , 2005, Journal of magnetic resonance imaging : JMRI.

[24]  David Atkinson,et al.  Apparent diffusion coefficient estimation in prostate DW-MRI using maximum likelihood , 2012 .

[25]  T. Metens,et al.  What is the optimal b value in diffusion-weighted MR imaging to depict prostate cancer at 3T? , 2012, European Radiology.

[26]  Koichi Oshio,et al.  Biexponential apparent diffusion coefficients in prostate cancer. , 2009, Magnetic resonance imaging.