Unintentional Fusion in Preserved Facet Joints without Bone Grafting after Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion

Introduction A percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (PETLIF) procedure has been previously developed. During postoperative follow-up, in some patients, bone fusion occurred between opened facet joints, despite not having bone grafting in the facet joints. Here, we investigated facet fusion's frequency and tendencies following PETLIF. Methods A retrospective analysis was conducted on a prospectively collected, nonrandomized series of patients. Forty-two patients (6 males and 36 females, average age: 69.9 years) who underwent single-level PETLIF at our hospital from February 2016 to March 2019 were included in this study. Patients were assessed with lumbar X-ray images and computed tomography (CT) prior to, immediately after, and 1 year after surgery. Results Pseudarthrosis was not observed in any patients, and facet fusion was observed in 26 of 42 post-PETLIF patients (61.9%) by CT 1 year postoperatively. The average interfacet distance increased from 1.3 mm preoperatively to 4.5 mm postoperatively, and facet fusion was observed under the opened conditions of 3.8 mm at 1 year. Segmental lordotic angle of the fusion segment in the lumbar X-ray images was significantly larger in the facet fusion subgroup prior to surgery, immediately following surgery, and 1 year after surgery compared to the facet non-fusion group (p=0.02, p<0.01, p=0.01, respectively). There were no significant differences in patient background, correction loss of segmental lordosis, interfacet distance, or clinical score between the facet fusion and facet non-fusion subgroups. Conclusions Facet fusion was achieved over time within the facet joints that were opened through indirect decompression after PETLIF. We hypothesized that the preserved facet joints potentially became the base bed for spontaneous bone fusion due to the preserved facet joint capsule and surrounding soft tissue, which maintained cranio-caudal facet traffic and blood circulation in the facet joints. The complete preservation of the facet joints was a key advantage of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedures. Level of evidence Level III

[1]  Tsung-Hsi Tu,et al.  Unintended facet fusions after Dynesys dynamic stabilization in patients with spondylolisthesis. , 2019, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[2]  Manabu Ito,et al.  Early Clinical Results of Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A New Modified Technique for Treating Degenerative Lumbar Spondylolisthesis , 2018, Spine surgery and related research.

[3]  K. Satake,et al.  Nonunion of Transpsoas Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using an Allograft: Clinical Assessment and Risk Factors , 2018, Spine surgery and related research.

[4]  Jin-Sung Kim,et al.  Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion at L5-S1 through a Unilateral Approach: Technical Feasibility and Outcomes , 2016, BioMed research international.

[5]  R. Isaacs,et al.  Two-Year Comparative Outcomes of MIS Lateral and MIS Transforaminal Interbody Fusion in the Treatment of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis: Part II Radiographic Findings , 2016, Spine.

[6]  Juan S. Uribe,et al.  Minimally invasive lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas interbody fusion for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: clinical outcomes. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[7]  H. Terai,et al.  Radiographic evaluation of postoperative bone regrowth after microscopic bilateral decompression via a unilateral approach for degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis. , 2013, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[8]  D. Togawa,et al.  Does alendronate disturb the healing process of posterior lumbar interbody fusion? A prospective randomized trial. , 2011, Journal of neurosurgery. Spine.

[9]  A. Minami,et al.  Clinical Outcome of Posterolateral Endoscopic Surgery for Pyogenic Spondylodiscitis: Results of 15 Patients With Serious Comorbid Conditions , 2007, Spine.

[10]  D. Togawa,et al.  A minimum 10-year follow-up of posterior dynamic stabilization using Graf artificial ligament. , 2006, Spine.

[11]  D. Togawa,et al.  A Prospective Randomized Study of Posterolateral Lumbar Fusion Using Osteogenic Protein-1 (OP-1) Versus Local Autograft With Ceramic Bone Substitute: Emphasis of Surgical Exploration and Histologic Assessment , 2006, Spine.

[12]  S. Ohtori,et al.  Insertional torque of the lumbar pedicle screw during surgery , 2005, Journal of orthopaedic science : official journal of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association.

[13]  K. Shigenobu,et al.  Non-Fusion Surgery for Degenerative Spondylolisthesis Using Artificial Ligament Stabilization: Surgical Indication and Clinical Results , 2005, Spine.

[14]  Y. Ohkoshi,et al.  Clinical Results of Single-Level Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using the Brantigan I/F Carbon Cage Filled With a Mixture of Local Morselized Bone and Bioactive Ceramic Granules , 2002, Spine.

[15]  P. Guigui,et al.  Radiologic and computed tomography image evaluation of bone regrowth after wide surgical decompression for lumbar stenosis. , 1999, Spine.

[16]  P. Kambin,et al.  Arthroscopic discectomy of the lumbar spine. , 1997, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[17]  K Kaneda,et al.  The Mechanical Properties of the Human L4–5 Functional Spinal Unit During Cyclic Loading: The Structural Effects of the Posterior Elements , 1992, Spine.

[18]  P. Kambin,et al.  Posterolateral percutaneous suction-excision of herniated lumbar intervertebral discs. Report of interim results. , 1986, Clinical orthopaedics and related research.

[19]  P. Campbell,et al.  Short-term outcomes of lateral lumbar interbody fusion without decompression for the treatment of symptomatic degenerative spondylolisthesis at L4-5. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.

[20]  L. Schultz,et al.  Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. , 2018, Neurosurgical focus.