Editors’ Review and Introduction: Levels of Explanation in Cognitive Science: From Molecules to Culture

Abstract Cognitive science began as a multidisciplinary endeavor to understand how the mind works. Since the beginning, cognitive scientists have been asking questions about the right methodologies and levels of explanation to pursue this goal, and make cognitive science a coherent science of the mind. Key questions include: Is there a privileged level of explanation in cognitive science? How do different levels of explanation fit together, or relate to one another? How should explanations at one level inform or constrain explanations at some other level? Can the different approaches to the mind, brain, and culture be unified? The aim of this issue of topiCS is to provide a platform for discussing different answers to such questions and to facilitate a better understanding between the different strands of thinking about the right levels of explanation in cognitive science.

[1]  Gary Marcus,et al.  Deep Learning: A Critical Appraisal , 2018, ArXiv.

[2]  Thomas W. Polger,et al.  The Multiple Realization Book , 2016 .

[3]  Burton S. Guttman Commentary: Is “Levels of Organization” a Useful Biological Concept? , 1976 .

[4]  J. Fodor Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis) , 1974, Synthese.

[5]  A. Clark Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. , 2013, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[6]  John Bickle,et al.  Laser Lights and Designer Drugs: New Techniques for Descending Levels of Mechanisms "in a Single Bound"? , 2020, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[7]  G. Rees The new phrenology: the limits of localizing cognitive processes in the brain , 2002 .

[8]  Angela Potochnik,et al.  Patterns in Cognitive Phenomena and Pluralism of Explanatory Styles. , 2019, Topics in cognitive science.

[9]  Tania Lombrozo,et al.  Experiential Explanation , 2020, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[10]  Bradley C. Love,et al.  Thirty years of Marr's Vision: Levels of Analysis in Cognitive Science , 2015, CogSci.

[11]  D. Davidson Actions, Reasons, And Causes , 1980 .

[12]  G. Miller The cognitive revolution: a historical perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[13]  Patrick F Sullivan,et al.  No Support for Historical Candidate Gene or Candidate Gene-by-Interaction Hypotheses for Major Depression Across Multiple Large Samples. , 2019, The American journal of psychiatry.

[14]  M. A. MacIver,et al.  Neuroscience Needs Behavior: Correcting a Reductionist Bias , 2017, Neuron.

[15]  HERBERT A. SIMON,et al.  The Architecture of Complexity , 1991 .

[16]  S M Kosslyn,et al.  If neuroimaging is the answer, what is the question? , 1999, Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences.

[17]  Zoe Drayson,et al.  The Personal/Subpersonal Distinction , 2014 .

[18]  Matteo Colombo,et al.  Experimental Philosophy of Explanation Rising: The Case for a Plurality of Concepts of Explanation , 2017, Cogn. Sci..

[19]  Andrew Shtulman,et al.  Competing Explanations of Competing Explanations: Accounting for Conflict Between Scientific and Folk Explanations , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[20]  Alexandre Pouget,et al.  A better way to crack the brain , 2016, Nature.

[21]  R. Núñez,et al.  What happened to cognitive science? , 2019, Nature Human Behaviour.

[22]  Gualtiero Piccinini,et al.  Integrating psychology and neuroscience: functional analyses as mechanism sketches , 2011, Synthese.

[23]  Gerd Gigerenzer,et al.  How to Explain Behavior? , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[24]  Luciano Floridi,et al.  The Method of Levels of Abstraction , 2008, Minds and Machines.

[25]  W. Wimsatt The Ontology of Complex Systems: Levels of Organization, Perspectives, and Causal Thickets , 1994 .

[26]  Stephen H. Kellert,et al.  Introduction The Pluralist Stance , 2008 .

[27]  H. Putnam,et al.  Unity of Science as a Working Hypothesis , 1958 .

[28]  Andrea Bender,et al.  The Role of Culture and Evolution for Human Cognition , 2020, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[29]  David J. Chalmers,et al.  A Computational Foundation for the Study of Cognition , 2011 .

[30]  David Danks,et al.  Unifying the Mind: Cognitive Representations as Graphical Models , 2014 .

[32]  T. Sejnowski,et al.  Perspectives on cognitive neuroscience. , 1988, Science.

[33]  Gregor Schöner,et al.  The Dynamics of Neural Populations Capture the Laws of the Mind , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[34]  Iris van Rooij,et al.  How Intractability Spans the Cognitive and Evolutionary Levels of Explanation , 2020, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[35]  Joshua B. Tenenbaum,et al.  Building machines that learn and think like people , 2016, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[36]  P. Anderson More is different. , 1972, Science.

[37]  Bernhard Hommel,et al.  Pseudo‐mechanistic Explanations in Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience , 2019, Top. Cogn. Sci..