Towards a fair and transparent research participant compensation and reimbursement framework in Vietnam

Abstract Background Providing compensation for participants in clinical research is well established and while international guidelines exist, defining a context-specific and fair compensation for participants in low-resource settings is challenging due to ethical concerns and the lack of practical, national compensation and reimbursement frameworks. Methods We reviewed Oxford University Clinical Research Unit (OUCRU) internal reimbursement documentation over a 10-y period and conducted a scoping literature review to expand our knowledge of compensation and reimbursement practices including ethical concerns. We developed a preliminary reimbursement framework that was presented to community advisory boards (CAB) and clinical investigators to assess its applicability, fairness and transparency. Results The main topics discussed at the workshops centered on fairness and whether the reimbursements could be perceived as financial incentives. Other decisive factors in the decision-making process were altruism and the loss of caregivers’ earnings. Investigators raised the issue of additional burdens, whereas the CAB members were focused on non-monetary elements such as the healthcare quality the patients would receive. All elements discussed were reviewed and, where possible, incorporated into the final framework. Conclusion Our new reimbursement framework provides a consistent, fair and transparent decision-making process and will be implemented across all future OUCRU clinical research in Vietnam.

[1]  S. Bull,et al.  Researcher and study participants’ perspectives of consent in clinical studies in four referral hospitals in Vietnam , 2020, BMC Medical Ethics.

[2]  S. Baker,et al.  Expert voices and equal partnerships: establishing Controlled Human Infection Models (CHIMs) in Vietnam , 2019, Wellcome open research.

[3]  G. Persad,et al.  Differential payment to research participants in the same study: an ethical analysis , 2019, Journal of Medical Ethics.

[4]  Seema K. Shah,et al.  Exploring Ethical Concerns About Human Challenge Studies: A Qualitative Study of Controlled Human Malaria Infection Study Participants’ Motivations and Attitudes , 2018, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[5]  V. Mwapasa,et al.  A Malawi guideline for research study participant remuneration , 2018, Wellcome open research.

[6]  P. Njuguna,et al.  Ethical considerations in Controlled Human Malaria Infection studies in low resource settings: Experiences and perceptions of study participants in a malaria Challenge study in Kenya , 2018, Wellcome open research.

[7]  I. Cohen,et al.  A Framework for Ethical Payment to Research Participants , 2018, The New England journal of medicine.

[8]  Derek R. Smith,et al.  A review of Vietnam’s healthcare reform through the Direction of Healthcare Activities (DOHA) , 2017, Environmental Health and Preventive Medicine.

[9]  C. Grady,et al.  Phase 1 healthy volunteer willingness to participate and enrollment preferences , 2017, Clinical trials.

[10]  A. Guta,et al.  "We're giving you something so we get something in return": Perspectives on research participation and compensation among people living with HIV who use drugs. , 2017, The International journal on drug policy.

[11]  P. Kingori The ‘empty choice’: A sociological examination of choosing medical research participation in resource-limited Sub-Saharan Africa , 2015, Current sociology. La Sociologie contemporaine.

[12]  V. Marsh,et al.  Benefits in Cash or in Kind? A Community Consultation on Types of Benefits in Health Research on the Kenyan Coast , 2015, PloS one.

[13]  J. Mfutso-Bengo,et al.  Motivational Factors for Participation in Biomedical Research , 2015, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[14]  V. Marsh,et al.  What Are Fair Study Benefits in International Health Research? Consulting Community Members in Kenya , 2014, PloS one.

[15]  S. Whyte Therapeutic research in low-income countries: studying trial communities , 2014, Archives of Disease in Childhood.

[16]  Matthew M Davis,et al.  Research Participation by Low‐Income and Racial/Ethnic Minority Groups: How Payment May Change the Balance , 2013, Clinical and translational science.

[17]  Mansi C. Pandya,et al.  Compensation in clinical research: The debate continues , 2013, Perspectives in clinical research.

[18]  V. Marsh,et al.  Benefits and payments for research participants: Experiences and views from a research centre on the Kenyan coast , 2012, BMC medical ethics.

[19]  C. Grady,et al.  Money, coercion, and undue inducement: attitudes about payments to research participants. , 2012, IRB.

[20]  L. Stanberry,et al.  Perceptions of Reimbursement for Clinical Trial Participation , 2011, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[21]  C. Grady,et al.  More than the money: a review of the literature examining healthy volunteer motivations. , 2011, Contemporary clinical trials.

[22]  C. Gennings,et al.  Why Do We Pay? A National Survey of Investigators and IRB Chairpersons , 2010, Journal of empirical research on human research ethics : JERHRE.

[23]  Shreyasee S. Pradhan,et al.  What Leads Indians to Participate in Clinical Trials? A Meta-Analysis of Qualitative Studies , 2010, PloS one.

[24]  C Flexner,et al.  Payment to Healthy Volunteers in Clinical Research: The Research Subject's Perspective , 2010, Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics.

[25]  Raisa B Gul,et al.  Clinical trials: the challenge of recruitment and retention of participants. , 2010, Journal of clinical nursing.

[26]  S. Emanuel,et al.  Patients’ motivations for participating in cardiovascular clinical trials: a local perspective , 2009, Cardiovascular journal of Africa.

[27]  A. Iltis Payments to normal healthy volunteers in phase 1 trials: avoiding undue influence while distributing fairly the burdens of research participation. , 2009, The Journal of medicine and philosophy.

[28]  C. Slack,et al.  Payment of trial participants can be ethically sound: moving past a flat rate. , 2008, South African medical journal = Suid-Afrikaanse tydskrif vir geneeskunde.

[29]  C. Grady,et al.  Payment of clinical research subjects. , 2005, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[30]  C. Grady,et al.  What's the price of a research subject? Approaches to payment for research participation. , 1999, The New England journal of medicine.