Comparisons of a Computer-Based Propagation Prediction Tool with Experimental Data Collected in Urban Microcelluar Environments

Engineers designing and installing outdoor and indoor wireless communications systems need effective and practical tools to help them determine base station antenna locations for adequate signal coverage. Computer-based radio propagation prediction tools are now often used in designing these systems. We assess the performance of such a propagation tool based on ray-tracing and advanced computational methods. We have compared its predictions with outdoor experimental data collected in Manhattan and Boston (at 900 MHz and 2 GHz). The comparisons show that the computer-based propagation tool can predict signal strengths in these environments with very good accuracy. The prediction errors are within 6 dB in both mean and standard deviation. This shows that simulations, rather than costly field measurements, can lead to accurate determination of the coverage area for a given system design.

[1]  Andrea J. Goldsmith,et al.  A Measurement-Based Model for Predicting Coverage Areas of Urban Microcells , 1993, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun..

[2]  H. R. Anderson.  A ray-tracing propagation model for digital broadcast systems in urban areas , 1993 .

[3]  R. Luebbers.  Finite conductivity uniform GTD versus knife edge diffraction in prediction of propagation path loss , 1984 .

[4]  J.-F. Wagen,et al.  Simulation of radio wave propagation in urban microcellular environments , 1993, Proceedings of 2nd IEEE International Conference on Universal Personal Communications.

[5]  Feng Niu,et al.  Path loss and cell coverage of urban microcells in high-rise building environments , 1993, Proceedings of GLOBECOM '93. IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference.

[6]  Brian W. Kernighan,et al.  WISE design of indoor wireless systems: practical computation and optimization , 1995 .

[7]  A. J. Rustako,et al.  Diffraction around corners and its effects on the microcell coverage area in urban and suburban environments at 900 MHz, 2 GHz, and 6 GHz , 1994, 1994 IEEE GLOBECOM. Communications: The Global Bridge.

[8]  V. Erceg,et al.  Diffraction around corners and its effects on the microcell coverage area in urban and suburban environments at 900 MHz, 2 GHz, and 4 GHz , 1994 .

[9]  Reinaldo A. Valenzuela.  A ray tracing approach to predicting indoor wireless transmission , 1993, IEEE 43rd Vehicular Technology Conference.

[10]  Theodore S. Rappaport,et al.  A ray tracing technique to predict path loss and delay spread inside buildings , 1992, [Conference Record] GLOBECOM '92 - Communications for Global Users: IEEE.

[11]  Henry L. Bertoni,et al.  Bilateral averaging over receiving and transmitting areas for accurate measurements of sector average signal strength inside buildings , 1995 .

[12]  R. Gahleitner,et al.  A ray splitting model for indoor radio propagation associated with complex geometries , 1993, IEEE 43rd Vehicular Technology Conference.

[13]  A. J. Rustako,et al.  Measurements of microcellular propagation loss at 6 GHz and 2 GHz over non-line-of-sight paths in the city of Boston , 1995, Proceedings of GLOBECOM '95.

[14]  H. Ryuko,et al.  Investigation of propagation characteristics above 1 GHz for microcellular land mobile radio , 1990, 40th IEEE Conference on Vehicular Technology.