Can Changes in Canopy and/or Root System Architecture Explain Historical Maize Yield Trends in the U.S. Corn Belt?

Continuous increase in the yield of maize (Zea mays L.) in the U.S. Corn Be-It has involved an interaction with plant density. A number of contributing traits and mechanisms have been suggested. In this Study we used a modeling approach to examine whether changes in canopy and/or root system architecture might explain the observed trends. A maize crop model was generalized so that changes in canopy and root system architecture could be examined. A layered, diurnal canopy photosynthesis model was introduced to predict consequences of change in canopy architecture. A two-dimensional root exploration model was introduced to predict consequences of change in root system architecture. Field experiments were conducted to derive model parameters for the base hybrid (Pioneer 3394). Simulation studies for various canopy and root system architectures were undertaken for a range of sites, soils, and densities. Simulated responses to density compared well with those found in field experiments. The analysis indicated that (i) change in root system architecture and water capture had a direct effect on biomass accumulation and historical yield trends; and (ii) change in canopy architecture had little direct effect but likely had important indirect effects via leaf area retention and partitioning of carbohydrate to the ear, The study provided plausible explarations and identified testable hypotheses for future research and crop improvement effort.

[1]  William A. Williams,et al.  A model for simulating photosynthesis in plant communities , 1967 .

[2]  J. Passioura,et al.  Roots and drought resistance , 1983 .

[3]  J. Monteith How do crops manipulate water supply and demand? , 1986, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Physical Sciences.

[4]  L. M. Dwyer,et al.  Leaf area development in field-grown maize , 1986 .

[5]  J. Goudriaan,et al.  SEPARATING THE DIFFUSE AND DIRECT COMPONENT OF GLOBAL RADIATION AND ITS IMPLICATIONS FOR MODELING CANOPY PHOTOSYNTHESIS PART I. COMPONENTS OF INCOMING RADIATION , 1986 .

[6]  J. R. Kiniry,et al.  CERES-Maize: a simulation model of maize growth and development , 1986 .

[7]  K. J. Mccree Sensitivity of Sorghum Grain Yield to Ontogenetic Changes in Respiration Coeffecients , 1988 .

[8]  Takeshi Horie,et al.  Leaf Nitrogen, Photosynthesis, and Crop Radiation Use Efficiency: A Review , 1989 .

[9]  I. F. Wardlaw,et al.  Tansley Review No. 27 The control of carbon partitioning in plants. , 1990, The New phytologist.

[10]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Radiation Use Efficiency of an Old and a New Maize Hybrid , 1992 .

[11]  G. Edmeades,et al.  Causes for Silk Delay in a Lowland Tropical Maize Population , 1993 .

[12]  F. Andrade,et al.  Intercepted radiation at flowering and kernel number in maize : shade versus plant density effects , 1993 .

[13]  Holger Meinke,et al.  Potential soil water extraction by sunflower on a range of soils , 1993 .

[14]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Water extraction by grain sorghum in a sub-humid environment. I. Analysis of the water extraction pattern , 1993 .

[15]  Holger Meinke,et al.  A sunflower simulation model: I. Model development , 1993 .

[16]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  A theoretical analysis of nitrogen and radiation effects on radiation use efficiency in peanut , 1994 .

[17]  G. Hammer,et al.  Distribution of nitrogen and radiation use efficiency in peanut canopies , 1994 .

[18]  G. Hammer,et al.  Growth and yield response of barley and chickpea to water stress under three environments in southeast Queensland. II. Root growth and soil water extraction pattern , 1995 .

[19]  G. Edmeades,et al.  The importance of the anthesis-silking interval in breeding for drought tolerance in tropical maize , 1996 .

[20]  G. Hammer,et al.  On the extent of genetic variation for transpiration efficiency in sorghum , 1997 .

[21]  Richard D. Firn,et al.  Solving the puzzle of gravitropism — has a lost piece been found? , 1997, Planta.

[22]  J. L. Dardanelli,et al.  ROOTING DEPTH AND SOIL WATER EXTRACTION PATTERNS OF DIFFERENT CROPS IN A SILTY LOAM HAPLUSTOLL , 1997 .

[23]  Garry C. Whitelam,et al.  The shade avoidance syndrome: multiple responses mediated by multiple phytochromes , 1997 .

[24]  C. Ballaré,et al.  Foraging for light: photosensory ecology and agricultural implications , 1997 .

[25]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Grain yield components in maize: I. Ear growth and kernel set , 1998 .

[26]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Improved methods for predicting individual leaf area and leaf senescence in maize (Zea mays) , 1998 .

[27]  R. Bonhomme,et al.  Do Variations in Local Leaf Irradiance Explain Changes to Leaf Nitrogen within Row Maize Canopies , 1999 .

[28]  J. Boyer,et al.  Starch and the control of kernel number in maize at low water potentials. , 1999, Plant physiology.

[29]  S. Chapman,et al.  Selection Improves Drought Tolerance in Tropical Maize Populations: II. Direct and Correlated Responses among Secondary Traits , 1999 .

[30]  M. Cantarero,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Maize , 1999 .

[31]  T. Sinclair,et al.  Erect Leaves and Photosynthesis in Rice , 1999, Science.

[32]  Jean-Marcel Ribaut,et al.  The Role and Regulation of the Anthesis‐Silking Interval in Maize , 2000 .

[33]  G. Hammer,et al.  Nitrogen Dynamics and the Physiological Basis of Stay‐Green in Sorghum , 2000 .

[34]  V. Sadras,et al.  Reproductive partitioning and seed set efficiency in soybean, sunflower and maize , 2001 .

[35]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Stay‐green: A consequence of the balance between supply and demand for nitrogen during grain filling? , 2001 .

[36]  M. Otegui,et al.  Plant population density, row spacing and hybrid effects on maize canopy architecture and light attenuation , 2001 .

[37]  Allison E. Cocke,et al.  Light interacts with auxin during leaf elongation and leaf angle development in young corn seedlings , 2002, Planta.

[38]  Graeme L. Hammer,et al.  Future contributions of crop modelling—from heuristics and supporting decision making to understanding genetic regulation and aiding crop improvement , 2002 .

[39]  C. Rampazzo,et al.  Response of Brazilian maize hybrids from different eras to changes in plant density , 2002 .

[40]  Bruno Andrieu,et al.  Maize Leaves Turn Away from Neighbors1 , 2002, Plant Physiology.

[41]  S. Kaeppler,et al.  Quantitative trait loci controlling leaf and tassel traits in a B73 × Mo17 population of maize , 2002 .

[42]  Senthold Asseng,et al.  An overview of APSIM, a model designed for farming systems simulation , 2003 .

[43]  G. Hammer,et al.  Simulation Supplements Field Studies to Determine No-Till Dryland Corn Population Recommendations for Semiarid Western Nebraska , 2003 .

[44]  Quantifying nitrogen effects on crop growth processes in maize and sunflower , 2003 .

[45]  J. Mullen,et al.  Genetic analysis of the gravitropic set-point angle in lateral roots of Arabidopsis. , 2003, Advances in space research : the official journal of the Committee on Space Research.

[46]  J. Ritchie,et al.  Model Concepts to Express Genetic Differences in Maize Yield Components , 2003 .

[47]  Mark E. Cooper,et al.  Improving drought tolerance in maize: a view from industry , 2004 .

[48]  M. Tollenaar,et al.  Kernel Number Determination in Argentinean Maize Hybrids Released between 1965 and 1993 , 2004 .

[49]  G. Slafer,et al.  Seed dry weight response to source–sink manipulations in wheat, maize and soybean: a quantitative reappraisal , 2004 .

[50]  G. Hammer,et al.  Modelling the effects of row configuration on sorghum yield reliability in north-eastern Australia , 2005 .

[51]  Steve Langton,et al.  Classification of maize environments using crop simulation and geographic information systems , 2005 .

[52]  Kenneth G. Cassman,et al.  Maize Radiation Use Efficiency under Optimal Growth Conditions , 2005 .

[53]  G. Hammer,et al.  Potential yield and water-use efficiency benefits in sorghum from limited maximum transpiration rate. , 2005, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[54]  Roberto Tuberosa,et al.  Root-ABA1, a major constitutive QTL, affects maize root architecture and leaf ABA concentration at different water regimes. , 2005, Journal of experimental botany.

[55]  Lianhai Wu,et al.  Developing Existing Plant Root System Architecture Models to Meet Future Agricultural Challenges , 2005 .

[56]  Matthijs Tollenaar,et al.  Kernel Set in Maize Hybrids and Their Inbred Lines Exposed to Stress , 2006 .

[57]  J. Abe,et al.  Genotypic Variation in Root Growth Angle in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) and its Association with Deep Root Development in Upland Fields with Different Water Regimes , 2006, Plant and Soil.

[58]  Peter deVoil,et al.  The role of root architectural traits in adaptation of wheat to water-limited environments. , 2006, Functional plant biology : FPB.

[59]  M. Cooper,et al.  Changes in drought tolerance in maize associated with fifty years of breeding for yield in the US Corn Belt [Zea mays L.] , 2006 .

[60]  M. Tollenaar DISSECTION OF PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESSES UNDERLYING GRAIN YIELD IN MAIZE BY EXAMINING GENETIC IMPROVEMENT AND HETEROSIS , 2006 .

[61]  María E. Otegui,et al.  Genetic gains in grain yield and related physiological attributes in Argentine maize hybrids , 2006 .

[62]  F. Tardieu,et al.  Are source and sink strengths genetically linked in maize plants subjected to water deficit? A QTL study of the responses of leaf growth and of Anthesis-Silking Interval to water deficit. , 2006, Journal of experimental botany.

[63]  M. Westgate,et al.  Coupling time to silking with plant growth rate in maize , 2007 .

[64]  Vm Dunbabin,et al.  Simulating the role of rooting traits in crop-weed competition , 2007 .

[65]  Donald N. Duvick,et al.  Long‐Term Selection in a Commercial Hybrid Maize Breeding Program , 2010 .