Standards-Based Evaluation and Teacher Career Satisfaction: A Structural Equation Modeling Analysis

Structural equation modeling was used to assess the plausibility of a conceptual model specifying hypothesized linkages among perceptions of characteristics of standards-based evaluation, work environment mediators, and career satisfaction and other outcomes. Four comprehensive high schools located in two neighboring counties in southern California provided the data for this study. The schools’ districts had recently developed and implemented evaluation systems based on six California Standards for the Teaching Profession generated in 1997. One hundred and seventy-eight teachers responded to survey questions designed to capture the following constructs: understandable/relevant standards, satisfactory/helpful evaluation, role ambiguity, effort performance-rating linkage, work criteria autonomy, career satisfaction, organizational commitment, and perceptions of the effectiveness of the evaluation system. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to assess whether the items measuring evaluation fit two hypothesized constructs. Structural equation modeling results indicated that there are two mediators in the evaluation-career satisfaction relationship: role ambiguity and work criteria autonomy.

[1]  Terry A. Beehr,et al.  Psychological Stress in the Workplace , 1995 .

[2]  J. L. Pierce,et al.  Effects of Introducing a Performance Management System on Employees' Subsequent Attitudes and Effort , 1999 .

[3]  Rex B. Kline,et al.  Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling , 1998 .

[4]  J. Breaugh.  The Measurement of Work Autonomy , 1985 .

[5]  James C. Anderson,et al.  STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING IN PRACTICE: A REVIEW AND RECOMMENDED TWO-STEP APPROACH , 1988 .

[6]  P. Bentler,et al.  Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis : Conventional criteria versus new alternatives , 1999 .

[7]  S. Lirtzman,et al.  Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations. , 1970 .

[8]  G. A. Marcoulides,et al.  Advanced structural equation modeling : issues and techniques , 1996 .

[9]  M. Fullan,et al.  Understanding Teacher Development. , 1992 .

[10]  H. Heneman,et al.  Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System: A Pilot Study* , 2001 .

[11]  Sharon F. Conley,et al.  What Matters to Whom: Predictors of Teacher Satisfaction in a Career Development Plan , 1998 .

[12]  Florence Stinglhamber,et al.  Organizations and supervisors as sources of support and targets of commitment: a longitudinal study , 2003 .

[13]  C. Parsons,et al.  Feedback and Feedback Inconsistency as Sources of Strain and Self-Evaluation , 1992 .

[14]  D. Hall.  A theoretical model of career subidentity development in organizational settings , 1971 .

[15]  Charlotte F. Danielson.  Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching , 1996 .

[16]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  Organizational Analysis of Stress , 1986 .

[17]  E. Lawler,et al.  Behavior in Organizations , 1986 .

[18]  M. Newcomb,et al.  Drug use and intimate relationships among women and men: separating specific from general effects in prospective data using structural equation models. , 1994, Journal of consulting and clinical psychology.

[19]  L. Ingvarson,et al.  Reforming Teachers' Pay Systems: The Advanced Skills Teacher in Australia , 1997 .

[20]  Lyman W. Porter,et al.  Employee-Organization Linakges: The Psychology of Commitment, Absenteeism and Turnover , 1985 .

[21]  Douglas T. Hall,et al.  Careers In and Out of Organizations , 2001 .

[22]  Stephen G. West,et al.  Structural equation models with non-normal variables: Problems and remedies , 1995 .

[23]  Richard,et al.  Motivation through the Design of Work: Test of a Theory. , 1976 .

[24]  J. Breaugh.  Further Investigation of the Work Autonomy Scales: Two Studies , 1999 .

[25]  S. Jackson,et al.  A meta-analysis and conceptual critique of research on role ambiguity and role conflict in work settings , 1985 .

[26]  R. Hoyle.  Structural equation modeling: concepts, issues, and applications , 1997 .

[27]  H. Heneman,et al.  Continuing Assessment of Teacher Reactions to a Standards-Based Teacher Evaluation System , 2003 .

[28]  S. West,et al.  The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. , 1996 .

[29]  K. Acheson,et al.  Techniques in the Clinical Supervision of Teachers: Preservice and In-Service Applications , 1992 .

[30]  R. P. McDonald,et al.  Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. , 2002, Psychological methods.

[31]  Samuel B. Bacharach,et al.  The School Work Environment and Teacher Career Dissatisfaction , 1989 .

[32]  James L. Arbuckle,et al.  Full Information Estimation in the Presence of Incomplete Data , 1996 .

[33]  Steven M. Kimball.  Analysis of Feedback, Enabling Conditions and Fairness Perceptions of Teachers in Three School Districts with New Standards-Based Evaluation Systems , 2002 .

[34]  S. Jackson,et al.  Toward an understanding of the burnout phenomenon. , 1986, The Journal of applied psychology.

[35]  N. Glasman,et al.  Possible Determinants of Teacher Receptivity to Evaluation. , 1982 .

[36]  J. Breaugh,et al.  Further Examination of the Work Autonomy Scales: Three Studies , 1987 .

[37]  Joseph Murphy,et al.  Handbook of Research on Educational Administration , 1999 .

[38]  R. Kahn,et al.  The Social Psychology of Organizations , 1966 .

[39]  Sharon Conley,et al.  Teacher role stress, higher order needs and work outcomes , 2000 .