The Impact of Role Assignment on Cognitive Presence in Asynchronous Online Discussion

This study examined the impact of role assignment on cognitive presence when students participated in asynchronous online threaded discussions. A mixed methods design was used to investigate changes in the levels of cognitive presence while the students participated in an online introductory nutrition course. This study found evidence that scripted role assignment can be an effective instructional strategy when the approach is implemented into asynchronous online discussions. Implications for instructors and designers of asynchronous online learning environments are discussed.

[1]  Patsy L. Duphorne,et al.  The Effect of Three Computer Conferencing Designs on Critical Thinking Skills of Nursing Students , 2005 .

[2]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Content analysis schemes to analyze transcripts of online asynchronous discussion groups: A review , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[3]  Tammy Schellens,et al.  Roles as a structuring tool in online discussion groups: The differential impact of different roles on social knowledge construction , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[4]  D. Newman,et al.  A Content Analysis Method to Measure Critical Thinking in Face-to-Face and Computer Supported Group Learning , 1995 .

[5]  Chien Yu,et al.  Impacts of role assignment and participation in asynchronous discussions in college-level online classes , 2014, Internet High. Educ..

[6]  Jennifer Richardson,et al.  Investigating students' level of critical thinking across instructional strategies in online discussions , 2010, Internet High. Educ..

[7]  Heather Kanuka,et al.  The influence of instructional methods on the quality of online discussion , 2006, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[8]  Dragan Gasevic,et al.  Externally-facilitated regulation scaffolding and role assignment to develop cognitive presence in asynchronous online discussions , 2015, Internet High. Educ..

[9]  Aubteen Darabi,et al.  Cognitive presence in asynchronous online learning: a comparison of four discussion strategies , 2011, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..

[10]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Emerging and scripted roles in computer-supported collaborative learning , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[11]  David W. Johnson,et al.  Ability and Task Difficulty in Cognitive Psychology , 1981 .

[12]  D. Randy Garrison,et al.  Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment: Computer Conferencing in Higher Education , 1999, Internet High. Educ..

[13]  Zehra Akyol,et al.  Understanding cognitive presence in an online and blended community of inquiry: Assessing outcomes and processes for deep approaches to learning , 2011, Br. J. Educ. Technol..

[14]  Sarah Schrire,et al.  Knowledge building in asynchronous discussion groups: Going beyond quantitative analysis , 2006, Comput. Educ..

[15]  D. Garrison,et al.  Critical thinking, cognitive presence, and computer conferencing in distance education , 2001 .

[16]  Jennifer C. Richardson,et al.  A Constructivist Approach to Online Learning: The Community of Inquiry Framework , 2009 .

[17]  Alyssa Friend Wise,et al.  Towards more precise design guidance: specifying and testing the functions of assigned student roles in online discussions , 2012 .

[18]  D. Garrison,et al.  The Development of a Community of Inquiry over Time in an Online Course: Understanding the Progression and Integration of Social, Cognitive and Teaching Presence. , 2008 .

[19]  M. Valcke,et al.  The Impact of Role Assignment on Knowledge Construction in Asynchronous Discussion Groups , 2005 .

[20]  Jan-Willem Strijbos,et al.  Developing the role concept for computer-supported collaborative learning: An explorative synthesis , 2010, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[21]  Kyu Yon Lim,et al.  Online university students' satisfaction and persistence: Examining perceived level of presence, usefulness and ease of use as predictors in a structural model , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[22]  Lisa Lobry de Bruyn,et al.  Monitoring online communication: can the development of convergence and social presence indicate an interactive learning environment? , 2004 .

[23]  Senom T. Yalcin,et al.  Online Learning: Patterns of Engagement and Interaction among In-Service teachers , 2003 .

[24]  Robert M. Bernard,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Three Types of Interaction Treatments in Distance Education , 2009 .

[25]  D. Garrison,et al.  Facilitating Cognitive Presence in Online Learning: Interaction Is Not Enough , 2005 .

[26]  Maureen Tam,et al.  Constructivism, Instructional Design, and Technology: Implications for Transforming Distance Learning , 2000, J. Educ. Technol. Soc..

[27]  Vic Lally,et al.  It's not so easy: researching the complexity of emergent participant roles and awareness in asynchronous networked learning discussions , 2004, J. Comput. Assist. Learn..