Cross-Cultural Differences and Learning Technologies for the Developing World

The LT4D workshop aims to provide a forum for a discussion of cross-cultural differences regarding the immersion of AIED systems and the rational introduction of learning technologies in the developing world. Focus of the workshop is to explicitly explore the economic, social, political and cultural constraints that shape affordances for learning technologies in the developing world.

[1]  Omar AlZoubi,et al.  Affect Detection from Multichannel Physiology during Learning Sessions with AutoTutor , 2011, AIED.

[2]  Vincent Aleven,et al.  Intelligent Tutoring Goes To School in the Big City , 1997 .

[3]  Yvonne Belanger,et al.  Bioelectricity: A Quantitative Approach Duke University’s First MOOC , 2013 .

[4]  Leigh L. Linden.  Complement or substitute? The effect of technology on student achievement in India , 2008 .

[5]  K. VanLehn.  The Relative Effectiveness of Human Tutoring, Intelligent Tutoring Systems, and Other Tutoring Systems , 2011 .

[6]  H. Abadzi.  Absenteeism and Beyond: Instructional Time Loss and Consequences , 2007 .

[7]  Roberto Araya,et al.  How come educational inequality in Cuba is much higher than in Chile , 2012 .

[8]  A. B. M.,et al.  Children's Drawings , 1896, Nature.

[9]  Min-hsiu Tsai,et al.  The Consistency Between Human Raters and an Automated Essay Scoring System in Grading High School Students' English Writing , 2012 .

[10]  Rob Frieden.  Next Generation Television and the Migration from Channels to Platforms , 2012 .

[11]  Lisa M. Rossi,et al.  Design Recommendations for Adaptive Intelligent Tutoring Systems Learner Modeling ( Volume I ) 155 CHAPTER 14 ‒ Assessing the Disengaged Behaviors of Learners , 2013 .

[12]  NikolićMladen,et al.  Software verification and graph similarity for automated evaluation of students' assignments , 2013 .

[13]  Sue Betka,et al.  National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance , 2015 .

[14]  Robbie Case,et al.  The Role of Central Conceptual Structures in the Development of Children's Thought , 1995 .

[15]  Wenzhe Li,et al.  Mechanix: A Sketch-Based Tutoring and Grading System for Free-Body Diagrams , 2012, AI Mag..

[16]  Imran A. Zualkernan,et al.  Using a Traveling Van to Deliver Blended Learning in a Developing Country , 2013, 2013 IEEE 13th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[17]  systematic review of literature examining the impact of homework on academic achievement , .

[18]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  Gender Differences in the Use and Benefit of Advanced Learning Technologies for Mathematics. , 2013 .

[19]  Norman H. Freeman,et al.  Strategies of representation in young children : analysis of spatial skills and drawing processes , 1980 .

[20]  Rémi Ronfard,et al.  A survey of vision-based methods for action representation, segmentation and recognition , 2011, Comput. Vis. Image Underst..

[21]  Carlos Alario-Hoyos,et al.  Comparison of the main alternatives to the integration of external tools in different platforms. , 2010 .

[22]  Stephen R. Ruth,et al.  Can MOOC’s and Existing E-Learning Efficiency Paradigms Help Reduce College Costs? , 2012 .

[23]  E. Hanushek,et al.  School Resources and Educational Outcomes in Developing Countries: A Review of the Literature from 1990 to 2010 , 2011 .

[24]  Katherine A. Rawson,et al.  Why Testing Improves Memory: Mediator Effectiveness Hypothesis , 2010, Science.

[25]  Robby Robson,et al.  Applying Semantic Analysis to Training, Education, and Immersive Learning , 2012 .

[26]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Web-Based Intelligent Multimedia Tutoring for High Stakes Achievement Tests , 2004, Intelligent Tutoring Systems.

[27]  Avron Barr,et al.  Catalyzing Connected Learning through Standards , 2011, 2011 IEEE Global Humanitarian Technology Conference.

[28]  I. Zualkernan,et al.  ONLINE CONTENT LOCALIZATION FOR BLENDED LEARNING IN DEVELOPING COUNTRIES: A CASE STUDY USING KHAN’S ACADEMY , 2013 .

[29]  H. Pashler,et al.  Increasing Retention Without Increasing Study Time , 2007 .

[30]  Esther Duflo,et al.  Peer Effects, Teacher Incentives, and the Impact of Tracking: Evidence from a Randomized Evaluation in Kenya , 2008 .

[31]  Larry Ambrose,et al.  The power of feedback. , 2002, Healthcare executive.

[32]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Effort-based Tutoring: An Empirical Approach to Intelligent Tutoring , 2010, EDM.

[33]  Pat Engle,et al.  Advances in Projective Drawing Interpretation , 1999 .

[34]  Arthur C. Graesser,et al.  AutoTutor: an intelligent tutoring system with mixed-initiative dialogue , 2005, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[35]  Url PubMed.  Retrieval Practice Produces More Learning than Elaborative Studying with Concept Mapping , 2012 .

[36]  Salman Khan,et al.  The One World Schoolhouse: Education Reimagined , 2012 .

[37]  B. Bloom.  The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring , 1984 .

[38]  Y. Kafai.  Gender Differences in Children's Constructions of Video Games , 1996 .

[39]  Kenton W. Murray,et al.  Automatic Essay Scoring , 2012 .

[40]  Mark Lawler,et al.  Investing in ICTs in educational institutions in developing countries: An evaluation of their impact in Kenya , 2007 .

[41]  Kurt VanLehn,et al.  The Andes Physics Tutoring System: Five Years of Evaluations , 2005, AIED.

[42]  David Wiley,et al.  A preliminary examination of the cost savings and learning impacts of using open textbooks in middle and high school science classes , 2012 .

[43]  Robert K. Atkinson,et al.  Searching for the two sigma advantage: Evaluating algebra intelligent tutors , 2013, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[44]  Kasia Muldner,et al.  The Impact of Animated Pedagogical Agents on Girls' and Boys' Emotions, Attitudes, Behaviors and Learning , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.

[45]  Daksha Patel,et al.  Open educational resources , 2015, Community eye health.

[46]  Benjamin D. Jee,et al.  Sketch Worksheets: A Sketch-Based Educational Software System , 2010, IAAI.

[47]  Paula J Durlach,et al.  Designing Adaptive Instructional Environments: Insights from Empirical Evidence , 2011 .

[48]  Salvatore Valenti,et al.  An Overview of Current Research on Automated Essay Grading , 2003, J. Inf. Technol. Educ..

[49]  Beverly Park Woolf,et al.  Building Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-learning , 2008 .

[50]  Neil T. Heffernan,et al.  Estimating the Effect of Web-Based Homework , 2013, AIED Workshops.

[51]  Hal Abelson,et al.  The Creation of OpenCourseWare at MIT , 2008 .

[52]  Philip N Chase,et al.  The effects of cumulative practice on mathematics problem solving. , 2002, Journal of applied behavior analysis.

[53]  John H. Mott,et al.  Envisioning the Post-LMS Era: The Open Learning Network , 2010 .

[54]  Hilary Johnson,et al.  Developing an Embodied Pedagogical Agent with and for Young People with Autism Spectrum Disorder , 2012, ITS.

[55]  K. Blair.  Pedagogical agents for learning by teaching: Teachable agents , 2007 .

[56]  Rafael A. Calvo,et al.  Affect Detection: An Interdisciplinary Review of Models, Methods, and Their Applications , 2010, IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing.

[57]  Juan Leon,et al.  What works to improve teacher attendance in developing countries? A systematic review , 2012 .

[58]  Imran A. Zualkernan.  InfoCoral: Open-Source Hardware for Low-Cost, High-Density Concurrent Simple Response Ubiquitous Systems , 2011, 2011 IEEE 11th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies.